The Effect of the Andalus Knowledge Phases and Times Model of Learning on the Development of Students’ Academic Performance and Emotional Quotient
Authors: Sobhy Fathy A. Hashesh
This study aimed at investigating the effect of Andalus Knowledge Phases and Times (ANPT) model of learning and the effect of 'Intel Education Contribution in ANPT' on the development of students’ academic performance and emotional quotient. The society of the study composed of Andalus Private Schools, elementary school students (N=700), while the sample of the study composed of four randomly assigned groups (N=80) with one experimental group and one control group to study "ANPT" effect and the "Intel Contribution in ANPT" effect respectively. The study followed the quantitative and qualitative approaches in collecting and analyzing data to answer the study questions. Results of the study revealed that there were significant statistical differences between students’ academic performances and emotional quotients for the favor of the experimental groups. The study recommended applying this model on different educational variables and on other age groups to generate more data leading to more educational results for the favor of students’ learning outcomes.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1124905Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 890
 Hashesh, S., (2015), The Effect of Andalus Knowledge Phases and Times on The Development of Students Academic Performance, 4th edition, Andalusiat.
 Cobuild, C., (2003), Collins Cobuild English Dictionary for Advanced Learners, 4th edition, Harper Collins Publishers, Retrieved May 11, 2016 from http://dictionary.reverso.net/english-synonyms/germinate/forced
 Bybee, R., Taylor, J., Gardner, A., Scotter, P., Powell, J., Westbrook, A., and Landes, N., (July, 2006), The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins, Effectiveness, and Applications, BSCS 5415 Mark Dabling Boulevar Colorado Spring, CO 80918 Retrieved May 8,2016 from http://www.bscs.org/sites/default/files/_legacy/BSCS_5E_Instructional_Model-Executive_Summary_0.pdf
 Kennedy, K. Test Scores Show Kagan Structures Work at Long Hill Elementary School. San Clemente, CA: Kagan Publishing. Kagan Online Magazine, Summer 2000. www.KaganOnline.com
 Amresh, A., Carberry, A., and John Femiani, J., Evaluating the Effectiveness of Flipped Classrooms for Teaching CS1, College of Technology & Innovation Arizona State University Mesa, AZ, USA. Retrieved May 8, 2016 from https://interactive.asu.edu/wp-content/papercite-data/pdf/amresh2013evaluating.pdf
 Intel® Education, (January 2015), Intel® Education Transforming Learning Introduction to Tablets in the Classroom, Retrieved May, 2016 from http://www.schoolnet.org.za/intel/transforming_learning/tablets/Course_Manual.pdf
 Redding, R. (1989). Underachievement in the verbally gifted: Implications for pedagogy. Psychology in the Schools, 26(3), 275-291.
 Dash & Thomson, (July 13, 2011 at 6:00 am), “Social Learning Blog: Four Phases of Learning, Preparation: Arousing Interest) http://www.dashe.com/blog/instructional-design/four-phases-of-learning/
 Hussain, A. (October 22, 2009 // 07:17 AM). “Ideas to Transform Your Training: Effective Corporate Training through Learning Cycle). Retrieved from http://blog.commlabindia.com/elearning-design/effective-corporate-training
 Atkinson, R., & Shiffrin, R. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K Spence & J Spence (Eds.). The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.
 Anthony W. Lorsbach, The Learning Cycle as a Tool for Planning Science Instruction, Illinois State University (last accessed June 15, 2006) Retrieved April 24, 2016 from http://edutechwiki.unige.ch/en/5e_Learning_cycle
 McInerney, D. (2013). Educational Psychology: Constructing Learning. Pearson Higher Education AU.
 Jones, P.H. 1989. Knowledge Acquisition. In: Barrett, J.R. and D.D. Jones. Knowledge Engineering in Agriculture. ASAE Monograph No. 8, ASAE, St. Joseph, MI.
 DeJong, G. (1995). A case study of explanation-based control. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Workshop on Machine Learning, pages 167,175(1995)
 Walsh, K., (November 3, 2013), Flipping the Classroom Facilitates Active Learning Methods – Experiential, Project Based, Problem Based, Inquiry Based, Constructivism, Etc. Retrieved April 24, 2016 from http://www.emergingedtech.com/2013/11/flipping-the-classroom-facilitates-these-5-active-learning-methods-and-much-more/
 Eddy, S. (2010, November 3). Theories of Cognitive Development: Lev Vygotsky. Retrieved January 15, 2015, from https://psychohawks.wordpress.com/2010/11/03/theories-of-cognitive-development-lev-vygotsky/