Developing New Media Credibility Scale: A Multidimensional Perspective

Authors: Hanaa Farouk Saleh

Abstract:

The main purposes of this study are to develop a scale that reflects emerging theoretical understandings of new media credibility, based on the evolution of credibility studies in western researches, identification of the determinants of credibility in the media and its components by comparing traditional and new media credibility scales and building accumulative scale to test new media credibility. This approach was built on western researches using conceptualizations of media credibility, which focuses on four principal components: Source (journalist), message (article), medium (newspaper, radio, TV, web, etc.), and organization (owner of the medium), and adding user and cultural context as key components to assess new media credibility in particular. This study’s value lies in its contribution to the conceptualization and development of new media credibility through the creation of a theoretical measurement tool. Future studies should explore this scale to test new media credibility, which represents a promising new approach in the efforts to define and measure credibility of all media types.

Keywords: Credibility scale, media credibility components, new media credibility scale, scale development.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1124519

References:

[1] Megan Clarke, From the anchor’s desk: How an anchor’s race affects viewer perceptions of credibility, master of arts, university of Missouri- Columbia, 2005, p58.
[2] Li Zeng, Whose bias is no bias?, The impact of source types on perception of online news credibility, PhD, southern Illinois university school of journalism, March 2005, 24.
[3] Bonnie Joy McCracken, Are new media credible? A multidimensional approach to measuring news consumers’ credibility and bias perceptions and the frequency of news consumption, master of science in communication & media technologies, Liberal arts: communication department, 2011, p7.
[4] William Scott Sanders, Identity, trust, and credibility online: Evaluating contradictory user-generated information via the warranting principle, PhD, University of Southern California, august 2012, p2.
[5] Sambhavi Chandrashekar, Is hearing believing? Perception of online information credibility by screen reader users who are blind or visually impaired, PhD, university of Toronto: faculty of information, 2010, p568.
[6] Teven, J. J., & McCroskey, J. C. (1997). The relationship of perceived teacher caring with student learning and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 46, 1-9.
[7] Chasu An, Efficacy of inoculation strategies in promoting resistance to political attack messages: source credibility perspective, Ph.D, university of Oklahoma, 2003, p29.
[8] Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., Eyal, K., Lemus, D. R., & McCann, R. M. (2003). Credibility for the 21st Century: Integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. In P. J. Kalbfleisc (Ed.), Communication Yearbook (Vol. 27, pp. 293-335). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[9] Tracy A. Rickman, Credibility in the blogosphere: A study of measurement and influence of wine blogs as an information source, PhD, Auburn University, Alabama, 2010, p83.
[10] Yifeng Hu, Health information on the internet: Influence of online sources on credibility and behavioral intentions, PhD, Pennsylvania state university,, 2007, p83.
[11] Burbules, N. C. (2001). Paradoxes of the web: The ethical dimensions of credibility. Library Trends, 49(3), 441-453.
[12] Andrius Viktoras Kirkyla, The effect of task and personal relevance on credibility judgments while searching on the internet, Ph.D, graduate school-new Brunswick Rutgers, the state university of New Jersey,2010, p22.
[13] Ivanka Pjesivac,Rachel Rui, Anonymous sources hurt credibility of news stories across cultures: A comparative experiment in America and china, the international communication gazette, vol. 76(8),2014,pp 641– 660,p655.
[14] Larissa A. Bolalek, News source preferences and news source credibility among college staff, faculty, and students, master, the Rochester institute of technology department of communication college of liberal arts,2013, p11.
[15] Andrea miller and David Kurpius, A citizen-eye view of television news source credibility, American behavioral scientist,54(2), p137–156, 2010, p149.
[16] Seungahn Nah,Deborah S Chung, When citizens meet both professional and citizen journalists: Social trust, media credibility, and perceived journalistic roles among online community news readers, journalism,13(6) 714–730,2011
[17] Elmie Nekmat, Karla K. Gower, Shuhua Zhou, and Miriam Metzger, Connective-collective action on social media: Moderated mediation of cognitive elaboration and perceived source credibility on personalness of source, communication research,1–26,2015, p7.
[18] Xiao Hu, Assessing source credibility on social media: An electronic word-of-mouth communication perspective, PhD, college of Bowling Green, 2015, p79.
[19] Michael J. Scott, the interaction of age, sex, and occupation as they relate to perceived source credibility and attitude difference, master, university of Wyoming Laramie, December 1975.
[20] Goldberg, Alvan, Crisp, Lloyd, Sieburg, Evelyn, and Tolela, Michele. "Subordinate Ethos and Leadership Attitudes." Quarterly Journal of Speech, Vol. 52, No. 4 (December 1967), 354-360.
[21] Richard Nelson wood, the effects of sex and age on the perceived credibility of a simulated local television newscast, PhD, the university of Arizona, 1978, pp17.
[22] Farr, A. C., & Witte, K. (2003). Defining expertise to create a more effective conceptualization of source credibility. Manuscript under review. In Angela Celeste Farr, The effect of race and expertise on source credibility ratings, PhD, Michigan state university: department of communication arts and sciences,2003
[23] Newell, Stephen john, developing a measurement scale and a theoretical model defining corporate credibility and determining its role as an antecedent of consumers’ attitude toward the advertisement, PhD, the Florida state university college of business, 1993.
[24] Angela Celeste Farr, The effect of race and expertise on source credibility ratings, PhD, Michigan state university: department of communication arts and sciences,2003, p7.
[25] Kelman, H. C., & Hovland, C- I. (1953). Reinstatement of the communicator in delayed measurement of opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 327-335.
[26] Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility. In M. J. Metzger and A. J. Flanagin(Ed.), The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur foundation series on digital media and learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008. 73–100
[27] Eastin, M. S. (2001). Credibility assessments of online health information: The effects of source expertise and knowledge of content. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(4). from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue4/eastin.html
[28] Sigal, L. V. (1986). Who? Sources make the news. In R. K. Manoff & M. Schudson (Eds.), Reading the news (pp. 9-37). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
[29] Dwight John Brady, Enhancing the credibility of media institutions: An experimental analysis involving local television news organizations and the world wide web, Ph.D, the university of Tennessee, knoxville,1997, p63.
[30] Yifeng Hu and S. Shyam Sundar, Effects of Online Health Sources on Credibility and Behavioral Intentions, communication research,37(1), p105-132,2010, p121.
[31] Westerman, D., Spence, P. R., & Van Der Heide, B. (2014). Social media as information source: Recency of updates and credibility of information. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 2, 171- 183.
[32] Steinbruck, U., Schaumburg, H., Duda, S., & Kruger, T. (2002, April 20-25). A picture says more than a thousand words - photographs as trust builders in e-commerce websites. Proceedings of CHI 2002: Extended Abstracts, 748-749.
[33] Riegelsberger, J., Sasse, A., & McCarthy, J. (2003). Shiny happy people building trust? Photos on e-commerce websites and consumer trust. Proceedings of CHI 2003, 121-128.
[34] Vincent A. Decker, Examining consumer perceptions of online university websites' credibility, PhD, north central university graduate faculty of the school of business and technology management,2011, p166.
[35] Kirsten A. Johnson, The impact of hyperlinks and writer information on the perceived credibility of stories on a participatory journalism website, PhD, Drexel University, 2007, p29.
[36] Camilla Espina, Perceived cultural proximity and perceived news source credibility in Puerto Rico, master, university of Puerto Rico, río piedras campus,2013, p2.
[37] Phinney, J. S. (1992). The multigroup ethnic identity measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7, 156-176.
[38] Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 413-439.
[39] Sundar,S.S., & Nass, C. (2001). Conceptualizing sources in online news, Journal of Communication, 51(1), 52-72.
[40] Sundar, S. S. (2007). The MAIN Model: A Heuristic Approach to Understanding Technology Effects on Credibility. In M.J. Metzger & A.J. Flanagin (Eds.) Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility (pp. 73-100). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[41] Kevin A. Wombacher, An exploration of the relationship between source credibility and perceived support in online social support groups, master, Saint Louis university,2013, pp17.
[42] Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
[43] Teun Lucassen,Jan Maarten Schraagen, Propensity to trust and the influence of source and medium cues in credibility evaluation, journal of information science,38(6), sage publications, 566–577, 2012,p5575.
[44] Aaron Micah Wester, Readers’ trust, socio-demographic, and acuity influences in citizen journalism credibility for disrupted online newspapers, Ph.D, university of Phoenix, 2013, p457.
[45] Joon Soo Lim, Persuasive message typicality and source credibility: A schema-copy-plus-tag model with sleeper effects, PhD, university of Florida, 2006, p160.
[46] Alyssa Appelman and S. Shyam Sundar, Measuring message credibility: Construction and validation of an exclusive scale, journalism & mass communication quarterly,1–21, 2015, p2.
[47] Yijia Wang, Fashion meets twitter: Does the source matter? Perceived message credibility, interactivity and purchase intention, master, Reed College of media at West Virginia University, 2014, p13.
[48] D. Jasun Carr, Matthew barnidge, Byung Gu Lee, and Stephanie Tean Tsang, Cynics and skeptics: Evaluating the credibility of mainstream and citizen journalism, journalism & mass communication quarterly, vol. 91(3) 452–470, 2014, p454-455.
[49] Kelly K. Daily, Explicating the hostile media perception: How source credibility influences partisans’ responses to balanced news coverage of health policies, PhD, university of Maryland, college park,2014, p21.
[50] Gunther, A. C. (1992). Biased press or biased public? Attitudes toward media coverage of social groups. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 147-167.
[51] Eisa al Nashmi, Aljazeera on YouTube: A credible source in the United States? PhD, university of Florida, 2011, p128.
[52] Chris Roberts, Correlations among variables in message and messenger credibility scales, American behavioral scientist, 54(1) 43–56, 2010, p45.
[53] Lawrence, Allyn Elaine, Effects of status and gender of author and sex of reader on evaluation of author credibility, Ph.D., the University of Arizona, 1980, p27.
[54] Hans K. Meyer, Doreen Marchionni and Esther Thorson, The journalist behind the news: credibility of straight, collaborative, opinionated, and blogged “news”, American behavioral scientist 54(2),100–119,2010, p111.
[55] Luchok, J. A., & McCroskey, J. C. (1978). The effect of quality of evidence on attitude change and source credibility. The Southern Speech Communication journal, 43, 371-383.
[56] Mark Christopher Roberts, Measuring the relationship between journalistic transparency and credibility, PhD, college of mass communications and information studies, university of South Carolina, 2007, p110.
[57] Zillman in Gi Woong Yuit, The effects of interactivity on the credibility of static web sites and web site forums, PhD, university of Wisconsin – madison,2003, p 50
[58] Gi Woong Yuit, The effects of interactivity on the credibility of static web sites and web site forums, PhD, university of Wisconsin – madison,2003p50.
[59] Virginia Vermillion Chapman, The effects of language style on the credibility of legal testimony, PhD, the department of speech communication Indiana University, 199, p493.
[60] Aaron Micah Wester, Readers’ trust, socio-demographic, and acuity influences in citizen journalism credibility for disrupted online newspapers, PhD, university of Phoenix, 2013, p43.
[61] Maier, S. (2002). Getting it right? Not in 59 percent of stories. Newspaper Research Journal, 23(1), 10-24.
[62] Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (1996). How message evaluation and source attributes may influence credibility assessment and belief change, journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(4), 974-991
[63] Carbone, Tamara. "Stylistic Variables as Related to Source Credibility: A Content Analysis Approach." Speech Monographs Vol. 42, No. 2 (June 1975), 99-107.
[64] Bradac, James J., Konsky, Catherine W. and Davies, Robert A. "Two Studies of the Effects of Linguistic Diversity upon Judgments of Communicator Attributes and Message Effectiveness." Speech Monographs, Vol. 43, No. 1 (March 1976), 70-80.
[65] Reinsch, N. L., Jr. "Figurative Language and Source Credibility: A Preliminary Investigation and Reconceptualization." Human Communication Research, Vol. 1, No. 1 (fall, 1974), 75-80.
[66] Taylor, Pat M. '! An Experimental Study of Humor and Ethos." Southern • Speech Communication Journal, Vol. 39, No. 4 (summer, 1974), 359- 366.
[67] Richard Nelson Wood, The effects of sex and age on the perceived credibility of a simulated local television newscast, PhD, the university of Arizona,1978, p21.p21
[68] King, P., & Tester, J. (1999). The landscape of persuasive technologies. Communications of the ACM, 42(5), 31-44.
[69] Andrew I. Flanagin and Miriam J. Metzger, Perceptions of internet information credibility, J&MCQuarterly, vol. 7,no.3, autum2000, p515- 540.p519
[70] Consuelo m. Ramirez, What is the impact of humor, message content and the leader's gender, the Lake University, august, 2002, p71.
[71] Drew M. Link, Effects of online reputation mechanisms on perceived credibility and health decision making, master, the graduate school of Clemson university, 2013.
[72] Rebecca Van De Vord, Predictors of credibility assessments in online information seeking of college students, PhD, Washington state university Murrow college of communication, 2009.
[73] Ashley Ellen Blickenstaff, I’m fairly credible, don’t you think? A study of the effects of gendered language on source credibility and persuasion, master, Colorado state university Fort Collins, 2011, p32.
[74] Jeffrey g. Cox, The influence of content cues on consumers’ perceptions of online review credibility, Master of Arts in the school of journalism Indiana University, May 2013, p4.
[75] Burbules, N. C. (2001). Paradoxes of the web: The ethical dimensions of credibility. Library Trends, 50(4), 441-453.
[76] Susan Shepherd Ferebee, An examination of the effect of involvement level of website users on the perceived credibility of websites, PhD, graduate school of computer and information sciences, Nova southeastern university,2006, p36.
[77] Nielsen, J. (1999, March). Trust or bust: Communicating trustworthiness in Web design, from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9903 07.html.
[78] Wioletta Lucja Polanski, The effect of visual appeal on the perception of the credibility of a website for a student-run consulting business, master, university of Alberta,2005, p10.
[79] Katrina Pariera, Information literacy on the web: How visual and textual cues contribute to website credibility assessments, master, Washington, 2009, p60.
[80] Fogg, B.J. (2002, May). Stanford guidelines for web credibility. Research summary from the Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab. Stanford University. From www.webcredibility.org/guidelines
[81] Esperanza Huerta, The credibility of online information, PhD, Claremont, California,2003, p14.
[82] Jonathan Maxwell Mertel, Credibility on cable news: An examination of the factors that establish credibility in newscasters, master, the Rochester institute of technology, department of communication college of liberal arts,2012, p10.
[83] Lindgaard, G., Fernandes, G., Dudek, C., & Brown, J. (2006). Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! Behavior & Information Technology, 25(2), 115-126.
[84] Kirsten A. Johnson, The impact of hyperlinks and writer information on the perceived credibility of stories on a participatory journalism website, PhD, Drexel university, 2007, p46.
[85] Vallone, R. P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 577-585.
[86] Jih-Hsuan Lin, College students' perceptions of credibility of blogs and traditional media as a function of their blog usage, master, Michigan state university: department of journalism, 2007, p98.
[87] Beaudoin, C. E., & Thorson, E. (2002). A marketplace theory of media use. Mass Communication & Society, 3(3), 241-262.
[88] Christopher H. Schulz, Media credibility perceptions and its effect on shield laws, master, the school of journalism and the faculty of the University of Kansas, 2003, p54.
[89] Fogg, B. J., & Tseng, H. (1999, May 15-20). The elements of computer credibility. Paper presented at the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI '99, Pittsburgh, PA.
[90] Inch, E. S., & Warnick, B. (2002). Critical thinking and communication: The use of reason in argument (4th Ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
[91] Joon Soo Lim, Persuasive message typicality and source credibility: A schema-copy-plus-tag model with sleeper effects, PhD, university of Florida, 2006, p74.
[92] Hollander, B. (2008). Tuning out or tuning elsewhere? Partisanship, polarization, and media migration from 1998 to 2006. Journalism and mass communication quarterly, 85(1), 23-40.
[93] Rimmer, T. and D. Weaver (1987) ‘Different Questions, Different Answers? Media Use and Media Credibility’, Journalism Quarterly 64: 28–36.
[94] Daekyung Kim and Thomas J. Johnson, A shift in media credibility: Comparing internet and traditional news sources in South Korea, the international communication gazette, sage publications, vol. 71(4): 283– 302, 2009, p290.
[95] Fang He, Chinese college students’ perceptions of media credibility and free speech in the internet age, master, California state university, Fullerton, 2003, p63.
[96] Young Ju Kim, Exploring the effects of source credibility and others’ comments on online news evaluation, master, university of California,2012, p8.
[97] Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2000). Perception of Internet information credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 515-540.
[98] Johnson, T. J. and Kaye, B. K. (1998) ‘Cruising is believing: Comparing Internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 75: 325-340.
[99] Daekyung Kim, Abandoning traditional news?: Examining factors influencing the displacement effects of online news on traditional news media, PhD, school of journalism in the graduate school Southern Illinois university Carbondale, December 2006,p214.
[100] Vincent A. Decker, Examining consumer perceptions of online university websites' credibility, PhD, Northcentral university graduate faculty of the school of business and technology management,2011, p132.
[101] Eastin, M. (2001). Credibility assessments of online health information: The effects of source expertise and knowledge of content. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 6(4), 0-13.
[102] Freeman, K. S. & Spyridakis, J. H. (2004). An examination of factors that affect the credibility of online health information. Technical Communication, 51(2), 239- 263.
[103] Johnson, T.J. and B.K. Kaye (1998) ‘Using is believing? Comparing Internet and Traditional Sources on Media Credibility Measures’, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 75: 325–40.
[104] Jones, D. A. (2004). Why Americans don’t trust the media:-A preliminary analysis. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 9(2), 60-75.
[105] Gronke, P., & Cook, T. E. (2007). Disdaining the media: The American public’s changing attitudes toward the news. Political Communication, 24, 259–281
[106] Bennett, S. E., Rhine, S. L., & Flickinger, R. S. (2001). Assessing Americans’ opinions about the news media’s fairness in 1996 and 1998. Political Communication, 18, 163–182.
[107] Bennett, S. E., Rhine, S. L., Flickinger, R. S., & Bennett, L. M. (1999). ‘‘Video malaise’’ revisited: Public trust in media and government. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 4, 8–23.
[108] Yariv Tsfati and Gal Ariely, Individual and contextual correlates of trust in media across 44 countries, communication research, 2014, vol. 41(6) 760–782, 2013, p762.
[109] Fogg, B. J. (2003). Prominence-interpretation theory: Explaining how people assess credibility online. CHI ’03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (722-723). New York: ACM Press.
[110] Jesse R. Sparks, Critical evaluation of information credibility: Contextual dimensions and implications for memory and learning from text, PhD, Evanston, Illinois, 2013, p2.
[111] Chenyan Shan, The sources young people trust: The credibility ratings of sources of national political news in china, master, Iowa state university, 2013, p57.
[112] Zengjun Peng, Ideology, source, news content, and perception of media bias and credibility: An empirical study on hostile media effect, PhD, the faculty of the graduate school, university of Missouri-Columbia, 2005, p73.
[113] Yuwei Sun, The effect of self-censorship on news credibility: Public’s perception of Hong Kong newspapers after the 1997 handover, master, Iowa state university, 2014, p40.
[114] Stephen William King, An experimental analysis of the effects of message type, degree of interpersonal similarity, and type of interpersonal similarity on attitude change and ratings of source credibility, PhD, faculty of the graduate school, university of Southern California,1971, p63.
[115] Meyer,Marchionni, and Thorson (2010) in Ryan Bradley Medders, The role of need for cognition and credibility assessment in exposure to political information on the internet, PhD, university of California Santa barbara,2014,p40.
[116] Oyedeji T. A. (2010). The Credible Brand Model: The Effects of Ideological Congruency and Customer-Based Brand Equity on News Credibility, American Behavioral Scientist, 54 (2), 83-99.
[117] Ryan Bradley Medders, The role of need for cognition and credibility assessment in exposure to political information on the internet, PhD, university of California Santa Barbara, 2014, p40.
[118] Christopher Lathrop, The effects of context on receiver-perceived dimensions of credibility using subject-generated scales, master, department of communication and the graduate school of the university of wyoming,1984, p18.
[119] Lebo, H. (2004) ‘First Release of Findings from the UCLA World Internet Project Shows Significant “Digital Gender Gap” in Many Countries’; at:newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/First-Release-of-Findings- From-4849.aspx
[120] Thomas j. Johnson and Shahira Fahmy, The CNN of the Arab world or a shill for terrorists? How support for press freedom and political ideology predicts credibility of Al-Jazeera among its audience, the international communication gazette, vol. 70(5): 338–360, sage publications 2008, p341.
[121] Yariv Tsfati and Gal Ariely, Individual and contextual correlates of trust in media across 44 countries, communication research, 2014, vol. 41(6) 760–782, 2013, p776.
[122] Flanagin, A., & Metzger, M. (2000). Perceptions of Internet information credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 515– 540.
[123] Kang, C. Y. (2009). Communication technologies: Diffusion of online news use and credibility among young web users in the information age. (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Nevada-Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV.
[124] Hyojung Park and Glen T. Cameron, Keeping it real: Exploring the roles of conversational human voice and source credibility in crisis communication via blogs, journalism & mass communication quarterly, vol. 91(3) 487–507, 2014, p491.
[125] Hamish Mclean,Mary R.Power, When minutes count: Tension and trust in the relationship between emergency managers and the media, journalism , vol. 15(3) 307– 325,2014,p307.
[126] Haiman, Franklyn. "An Experimental Study of the Effects of Ethos in Public Speaking." Speech Monographs, Vol. 15, No. 2 (September 1949), 190-202.
[127] Whittaker, James 0. And Meade, Robert D. "Sex of the Communicator as a Variable in Source Credibility." Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 72 (fall, 1967), 27-34.
[128] Richmond, Virginia, P. and McCroskey, James C. "Whose Opinion do You Trust?" Journal of Communication, Vol. 25, No. 3 (summer, 1975), 43-50.
[129] Sony Kusumasondjaja, Tekle Shanka, Christopher Marchegiani, Credibility of online reviews and initial trust: The roles of reviewer’s identity and review valence, journal of vacation marketing 18(3) 185– 195, 2012, p191.