The Wider Benefits of Negotiations: Austrian Perspective on Educational Leadership as a ‘Power Game’ for Trade Unions
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32807
The Wider Benefits of Negotiations: Austrian Perspective on Educational Leadership as a ‘Power Game’ for Trade Unions

Authors: Rudolf Egger

Abstract:

This paper explores the relationships between the basic learning processes of leading trade union workers and their methods for coping with the changes in the life-courses of societies today. It will discuss the fragile discourse on lifelong learning in trade unions and the “production of self-techniques” to get in touch with the new economic forms. On the basis of an empirical project, different processes of the socialization of leading trade union workers will be analysed to discover the consequences of the lifelong learning discourse. The results show what competences they need to develop for the “wider benefits of negotiations”. The main challenge remains to make visible how deeply intertwined trade union learning and education are with development in an ongoing dynamic economic process, rather than a quick-fix injection of skills and information. There is a complex relationship existing between the three ‘partners’, work, learning and society forming. The author suggests that contemporary trade unions could be trendsetters who make their own learning agendas by drawing less on formal education and more on informal and non-formal learning contexts. This is in parallel with growing political and scientific consciousness of the need to arrive at new educational/vocational policies and practices.

Keywords: Lifelong learning, Trade unions, Non-formal learning, Educational/vocational policies.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1124429

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1192

References:


[1] Alheit, Peter, & Dausien, Bettina, 2002: Bildungsprozesse über die Lebensspanne und lebenslanges Lernen. In: Rudolf Tippelt (Ed.), Handbuch Bildungsforschung. Opladen, pp. 569-589.
[2] Bandura, Albert (1997). Self-Efficacy. The Exercise of Control. New York.
[3] Bauman, Zygmunt (2010): Wir Lebenskünstler. Frankfurt am Main.
[4] Castells, M. (1997) The Power of Identity (The Information Age), Blackwell Publishers.
[5] Crouch, Colin (2008): Postdemokratie. Frankfurt.
[6] Deiß, Manfred/Heidling, Eckhard (2001): Interessenvertretung und Expertenwissen. Düsseldorf.
[7] Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund (Hg.) (2005): Gut beraten für die Zukunft. Projektdokumentation / Zwischenbericht des Beratungs- und Qualifizierungsprojekts Leben und Arbeiten (LeA) des DGB. Berlin (http://www.dgb-lea.de/pdf-Dateien/Projektzwischenbericht.pdf) (31.01.2009).
[8] Field, John, 2000: Lifelong Learning and the New Educational Order. Stoke on Trent.
[9] Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age.
[10] Schmierl, Klaus (2000): Interessenvertretung ohne kollektive Akteure? Grenzen industrieller Beziehungen bei entgrenzter Produktion. In: Funder, Maria (Hg.): Entwicklungstrends der Unternehmensreorganisation - Internationalisierung, Dezentralisierung, Flexibilisierung. Linz, pp. 73-107.