Different Roles for Mentors and Mentees in an e-Learning Environment
Authors: Nidhi Gadura
Abstract:
Given the increase in the number of students and administrators asking for online courses the author developed two partially online courses. One was a biology majors at genetics course while the other was a non-majors at biology course. The student body at Queensborough Community College is generally underprepared and has work and family obligations. As an educator, one has to be mindful about changing the pedagogical approach, therefore, special care was taken when designing the course material. Despite the initial concerns, both of these partially online courses were received really well by students. Lessons learnt were that student engagement is the key to success in an online course. Good practices to run a successful online course for underprepared students are discussed in this paper. Also discussed are the lessons learnt for making the eLearning environment better for all the students in the class, overachievers and underachievers alike.
Keywords: Partially online course, pedagogy, student engagement, community college.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1124307
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1649References:
[1] http://chronicle.com/article/Doubts-About-MOOCs-Continue-to/144007/ Feb 17, 2016.
[2] http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/exactly-how-many-students-take-online-courses/49455 Feb 17, 2016.
[3] http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/Community-College-FAQs.html Feb 19, 2016.
[4] http://www.qcc.cuny.edu/oira/docs/QCC-Fact-Sheet.pdf Queensborough Community College Fact Book. Downloaded Feb 5, 2016.
[5] http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/online-education/understanding-project-based-learning-in-the-online-classroom/ John Orlando Ph.D. Feb 5, 2016.
[6] Smith, G. G., Sorensen, C., Gump, A., Heindel, A. J., Caris, M., & Martinez, C. D. (2011). Overcoming student resistance to group work: Online versus face-to-face. Internet & Higher Education, 14(2), 121-128.
[7] Jenkins, J. (2014). Curiosity Killed the Cat but Not the Student. J. Jenkin’s Teaching Thoughts blog.
[8] http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/online-education/do-online-students-cheat-more-on-tests/ Maryellen Weimer Ph.D. November 26, 2015.
[9] Beck, V. (2014). Testing a model to predict online cheating—Much ado about nothing. Active Learning in Higher Education 15 (1), 65–75.
[10] chronicle.com/article/How-Flipping-the-Classroom/130857/; Berrett, 2012.
[11] Pelz. 2004. “(My) Three principles of effective online pedagogy.” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol. 8 Issue 3 (Jun).
[12] Walvoord, Barbara E. and Virginia Johnson Anderson. Effective Grading: A Tool for Learning and Assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1998.