Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30124
Currency Exchange Rate Forecasts Using Quantile Regression

Authors: Yuzhi Cai

Abstract:

In this paper, we discuss a Bayesian approach to quantile autoregressive (QAR) time series model estimation and forecasting. Together with a combining forecasts technique, we then predict USD to GBP currency exchange rates. Combined forecasts contain all the information captured by the fitted QAR models at different quantile levels and are therefore better than those obtained from individual models. Our results show that an unequally weighted combining method performs better than other forecasting methodology. We found that a median AR model can perform well in point forecasting when the predictive density functions are symmetric. However, in practice, using the median AR model alone may involve the loss of information about the data captured by other QAR models. We recommend that combined forecasts should be used whenever possible.

Keywords: Exchange rate, quantile regression, combining forecasts.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1124287

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1378

References:


[1] Koenker, R. (2005). Quantiles Regression. Cambridge University Press.
[2] Cai, Y., Stander, J. and Davies, N. (2012). A new Bayesian approach to quantile autoregressive time series model estimation and forecasting. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 33, 684-698.
[3] Taylor, J. W. (2007). Forecasting daily supermarket sales using exponentially weighted quantile regression. European Journal of Operational Research, 178, 154-167.
[4] Banachewicz, K. and Lucas, A. (2008). Quantile forecasting for credit risk management using possibly misspecified hidden Markov models. Journal of Forecasting, 27, 566-586.
[5] Gerlacha, R. H., Chen, C. W. S. and Chan, N. Y. C. (2011). Bayesian time-varying quantile forecasting for value-at-risk in financial markets. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 29(4), 481-492.