Moving Beyond the Limits of Disability Inclusion: Using the Concept of Belonging Through Friendship to Improve the Outcome of the Social Model of Disability

Authors: Luke S. Carlos A. Thompson

Abstract:

The medical model of disability, though beneficial for the medical professional, is often exclusionary, restrictive and dehumanizing when applied to the lived experience of disability. As a result, a critique of this model was constructed called the social model of disability. Much of the language used to articulate the purpose behind the social model of disability can be summed up within the word inclusion. However, this essay asserts that inclusiveness is an incomplete aspiration. The social model, as it currently stands, does not aid in creating a society where those with impairments actually belong. Rather, the social model aids in lessening the visibility, or negative consequence of, difference. Therefore, the social model does not invite society to welcome those with physical and intellectual impairments. It simply aids society in ignoring the existence of impairment by removing explicit forms of exclusion. Rather than simple inclusion, then, this essay uses John Swinton’s concept of friendship and Jean Vanier’s understanding of belonging to better articulate the intended outcome of the social model—a society where everyone can belong.

Keywords: Belong, community, disability, exclusion, friendship, inclusion.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1124175

References:

[1] Barnartt, Sharon N., and Barbara Mandell Altman, eds. Exploring Theories and Expanding Methodologies: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go. 1st ed. Research in Social Science and Disability, v. 2. Amsterdam; New York: JAI, 2001, Ch. 1, 9-28.
[2] Cameron, Colin, ed. Disability Studies: A Student’s Guide. 1 edition. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2013, 98-99.
[3] Eiesland, Nancy L. The Disabled God: Toward a Liberatory Theology of Disability. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1994, 25.
[4] Hauerwas, Stanley. Suffering Presence: Theological Reflections on Medicine, the Mentally Handicapped and the Church. Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press, 1986, 166-167.
[5] Shakespeare, Tom. Disability Rights and Wrongs. New York: Routledge, 2006, 9-29.
[6] Swinton, John. Dementia: Living in the Memories of God. Grand Rapids, Mich: William B Eerdmans Publishing Co, 2012, 279.
[7] Swinton, John, and Richard Payne, eds. Living Well and Dying Faithfully: Christian Practices for End-of-Life Care. Grand Rapids, Mich: William B. Eerdmans Pub. Co, 2009, 234.
[8] Swinton, John. Resurrecting the Person: Friendship and the Care of People with Mental Health Problems. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 2000, 23.
[9] Swinton, John. Spirituality and Mental Health Care: Rediscovering a “Forgotten” Dimension. London; Philadelphia: J. Kingsley Publishers, 2001, 49-52.
[10] Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation, and the Disability Alliance. The Union of the Physically Impaired against Segregation and the Disability Alliance Discuss Fundamental Principles of Disability: Being a Summary of the Discussion Held on 22nd November, 1975 and Containing Commentaries from Each Organisation. London, November 22, 1976, 3-4. An unabridged copy of this discussion can be accessed at: http://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/files/library/UPIAS-fundamental-principles.pdf
[11] Vanier, Jean. Becoming Human. London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1999, 35-41.
[12] Vanier, Jean. The Broken Body. London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 1988.
[13] Vanier, Jean. Community and Growth. London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 2007.
[14] Vanier, Jean. From Brokenness to Community. The Wit Lectures. New York: Paulist Press, 1992.
[15] Yong, Amos. The Bible, Disability, and the Church: A New Vision of the People of God. Grand Rapids, Mich: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2011.
[16] Yong, Amos. Theology and Down Syndrome: Reimagining Disability in Late Modernity. Waco, Texas: Baylor University Press, 2007.