iSEA: A Mobile Based Learning Application for History and Culture Knowledge Enhancement for the ASEAN Region

Authors: Maria Visitacion N. Gumabay, Byron Joseph A. Hallar, Annjeannette Alain D. Galang

Abstract:

This study was intended to provide a more efficient and convenient way for mobile users to enhance their knowledge about ASEAN countries. The researchers evaluated the utility of the developed crossword puzzle application and assessed the general usability of its user interface for its intended purpose and audience of users. The descriptive qualitative research method for the research design and the Mobile-D methodology was employed for the development of the software application output. With a generally favorable reception from its users, the researchers concluded that the iSEA Mobile Based Learning Application can be considered ready for general deployment and use. It was also concluded that additional studies can also be done to make a more complete assessment of the knowledge gained by its users before and after using the application.

Keywords: Mobile learning, e-learning, crossword, ASEAN, iSEA.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1124025

References:

[1] Baggaley, J., & Belawati, T. (2007). (Eds.).” Distance Education Technology in Asia”. Lahore: Virtual University of Pakistan.
[2] National Higher Education Policies towards ASEAN Community 2015. Paper presented at the 5th Director General, Secretary General, Commission of Higher Education Meeting of SEAMEO RIHED in Nha Trang, Vietnam. Retrieved October 8, 2012 from http://www.slideshare.net/gatothp2010/7-national-higher-education-policies-towards-asean- community-by-2015-v2.
[3] Mah, Paul (2014). The evolving asean data center market. (online) Available at: http://www.datacenterdynamics.com / focus / archive /2014/07/ evolving-asean-data-center-market. (Last Accessed 5 November 2014).
[4] Mazlack L. J. (2008). Computer Construction of Crossword Puzzles Using Precedence Relationships.
[5] Meehan, G., and Gray P., (1997). “Constructing Crossword Grids: Use of Heuristics vs Constraints”. Dept. of Computer Science, University of Aberdeen, Kings College.
[6] Shazeer, N. M. et al., (1999). “Solving Crossword Puzzles as Probabilistic Constraint Satisfaction”. In Proc. 16th National Conference on AI.
[7] Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2004). “Using Mobile Phones in Education”. 2nd IEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education. Retrieved January 5, 2013 from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=1281326
[8] Qiu, J., & Thompson, E. (2007). Editorial: “Mobile communication and Asian modernities”. New Media and Society, 9(6), 895-901.
[9] Singh, R., Sumeeth, M., and Miller, J. (2011) “Evaluating the readability of privacy policies in mobile environments.” International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction (IJMHCI), 3(1), pp. 55-78, 2011.
[10] Bloom, B. S. (1974). “An introduction to mastery learning theory”. In J. H. Block (Ed.), “Schools, society and mastery learning” (pp. 3–14). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
[11] McMillan, D.W., & Chavis, D.M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6-23.
[12] Rovai, A.P. (2002). “Building a sense of community at a distance”. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3 (1), 1-16.
[13] Herrington, Anthony., et al. “Design and Principles of Mobile Learning”. Retrieved August 5, 2012 from http://ro.uow.edu.au/edupapers/88/
[14] International Standard ISO/IEC 9126-1, "Software engineering – product quality – Part 1: quality model", pp. 9-10, 2006.
[15] Fetaji, M., Z. Dika, and B. Fetaji, (2008). “Usability testing and evaluation of a mobile software solution: a case study” 30th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, 2008, pp. 501-06.
[16] Kronen, M., Terrenghi, L. and Valle, C. (2005) “Usability requirements for mobile service scenarios”. 11th International Conference on Human- Computer Interaction, 2005, pp. 1-10.
[17] Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2007). “Mobile usability in educational contexts: what have we learnt?” International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), pp. 1-16, 2007.
[18] Marta, R. (2011). "Mobile documentation: usability guidelines, and considerations for providing documentation on kindle, tablets, and smartphones," IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 2011, pp.1-13.
[19] Nielsen, J. (2011) “Mobile content is twice as difficult,” Alerbox, available: Retrieved June 29, 2012 from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/mobile-content- comprehension.html.
[20] Parsons, D. and Ryu, H. (2006). “A framework for assessing the quality of mobile learning,” 11th International Conference for Process Improvement Research and Education (INSPIRE), 2006, pp. 17-27.
[21] Kynkäänniemi Tanja and KomulainenKaisa. Agile Documentation in Mobile-D Projects. Retrieved September 29, 2012 from http://www.agile-itea.org/public/deliverables/ITEA-AGILE-D2.10_v1.0.pdf
[22] Fonollera, D. & de Leon, G. (2005). “IPO Model. Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Approach to Beginners”. McGraw-Hill Inc. New York, USA, 2005.
[23] Ali, A., Ouda. An and Capretz, L. (2012). “An experiment for measuring the quality aspect of mobile learning”, 2nd International Conference in Applied and Theoretical Information Systems, to appear, 2012.
[24] TeachThoughtStaff. (2012). “Design Principles of Mobile Learning”. Retrieved October 11, 2012 from http://www.teachthought.com/ technology/12-principles-of-mobile-learning/