In-Flight Radiometric Performances Analysis of an Airborne Optical Payload
Performances analysis of remote sensing sensor is required to pursue a range of scientific research and application objectives. Laboratory analysis of any remote sensing instrument is essential, but not sufficient to establish a valid inflight one. In this study, with the aid of the in situ measurements and corresponding image of three-gray scale permanent artificial target, the in-flight radiometric performances analyses (in-flight radiometric calibration, dynamic range and response linearity, signal-noise-ratio (SNR), radiometric resolution) of self-developed short-wave infrared (SWIR) camera are performed. To acquire the inflight calibration coefficients of the SWIR camera, the at-sensor radiances (Li) for the artificial targets are firstly simulated with in situ measurements (atmosphere parameter and spectral reflectance of the target) and viewing geometries using MODTRAN model. With these radiances and the corresponding digital numbers (DN) in the image, a straight line with a formulation of L = G × DN + B is fitted by a minimization regression method, and the fitted coefficients, G and B, are inflight calibration coefficients. And then the high point (LH) and the low point (LL) of dynamic range can be described as LH= (G × DNH + B) and LL= B, respectively, where DNH is equal to 2n − 1 (n is the quantization number of the payload). Meanwhile, the sensor’s response linearity (δ) is described as the correlation coefficient of the regressed line. The results show that the calibration coefficients (G and B) are 0.0083 W·sr−1m−2µm−1 and −3.5 W·sr−1m−2µm−1; the low point of dynamic range is −3.5 W·sr−1m−2µm−1 and the high point is 30.5 W·sr−1m−2µm−1; the response linearity is approximately 99%. Furthermore, a SNR normalization method is used to assess the sensor’s SNR, and the normalized SNR is about 59.6 when the mean value of radiance is equal to 11.0 W·sr−1m−2µm−1; subsequently, the radiometric resolution is calculated about 0.1845 W•sr-1m-2μm-1. Moreover, in order to validate the result, a comparison of the measured radiance with a radiative-transfer-code-predicted over four portable artificial targets with reflectance of 20%, 30%, 40%, 50% respectively, is performed. It is noted that relative error for the calibration is within 6.6%.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1123935Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1010
 C.R. Li, L.L Tang, L.L. Ma, Y.S. Zhou, C.X. Gao, N. Wang, X.H. Li, X.H. Wang, and X.H. Zhu, “A comprehensive calibration and validation site for information remote sensing, Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment,” Int. Symposium on Remote Sens. Environ.,11–15 May 2015, Berlin, Germany, Volume XL-7/W3, pp.1233-1240.
 M. Dinguirard, and P.N. Slater, “Calibration of space-multispectral imaging sensors: A review.” Remote Sens. Environ. 1999, vol.68, pp.194–205.
 D. Susana, R. Pablo, H. David, and F. Beatriz, “Vicarious Radiometric Calibration of a Multispectral Camera on Board an Unmanned Aerial System,” Remote Sens., 2014, vol. 6, pp.1918-1937; doi:10.3390/rs6031918.
 C. X. Gao, L.L. Ma, Y. K. Liu, N. Wang, Y.G. Qian, L.L. Tang, C.R. Li, “The assessment of in-flight dynamic range and response linearity of optical payloads onboard GF-1 satellite,” Proc. of SPIE, 2014, Vol. 9264, doi:10.1117/12.2068794.
 X.H. Wang, L.L. Tang, C.R. Li, B. Yuan, B. Zhu, “A practical SNR estimation scheme for remotely sensed optical imagery,” Proc. of SPIE, 2009, Vol. 7384, pp. 738434-1–738434-6.