A Paradigm Shift towards Personalized and Scalable Product Development and Lifecycle Management Systems in the Aerospace Industry
Integrated systems for product design, manufacturing, and lifecycle management are difficult to implement and customize. Commercial software vendors, including CAD/CAM and third party PDM/PLM developers, create user interfaces and functionality that allow their products to be applied across many industries. The result is that systems become overloaded with functionality, difficult to navigate, and use terminology that is unfamiliar to engineers and production personnel. For example, manufacturers of automotive, aeronautical, electronics, and household products use similar but distinct methods and processes. Furthermore, each company tends to have their own preferred tools and programs for controlling work and information flow and that connect design, planning, and manufacturing processes to business applications. This paper presents a methodology and a case study that addresses these issues and suggests that in the future more companies will develop personalized applications that fit to the natural way that their business operates. A functioning system has been implemented at a highly competitive U.S. aerospace tooling and component supplier that works with many prominent airline manufacturers around the world including The Boeing Company, Airbus, Embraer, and Bombardier Aerospace. During the last three years, the program has produced significant benefits such as the automatic creation and management of component and assembly designs (parametric models and drawings), the extensive use of lightweight 3D data, and changes to the way projects are executed from beginning to end. CATIA (CAD/CAE/CAM) and a variety of programs developed in C#, VB.Net, HTML, and SQL make up the current system. The web-based platform is facilitating collaborative work across multiple sites around the world and improving communications with customers and suppliers. This work demonstrates that the creative use of Application Programming Interface (API) utilities, libraries, and methods is a key to automating many time-consuming tasks and linking applications together.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1123905Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1269
 Cubberly, William H., & Bakerjian, Ramon (Eds.), Tool and Manufacturing Engineers Handbook. Michigan: Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 1989. pp. 1-10.
 Prasad, B. (1996), “Converting Computer-Integrated Manufacturing into an Intelligent Information System by Combining CIM with Concurrent Engineering and Knowledge Management”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol. 100, no. 7, pp. 301–316, 2000.
 X.G. Ming, J.Q. Yan, X.H. Wang, S.N. Li, W.F. Lu, Q.J. Peng, Y.S. Mad, “Collaborative Process Planning and Manufacturing In Product Lifecycle Management”, Computers in Industry 59 (2008), p.154.
 L. Anthony, W.C. Regli, J.E. John, S.V. Lombeyda, An approach to capturing structure behavior, and function of artifacts in computer-aided design, Trans. ASME, J. Comput. Inform. Sci. Eng. 1 (2001) 186–192.
 M. Ciocoiu, D.S. Nau, M. Gruninger, Ontologies for integrating engineering applications, Trans. ASME, J. Comput. Inform. Sci. Eng. 1 (2001) 12–22.
 D. Svensson, J. Malmqvist, Strategies for product structure management of manufacturing firms, Trans. ASME, J. Comput. Inform. Sci. Eng. 2 (2002) 50–58.
 X.W. Xu, Q. He, “Striving for a total integration of CAD, CAPP, CAM and CNC” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 20 (2004) 101–109.
 Y.-S. Ma, “Research on PLM System Interoperability with a Feature-Object-Based Approach, Retrieved on 2/14/2016 from https://www.ualberta.ca/~yongshen/index_files/%5bMa%20Y%20S%202008%20PRD%5d.pdf
 R. Sudarsan, S.J. Fenves, R.D. Sriram, F. Wang, “A Product Information Modeling Framework for Product Lifecycle Management” Computer Aided Design Vol. 37 (2005), p.1399.
 L.H. Wang, W.M. Shen, H. Xie, J. Neelamkavil, A. Pardasani, “Collaborative Conceptual Design— State of the Art and Future Trends” Computer-Aided Design Vol.34 (2002), p. 981-996.
 W.F. Bronsvoort, A. Noort, “Multiple-View Feature Modelling for Integral Product Development”, Computer-Aided Design Vol. 36 (2004), p. 929-946.
 J. Gao, D.T. Zheng, N. Gindy, “Extraction of Machining Features for CAD/CAM Integration”, Int. J. of Adv. Manuf. Tech. Vol. 24 (2004), p. 573.B. Smith, “An approach to graphs of linear forms (Unpublished work style),” unpublished.
 R. Dhanapal R, “The Role of Knowledge in Next-generation Product Development Systems”, Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering MARCH 2001, Vol. 1, pp. 3-11
 D. Culler and W. Burd: “A Framework for Extending Computer Aided Process Planning to Include Business Activities and Computer Aided Design and Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) Data Retrieval, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing Vol. 23, pp. 339–350, Elsevier, 2007.
 K. Crow, “Computer Aided Process Planning”, DRM Associates Retrieved from http://www.npd-solutions.com/capp.html.
 R. W. Bourke, Maximizing the Value of Product Lifecycle Management and Enterprise Resource Planning, Retrieved from http:// www.bourkeconsulting.com/Internal.aspx?path=Publications, pp. 1-23.
 M. Grieves, Product Lifecycle Management, McGraw-Hill, 2006
 Dessault Systemes Web Site, Retrieved 3/20/2016 from http://www.3ds.com/products-services/catia/capabilities/.
 Advanced Integration Technologies Web Site, Retrieved 3/20/2016 from http://www.aint.com/home