Environmental Impacts of Point and Non-Point Source Pollution in Krishnagiri Reservoir: A Case Study in South India
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32804
Environmental Impacts of Point and Non-Point Source Pollution in Krishnagiri Reservoir: A Case Study in South India

Authors: N. K. Ambujam, V. Sudha

Abstract:

Reservoirs are being contaminated all around the world with point source and Non-Point Source (NPS) pollution. The most common NPS pollutants are sediments and nutrients. Krishnagiri Reservoir (KR) has been chosen for the present case study, which is located in the tropical semi-arid climatic zone of Tamil Nadu, South India. It is the main source of surface water in Krishnagiri district to meet the freshwater demands. The reservoir has lost about 40% of its water holding capacity due to sedimentation over the period of 50 years. Hence, from the research and management perspective, there is a need for a sound knowledge on the spatial and seasonal variations of KR water quality. The present study encompasses the specific objectives as (i) to investigate the longitudinal heterogeneity and seasonal variations of physicochemical parameters, nutrients and biological characteristics of KR water and (ii) to examine the extent of degradation of water quality in KR. 15 sampling points were identified by uniform stratified method and a systematic monthly sampling strategy was selected due to high dynamic nature in its hydrological characteristics. The physicochemical parameters, major ions, nutrients and Chlorophyll a (Chl a) were analysed. Trophic status of KR was classified by using Carlson's Trophic State Index (TSI). All statistical analyses were performed by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences programme, version-16.0. Spatial maps were prepared for Chl a using Arc GIS. Observations in KR pointed out that electrical conductivity and major ions are highly variable factors as it receives inflow from the catchment with different land use activities. The study of major ions in KR exhibited different trends in their values and it could be concluded that as the monsoon progresses the major ions in the water decreases or water quality stabilizes. The inflow point of KR showed comparatively higher concentration of nutrients including nitrate, soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), total phosphors (TP), total suspended phosphorus (TSP) and total dissolved phosphorus (TDP) during monsoon seasons. This evidently showed the input of significant amount of nutrients from the catchment side through agricultural runoff. High concentration of TDP and TSP at the lacustrine zone of the reservoir during summer season evidently revealed that there was a significant release of phosphorus from the bottom sediments. Carlson’s TSI of KR ranged between 81 and 92 during northeast monsoon and summer seasons. High and permanent Cyanobacterial bloom in KR could be mainly due to the internal loading of phosphorus from the bottom sediments. According to Carlson’s TSI classification Krishnagiri reservoir was ranked in the hyper-eutrophic category. This study provides necessary basic data on the spatio-temporal variations of water quality in KR and also proves the impact of point and NPS pollution from the catchment area. High TSI warrants a greater threat for the recovery of internal P loading and hyper-eutrophic condition of KR. Several expensive internal measures for the reduction of internal loading of P were introduced by many scientists. However, the outcome of the present research suggests for the innovative algae harvesting technique for the removal of sediment nutrients.

Keywords: Hyper-eutrophication, Krishnagiri reservoir, nutrients, NPS pollution.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1123903

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1572

References:


[1] Ohio EPA (State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency) “Sewage sludge use or disposal in Ohio-Calendar year 2002. Prepared by: Sewage sludge management program permits and compliance section Ohio EPA-Division of surface water”, Retrieved July 29, 2004, from http://www.epa.state.oh.us/dsw/sludge/2002_Annual_Sludge_Report_Summary.pdf.
[2] Walker, J. L., Younos, T. and Zipper, C.E. “Nutrients in Lakes and Reservoirs, Virginia Water Resources Research Centre”, VWRRC Special Report SR34-2007. Virginia Tech. 1-112, 2007.
[3] IHH Institute of Hydraulics and Hydrology “Report on sedimentation studies in Krishnagiri Reservoir Project (4th capacity survey)”, Water Resources Organisation, Government of Tamil Nadu. 2007.
[4] American Public Health Association (APHA) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste water, 20th edn., 1998.
[5] Carr, G, M. and Neary, J. P. “Water Quality for Ecosystem and Hunan Health”, United Nations Environment Programme Global Environment Monitoring System/Water Programme, ISBN 92-95039-10-6. 2006. Assessed from http://www.gemswater.org. on 26th March 2011.
[6] Sangpal, R. R., Kulkarni, U. D. and Nandurkar, Y. M. “An assessment of the physico-chemical properties to study the pollution potential of Ujjani reservoir, Solapur district, India”, ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science Vol. 6, No. 3, 2011.
[7] Gautam, B. and Bhattarai, B. “Seasonal Changes in Water Quality Parameters and Sediment Nutrients in Jagadishpur Reservoir, a Ramsar Site in Nepal Nepal”, Journal of Science and Technology. Vol. 9, pp. 149-156, 2008.
[8] Garg, R. K., Rao, R, J., Uchchariya, D., Shukla, G. and Saksena, D.N. “Seasonal variations in water quality and major threats to Ramsagar reservoir, India”, African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 61-76, 2010.
[9] Kaul, V. and Handoo, J. K. “Physicochemical characteristics of Nilnag-a high altitude forest lake in Kashmir and its comparison with valley lakes”, Proc. Indian National Sci. Acad. B., Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 528-541, 1980.
[10] Krishnan, J. R. “Investigation on hydrobiology and water quality parameters of periyar lake, Thekkady, Kerala”, Ph.D. Thesis. Environmental Science Research Lab, Department of Botany, St. Berchmans College, Changanacherry, Kerala, 2008.
[11] Sivakumar, K. and Karuppasamy, R. “Factors Affecting Productivity of Phytoplankton in a Reservoir of Tamilnadu, India. American-Eurasian Journal of Botany, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 99-103, 2008, ISSN 1995-8951.
[12] Hulyal, S. B. and Kaliwal, B. B. “Dynamics of phytoplankton in relation to physico-chemical factors of Almatti reservoir of Bijapur District, Karnataka State”, Environ Monit Assess, Vol. 153, pp. 45-59. 2009.
[13] Bakri, D. A. and Chowdhury, M. “Internal nutrient flux in an inland water supply reservoir, New South Wales, Australia”, Lakes & Reservoirs: Research and Management, Vol. 11, pp. 39-45, 2006.
[14] Karunakaran. N. “Eutrophication of Krishnagiri Reservoir Causes and Environmental Impacts”, Ph. D Thesis, Centre for Water Resources, Anna University. 2004.
[15] G´orniak. A., Grabowska. M., Jekatierynczuk-Rudczyk. E., Zielinskip., Suchowolec. T. “Long-term variations of phytoplankton primary production in a shallow, polyhumic reservoir”. Hydrobiologia, 506-509, 305-510. 2003.
[16] Sudha, V., and Ambujam, N. K. “Characterization of bottom sediments and phosphorus fractions in hyper-eutrophic Krishnagiri reservoir located in an agricultural watershed in India”, Environment, Development and Sustainability, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 481-496.2013.
[17] Silva, E. I. L. “Ecology of phytoplankton in Tropical Waters: Introduction to the topic and Ecosystem Changes from Sri Lanka”, Asian Journal of Water, Environmental and Pollution, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 25-35. 2006.
[18] Wetzel, R. G. “Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems”, 3rd ed. Academic Press (ISBN 0-12-744760-1), 2001.