Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30121
Democratization, Market Liberalization and the Raise of Vested Interests and Its Impacts on Anti-Corruption Reform in Indonesia

Authors: Ahmad Khoirul Umam

Abstract:

This paper investigates the role of vested interests and its impacts on anti-corruption agenda in Indonesia following the collapse of authoritarian regime in 1998. A pervasive and rampant corruption has been believed as the main cause of the state economy’s fragility. Hence, anti-corruption measures were implemented by applying democratization and market liberalization since the establishment of a consolidated democracy which go hand in hand with a liberal market economy is convinced to be an efficacious prescription for effective anti-corruption. The reform movement has also mandated the establishment of the independent, neutral and professional special anti-corruption agency namely Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) to more intensify the fight against the systemic corruption. This paper will examine whether these anti-corruption measures have been effective to combat corruption, and investigate to what extend have the anti-corruption efforts, especially those conducted by KPK, been impeded by the emergence of a nexus of vested interests as the side-effect of democratization and market liberalization. Based on interviews with key stakeholders from KPK, other law enforcement agencies, government, prominent scholars, journalists and NGOs in Indonesia, it is found that since the overthrow of Soeharto, anti-corruption movement in the country have become more active and serious. After gradually winning the hearth of people, KPK successfully touched the untouchable corruption perpetrators who were previously protected by political immunity, legal protection and bureaucratic barriers. However, these changes have not necessarily reduced systemic and structural corruption practices. Ironically, intensive and devastating counterattacks were frequently posed by the alignment of business actors, elites of political parties, government, and also law enforcement agencies by hijacking state’s instruments to make KPK deflated, powerless, and surrender. This paper concludes that attempts of democratization, market liberalization and the establishment of anti-corruption agency may have helped Indonesia to reduce corruption. However, it is still difficult to imply that such anti-corruption measures have fostered the more effective anti-corruption works in the newly democratized and weakly regulated liberal economic system.

Keywords: Vested interests, democratization, market liberalization, anti-corruption, leadership.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1339221

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 861

References:


[1] Aspinall, E., 2005, ‘Elections and the Normalization of Politics in Indonesia’, South East Asia Research, 13 (2), 117-56.
[2] Bliss C. and Di Tella R. 1997, ‘Does competition kill corruption?’, Journal of Political Economy, 105 (5), 1001-1023.
[3] Brinkerhoff, Derick W., 2000, ‘Assessing Political Will for Anti-Corruption Efforts: An Analytical Framework’, Public Administration and Development, 20, 239-252.
[4] Butt, Simon, 2012, Corruption & Law in Indonesia, Rutledge, London.
[5] Fariz, Donal (4 December 2013), Researcher on political corruption at Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW), (interviewee).
[6] Goel, R. K. and Nelson, M. A., 2005, ‘Economic Freedom Versus Political Freedom: Cross-Country Influences on Corruption’, Australian Economic Papers, 121-33.
[7] Graeff, P., and Mehlkop, G., 2003, ‘The impact of economic freedom on corruption: Different Patterns for Rich and Poor Countries,’ European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 605-20.
[8] Haarhuis, Caroline Klein and Rene Torenvlied, 2006, ‘Dimensions and Alignments in the African Anti-Corruption Debate’, Acta Politica, 41, 41-67.
[9] Hadiz, Vedi and Richard Robinson, 2005, ‘Neo-liberal Reforms and Illiberal Consolidations: The Indonesian Paradox’, Development Studies, 41 (2), 220-241.
[10] Hadiz, Vedi, 2006, ‘Corruption and Neo-liberal Reform: Markets and Predatory Power in Indonesia and Southeast Asia’ in Robinson, Richard (ed), 2006, The Neo-Liberal Revolution; Forging the Market State, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 79-97.
[11] Hamilton-Hart, Natasha, 2001, ‘Anti-Corruption Strategies in Indonesia’, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 37 (1), 65-82.
[12] Heryanto, Ariel and Vedi Hadiz, 2005, ‘Post-Authoritarian Indonesia’, Critical Asian Studies, 37 (2), 251-275.
[13] Hill, Hal, 1999, The Indonesian Economy in Crisis: Causes Consequences and Lessons, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore.
[14] Lindsey, Timothy, 2007, ‘Legal Infrastructure and Governance in Post Crisis Asia: the case of Indonesia’, in Lindsey T., 2007, Law Reform in Developing and Transitional States, Routledge, New York, 3-41.
[15] Malley, M, 2003, “New Rules, Old Structures and the Limits of Democratic Decentralization”, in E. Aspinal and Greag Fealy (eds), 2003, Local Power and Politics in Indonesia: Decentralization and Democratization, Singapore, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
[16] Mc Leod, R., 2005, ‘The Struggle to regain effective government under democracy in Indonesia’, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 41 (3), 367-86.
[17] McIntyre, Andrew, 1999, ‘Political Institutions and the Economic Crisis in Thailand and Indonesia, ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 15 (3), 362-72.
[18] Muqoddas, Busyro (23 November 2013), Deputy Chairman Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), (interviewee).
[19] Quah, J., 2009, ‘Combating Corruption in the Asia-Pacific Countries: What Do We Know and What Needs to be Done?’, International Public Management Review, 10 (1), 5-29.
[20] Quah, J., 2003, Curbing Corruption in Asia: A Comparative Study of Six Countries, Singapore, Eastern Universities Press.
[21] Rose-Ackerman, Susan, 1978, Corruption: A Study in Political Economy, New York, Academic Press.
[22] Saha, Shrabani and Jen-Je Su, 2012, ‘Investigating the Interaction Effect of Democracy and Economic Freedom on Corruption: A Cross-Country Quantile Regression Analysis’, Economic Analysis & Policy, 42 (3), 389-95.
[23] Schutte, Sofie Arjon, 2012, ‘Against the Odds: Anti-Corruption Reform in Indonesia’, Public Administration and Development, 32, 38-48.
[24] Snape, Fiona Roberto, 1999, ‘Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism in Indonesia’, Third World Quarterly, 20 (3), 589-602.
[25] Theobald, Robin, 2002, Corruption and Democratisation, London, Frank Cass.
[26] Treisman, D., 2000, ‘The causes of corruption: A cross-national survey’, Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 399-Q457.
[27] Umar, Bambang Widodo, “Polisi, Kekuasaan, dan Korupsi”, Kompas, 2 July 2013.
[28] Widoyoko, Danang (20 November 2013), Coordinator of Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW), (interviewee).
[29] Whitehead, Laurence, 2000, ‘High-Level Political Corruption in Latin America: A Transitional Phenomenon?’, in Tulchin, Joseph S., and Ralph H. Espach (Ed), 2002, Combating Corruption in Latin America, Washington DC, Woodrow Wilson Centre Press,107-129.
[30] Zulkifli, Arief (11 November 2013), Editor in Chief of TEMPO Magazine and Newspaper, (interviewee).