Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30127
A Theoretical Hypothesis on Ferris Wheel Model of University Social Responsibility

Authors: Le Kang

Abstract:

According to the nature of the university, as a free and responsible academic community, USR is based on a different foundation —academic responsibility, so the Pyramid and the IC Model of CSR could not fully explain the most distinguished feature of USR. This paper sought to put forward a new model— Ferris Wheel Model, to illustrate the nature of USR and the process of achievement. The Ferris Wheel Model of USR shows the university creates a balanced, fairness and neutrality systemic structure to afford social responsibilities; that makes the organization could obtain a synergistic effect to achieve more extensive interests of stakeholders and wider social responsibilities.

Keywords: USR, Achievement model, Ferris wheel model.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1123759

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 886

References:


[1] Amber Wigmore-Álvarez, Mercedes Ruiz-Lozano, “University social responsibility in the global context: an overview of literature”. Business & Professional Ethics Journal, Volume 31, March-April, 2012, pp. 475-498.
[2] Radiah Othman, Roslan Othman, “Higher education institutions and social performance: evidence from public and private Universities”. International Journal of Business and Society, Vol. 15 No. 1, 2014, 1 - 18
[3] Archie B Carroll, “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders”, Business Horizons, Volume 34, Issue 4, July-August, 1991, pp. 39-48.
[4] Aviva Geva, “Three models of corporate social responsibility: interrelationships between theory, research, and practice”. Business and Society Review. Volume 113, Issue 1, 2008, pp.1-41.
[5] Ahmad, J., “Can a university act as a corporate social responsibility (CSR) driver? An analysis”. Social Responsibility Journal, Volume 8, Issue 1, 2010, pp. 77-86.
[6] Nell J. Smelser. Dynamics of the contemporary university: growth, accretion, and conflict. University of California Press, 2013, pp. 5, 61.
[7] Hans Van Ginkel. Academic freedom and social responsibility—the role of university organisations. Higher Education Policy, Volume 15, 2002, pp.347-351.
[8] Manchester 2020 strategy. http://www.manchester.ac.uk/discover/vision/