High-Rises and Urban Design: The Reasons for Unsuccessful Placemaking with Residential High-Rises in England
High-rises and placemaking is an understudied combination which receives more and more interest with the proliferation of this typology in many British cities. The reason for studying three major cities in England: London, Birmingham and Manchester, is to learn from the latest advances in urban design in well-developed and prominent urban environment. The analysis of several high-rise sites reveals the weaknesses in urban design of contemporary British cities and presents an opportunity to study from the implemented examples. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to analyze design approaches towards creating a sustainable and varied urban environment when high-rises are involved. The research questions raised by the study are: what is the quality of high-rises and their surroundings; what facilities and features are deployed in the research area; what is the role of the high-rise buildings in the placemaking process; what urban design principles are applicable in this context. The methodology utilizes observation of the researched area by structured questions, developed by the author to evaluate the outdoor qualities of the high-rise surroundings. In this context, the paper argues that the quality of the public realm around the high-rises is quite low, missing basic but vital elements such as plazas, public art, and seating, along with landscaping and pocket parks. There is lack of coherence, the rhythm of the streets is often disrupted, and even though the high-rises are very aesthetically appealing, they fail to create a sense of place on their own. The implications of the study are that future planning can take into consideration the critique in this article and provide more opportunities for urban design interventions around high-rise buildings in the British cities.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1115324Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1385
 K., Al-Kodmany, 2011, Placemaking with tall buildings , (online), Available at
 N., Dempsey, 2008, Quality of the Built Environment in Urban Neighbourhoods, (online) Available at
 G., Cullen, 1961, The Concise Townscape, Architectural Press
 C., Alexander, H., Neis, A., Anninou, I., King, 1987, A New Theory of Urban Design, Oxford University Press, New York.
 Al-Kodmany, K., Ali, M., 2013, The Future of the City: Tall Buildings and Urban Design, WIT press.
 E., Karacor, 2014, PlaceMaking Approachment to Accomplish Social Sustainability, (online) Available at
 E., Sonmez, An Investigation of Placemaking in Downtown Tuscon, (online) Available at
 K., Al-Kodmany, 2013, Placemaking in the High-Rise City: Architectural and Urban Design Analysis, (online) Available at
 J., Skennar, 2010, Place management, community and cultural development, (online) Available at
 P., Røe, 2013, Analysing Place and Place-making: Urbanization in Suburban Oslo, (online) Available at
 X Fei,., L., Yu, 2013, Liveable Landscape In High-Rise and High-Density Built Environment For Health Promotion in Singapore, (online) Available at
 K.,Al-Kodmany, M., Ali, 2012,Skyscrapers and Placemaking: Supporting Local Culture and Identity, (online) Available at
 K., Yeang, 1999, The green skyscraper: the basis for designing sustainable intensive building, Munich-London-New York, Prestel
 E., Holden, I., Norland, 2005, Three Challenges for the Compact City as a Sustainable Urban Form: Houshold Consumption of Energy and Transport in Eight Residential Areas in the great Oslo Region. Urban studies 42, 2145-2166.
 Y., Tuan, 1974, Topophilia: a study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. ISBN 0139252487.
 K. Lynch, 1960, The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.