Reducing Defects through Organizational Learning within a Housing Association Environment

Authors: T. Hopkin, S. Lu, P. Rogers, M. Sexton

Abstract:

Housing Associations (HAs) contribute circa 20% of the UK’s housing supply. HAs are however under increasing pressure as a result of funding cuts and rent reductions. Due to the increased pressure, a number of processes are currently being reviewed by HAs, especially how they manage and learn from defects. Learning from defects is considered a useful approach to achieving defect reduction within the UK housebuilding industry. This paper contributes to our understanding of how HAs learn from defects by undertaking an initial round table discussion with key HA stakeholders as part of an ongoing collaborative research project with the National House Building Council (NHBC) to better understand how house builders and HAs learn from defects to reduce their prevalence. The initial discussion shows that defect information runs through a number of groups, both internal and external of a HA during both the defects management process and organizational learning (OL) process. Furthermore, HAs are reliant on capturing and recording defect data as the foundation for the OL process. During the OL process defect data analysis is the primary enabler to recognizing a need for a change to organizational routines. When a need for change has been recognized, new options are typically pursued to design out defects via updates to a HAs Employer’s Requirements. Proposed solutions are selected by a review board and committed to organizational routine. After implementing a change, both structured and unstructured feedback is sought to establish the change’s success. The findings from the HA discussion demonstrates that OL can achieve defect reduction within the house building sector in the UK. The paper concludes by outlining a potential ‘learning from defects model’ for the housebuilding industry as well as describing future work.

Keywords: Defects, new homes, housing associations, organizational learning.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1112111

References:

[1] Wilcox, S and Perry, J (2013) “UK Housing Review 2013 Briefing Paper”, Coventry: Chartered Institute of Housing.
[2] Holmans, A E (2013) New estimates of housing demand and need in England, 2011 to 2031. “Town and Country Planning Tomorrow Series Paper 16”, September.
[3] UKCES: UK Commission for Employment and Skills (2012). Sector Skills Insights: Construction. "Evidence Report", 50.
[4] HBS: Home Building Skills (2013) Preparing to deliver tomorrow’s new homes. "Home Building Skills Research Report 2013"
[5] HBF: Home Builders Federation (2015) HBF 2015 Results. (Online) http://www.hbf.co.uk/policy-activities/customer-satisfaction-survey/2015-results/ (30/3/2015).
[6] DCLG: Department for Communities and Local Government (2015) Live tables on house building - Statistical data sets - GOV.UK. (Online) Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/ attachment_data/file/282792/LiveTable209.xls (Accessed 18 September 2015).
[7] KPMG: Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler and Shelter (2014) Building the homes we need: A programme for the 2015 government, KPMG LLP, Switzerland.
[8] UK Government (2015) Policy Paper: Summer Budget 2015 (Online) Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/affordable-housing-supply (Accessed 18 September 2015).
[9] UK Government (2015) Policy Paper: Summer Budget 2015 (Online) Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/summer-budget-2015/summer-budget-2015 (Accessed 18 September 2015).
[10] NHF: National Housing Federation (2015) National Housing Federation responds to the Summer Budget 2015 (Online) Available at: http://www.housing.org.uk/press/press-releases/national-housing-federation-responds-to-the-summer-budget-2015/ (Accessed 18 September 2015).
[11] Social Housing (2014) If we don’t respond to the lack of funding we will stagnate (Online) Available at: http://www.socialhousing.co.uk/if-we-dont-respond-innovatively-to-a-lack-of-funding-we-will-stagnate/ 7005530.article (Accessed 18 September 2015).
[12] HouseMark (2012) Value for money in responsive and your repairs: HouseMark's repairs value for money tool kit, Coventry: HouseMark.
[13] Hopkin, T, Lu, S, Rogers, P and Sexton, M (2015) Detecting defects in the UK new-build housing sector: a learning perspective In: Raiden, A B and Aboagye-Nimo, E (Eds) Procs 31st Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-9 September 2015, Lincoln, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 1073-1082.
[14] Macarulla, M, Forcada, N, Casals, M, Gangolells, M, Fuertes, A and Roca, X (2013) Standardizing Housing Defects: Classification, Validation, and Benefits. “Journal of Construction Engineering and Management”, 139, 968-976.
[15] Auchterlounie, T (2009) Recurring quality issues in the UK private house building industry. “Structural Survey”, 27(3), 241-251.
[16] Roy, R, Low, M and Waller, J (2005) Documentation, standardization and improvement of the construction process in house building. “Construction Management and Economics”, 23(1), 57-67.
[17] Baiche, B, Walliman, N and Ogden, R (2006) Compliance with Building Regulations in England and Wales. “Structural Survey”, 24(4), 279-299.
[18] Davey, C., McDonald, J., Lowe, D., Duff, R., Powell, J. A. and Powell, J. E. (2006) Defects liability management by design. “Building Res. and Info.” 34(2), pp. 145-153.
[19] NAO: National Audit Office (2007) Homebuilding: Measuring Construction Performance, National Audit Office.
[20] NHBC Foundation (2011) Management of post-completion repairs: A best practice guide for home builders. “NF25”, Milton Keynes: NHBC Foundation.
[21] Hopkin, T, Lu, S, Rogers, P and Sexton, M (2014) Placing defects at the heart of high quality new homes: the learning perspective. In Raiden, A (Ed.), “30th ARCOM Conference” 1-3 September 2014, University of Portsmouth. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 1153-1162.
[22] Neilson, R E (1997) Collaborative technologies and organizational learning. Idea Group Publishing, London.
[23] Barlow, J and Jashapara, A (1998). Organizational learning and inter-firm “partnering” in the UK construction industry. “The Learning Organization”, 5(2), 86-98.
[24] Scott, S. and Harris, R. (1998) A methodology for generating feedback in the construction industry. “The Learning Organization”, 5(3), 121–127.
[25] Knauseder, I, Josephson, P and Styhre, A (2007) Learning approaches for housing, service and infrastructure project organizations, “Construction Management and Economics”, 25(8), 857-867.
[26] Ozorhon, B, Dikmen, I and Talat Birgonul, M (2005) Organizational memory formation and its use in construction. “Building Research and Information”, 33(1), 67-79.
[27] Berkhout, F Hertin, J and Gann, D (2006). Learning to adapt: organisational adaptation to climate change impacts. “Climatic Change”, 78, 135-156.
[28] Vashdi, D, Bamberger, P, Erez, M and Weiss-Meilik, A (2007) Briefing-Debriefing: Using a reflexive organizational learning model from the military to enhance the performance of surgical teams. “Human Resource Management”, 46(1), 115–142.
[29] Federal Aviation Administration (2009) A Practical guide to maintenance ASAP programs, ASIAS, Washington
[30] Hult, M and Lennung, S A (1980). Towards a definition of action research: a note and bibliography. “Journal of Management Studies”, 17(2), 241–250.
[31] Susman, G I and Evered, R D (1978) An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. “Administrative Science Quarterly”, 23(4), 582–603.
[32] Lu, S L and Sexton, M (2009) Innovation in small professional practices in the built environment. “Real Estate State Issues Book Series”. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford, UK.