Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 31793
Calcification Classification in Mammograms Using Decision Trees

Authors: S. Usha, S. Arumugam


Cancer affects people globally with breast cancer being a leading killer. Breast cancer is due to the uncontrollable multiplication of cells resulting in a tumour or neoplasm. Tumours are called ‘benign’ when cancerous cells do not ravage other body tissues and ‘malignant’ if they do so. As mammography is an effective breast cancer detection tool at an early stage which is the most treatable stage it is the primary imaging modality for screening and diagnosis of this cancer type. This paper presents an automatic mammogram classification technique using wavelet and Gabor filter. Correlation feature selection is used to reduce the feature set and selected features are classified using different decision trees.

Keywords: Breast Cancer, Mammogram, Symlet Wavelets, Gabor Filters, Decision Trees

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1397


[1] Majumder, R., Chaudhuri, B., Ghosh, A., Ledwich, G., & Zare, F. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2009. National Cancer Institute.
[2] Curtis, C., Shah, S. P., Chin, S. F., Turashvili, G., Rueda, O. M., Dunning, M. J., & Aparicio, S. (2012). The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature, 486(7403), 346-352.
[3] Perou, C. M., Sørlie, T., Eisen, M. B., van de Rijn, M., Jeffrey, S. S., Rees, C. A., & Botstein, D. (2000). Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature, 406(6797), 747-752.
[4] Tang, J., Rangayyan, R. M., Xu, J., El Naqa, I., & Yang, Y. (2009). Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer with mammography: recent advances. Information Technology in Biomedicine, IEEE Transactions on, 13(2), 236-251.
[5] Virnig, B. A., Tuttle, T. M., Shamliyan, T., & Kane, R. L. (2010). Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 102(3), 170-178.
[6] Wasif, N., Maggard, M. A., Ko, C. Y., & Giuliano, A. E. (2010). Invasive lobular vs. ductal breast cancer: a stage-matched comparison of outcomes. Annals of surgical oncology, 17(7), 1862-1869.
[7] S. Liu, C. F. Babbs, E. Delp, “Multiresolution detection of spiculated lesions in digital mammograms”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 10 (6), 2001,pp. 874–884.
[8] E. A. Rashed, I. A. Ismail, S. I. Zaki., “Multiresolution mammogram analysis in multilevel decomposition”. Pattern Recognition Letters 28, 2007, pp.286–292.
[9] A. Oliver, Automatic mass segmentation in mammographic images. PhD thesis, Universitat de Girona (2004)
[10] Campos, L. F. A. ; Barros, A. K. ; Silva, A. C. “Independent Component Analysis and Neural Networks Applied for Classification of Malignant, Benign and Normal Tissue in Digital Mammography”, In: Special Issue - Methods of Information in Medicine, v. 46, p. 212-215, 2007.
[11] Braz , G. Jr., E. C. Silva, A. C. Paiva and A. C. Silva, “Breast Tissues Classification Based on the Application of Geostatistical Features and Wavelet Transform”, In: International Special Topic Conference on Information Technology Applications in Biomedicine, ITAB 2007, 6th, 227-230, 2007.
[12] Domínguez, A. Rojas. Nandi, A. K. “Detection of masses in mammograms using enhanced multilevel thresholding segmentation and region selection based on rank”, In: Proceedings of the fifth conference on Proceeding of the Fifth IASTED International Conference: biomedical engineering. 2007
[13] Campos, L. F. A.; Costa, D. D.; Barros, A. K. “Segmentation on Breast Cancer Using Texture Features and Independent Component Analysis”, In: Bioinspired Cognitive Systems, BICS 2008.
[14] Suckling, J. et al. (1994). The mammographic image analysis society digital mammogram database, International Congress Series 1069 pp. 375–378.
[15] Ramanathan, R., Kalaiarasi, K., & Prabha, D. (2013). Improved wavelet based compression with adaptive lifting scheme using Artificial Bee Colony algorithm. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering & Technology (IJARCET), 2(4), pp-1549.
[16] J.G. Daugman, “Complete Discrete 2-D Gabor Transforms by Neural Networks for Image Analysis and Compression,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, Signal Processing, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1169-1179, 1988
[17] Wei, C. H., Li, Y., & Li, C. T. (2007, July). Effective extraction of Gabor features for adaptive mammogram retrieval. In Multimedia and Expo, 2007 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 1503-1506). IEEE.
[18] Guyon, I., & Elisseeff, A. (2003). An introduction to variable and feature selection. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 1157-1182.
[19] Pedersen, T. (2001, June). A decision tree of bigrams is an accurate predictor of word sense. In Proceedings of the second meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Language technologies (pp. 1-8). Association for Computational Linguistics.
[20] R. Holte. 1993. Very simple classification rules perform well on most commonly used datasets. Machine Learning, 11:63{91.
[21] Zhang, Y., Zhao, Y., A Comparison of BBN, ADTree and MLP in separating Quasars from Large Survey Catalogues, ChJAA 7, 289-296, 2007.
[22] Ganesan, K., Acharya, U. R., Chua, C. K., Min, L. C., & Abraham, T. K. (2014). Automated diagnosis of mammogram images of breast cancer using discrete wavelet transform and spherical wavelet transform features: A comparative Study. Technology in cancer research & treatment, 13(6), 605-615.