Investigation of Overstrength of Dual System by Non-Linear Static and Dynamic Analyses
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32821
Investigation of Overstrength of Dual System by Non-Linear Static and Dynamic Analyses

Authors: Nina Øystad-Larsen, Miran Cemalovic, Amir M. Kaynia

Abstract:

The nonlinear static and dynamic analysis procedures presented in EN 1998-1 for the structural response of a RC wall-frame building are assessed. The structure is designed according to the guidelines for high ductility (DCH) in 1998-1. The finite element packages SeismoStruct and OpenSees are utilized and evaluated. The structural response remains nearly in the elastic range even though the building was designed for high ductility. The overstrength is a result of oversized and heavily reinforced members, with emphasis on the lower storey walls. Nonlinear response history analysis in the software packages give virtually identical results for displacements.

Keywords: Behaviour factor, Dual system, OpenSEES, Overstrength, SeismoStruct.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1112061

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2013

References:


[1] De Normalisation, Comit´e Europ´een, Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance: Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, European Committee for Standardization, 2004.
[2] Cemalovic, Miran, Earthquake analysis og structures using non-linear models, Masters thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Department of Structural Engineering, 2015
[3] Priestley, M.J.N. and Calvi, G.M. and Kowalsky, M.J., Direct displacement-based seismic design of structures, 2007 NZSEE Conference, 2007.
[4] Kappos, A.J., Evaluation of behaviour factors on the basis of ductility and overstrength studies, Engineerning Structures, Volume 21, 1999.
[5] Asgarian, B. and Shokrgozar, H, Brbf response modification factor, Journal of constructional steel research, Volume 65, no. 2, pp. 290-298, 2009.
[6] SeismoStruct, SeismoStruct is a FEM-program developed for the analytical assessment of structures subjected to earthquake strong motion, Seismosoft Ltd, Version 7.0.2, 2015.
[7] OpenSees, The Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSees) is a software framework for simulating the seismic response of structural and geotechnical systems, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Version 2.4.5, 2013.
[8] Comit´e Europ´een de Normalisation, Eurocode 0: Basis of Structural Design, European Committee for Standardization, 2008
[9] Comit´e Europ´een de Normalisation, Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures: Part 1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings, European Committee for Standardization, 2010
[10] SHARE, European Seismic Hazard Map 2013, April, 2015, http://www.share-eu.org/node/90.
[11] Robot, Robot Structural Analysis Professional is an BIM-integrated FEM-software developed for the assessment of structural analysis and memeber design, Autodesk, Inc., Version 2.4.5, 2013.
[12] Calabrese, Armando and Almeida, Jo˜ao Pacheco and Pinho, Rui, Numerical issues in distributed inelasticity modeling of RC frame elements for seismic analysis, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Volume 14, 2010, Taylor & Francis.
[13] Cook, Robert D. and Malkus, David S. and Plesha Michael E. and Witt, Robert J., Concepts and applications of finite element analysis, John Wiley and Sons, INC., 4th edition, 2002.
[14] OpenSeesWiki, OpenSeesWiki is a Wiki creation. The goal is to provide information about OpenSees. http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/, 2015.
[15] Fajfar, Peter and Dol˘sek, Matja˘z, Pushover-based analysis in performance-based seismic engineering - A view from Europe, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2014.
[16] Goel, Rakesh K. and Chopra, Anil K., Evaluation of modal and FEMA pushover analyses: SAC buildings, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 20, Pages 225-254, 2004.
[17] Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, PEER Ground Motion Database, April, 2015, http://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/.
[18] Gharakhanloo, Armin, Distributed and Concentrated Inelasticity Beam- Column Elements used in Earthquake Engineering, 2014.
[19] Krawinkler, Helmut and Seneviratna, G.D.P.K., Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation, Engineering structures, Vol. 20, Page 452-464, 1998, Elsevier.
[20] Elghazouli, Ahmed, ed., Seismic design of buildings to Eurocode 8, CRC Press 2009.
[21] Applied Technology Council, FEMA-440 - Improvement of non-linear static seismic analysis procedures, Redwood City, 2005.