Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30455
Funding Innovative Activities in Firms: The Ownership Structure and Governance Linkage - Evidence from Mongolia

Authors: Ernest Nweke, Enkhtuya Bavuudorj

Abstract:

The harsh realities of the scandalous failure of several notable corporations in the past two decades have inextricably resulted in a surge in corporate governance studies. Nevertheless, little or no attention has been paid to corporate governance studies in Mongolian firms and much less to the comprehension of the correlation among ownership structure, corporate governance mechanisms and trend of innovative activities. Innovation is the bed rock of enterprise success. However, the funding and support for innovative activities in many firms are to a great extent determined by the incentives provided by the firm’s internal and external governance mechanisms. Mongolia is an East Asian country currently undergoing a fast-paced transition from socialist to democratic system and it is a widely held view that private ownership as against public ownership fosters innovation. Hence, following the privatization policy of Mongolian Government which has led to the transfer of the ownership of hitherto state controlled and state directed firms to private individuals and organizations, expectations are high that sufficient motivation would be provided for firm managers to engage in innovative activities. This research focuses on the relationship between ownership structure, corporate governance on one hand and the level of innovation on the hand. The paper is empirical in nature and derives data from both reliable secondary and primary sources. Secondary data for the study was in respect of ownership structure of Mongolian listed firms and innovation trend in Mongolia generally. These were analyzed using tables, charts, bars and percentages. Personal interviews and surveys were held to collect primary data. Primary data was in respect of corporate governance practices in Mongolian firms and were collected using structured questionnaire. Out of a population of three hundred and twenty (320) companies listed on the Mongolian Stock Exchange (MSE), a sample size of thirty (30) randomly selected companies was utilized for the study. Five (5) management level employees were surveyed in each selected firm giving a total of one hundred and fifty (150) respondents. Data collected were analyzed and research hypotheses tested using Chi-Square test statistic. Research results showed that corporate governance mechanisms were better and have significantly improved overtime in privately held as opposed to publicly owned firms. Consequently, the levels of innovation in privately held firms were considerably higher. It was concluded that a significant and positive relationship exists between private ownership and good corporate governance on one hand and the level of funding provided for innovative activities in Mongolian firms on the other hand.

Keywords: Innovation, Corporate Governance, ownership structure, stock exchange

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1111957

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1235

References:


[1] Marcela Miozzo & Paul Dewick, Building Competitive Advantage: Innovation and Corporate Governance in European Construction, 31 Res. poly 989, 990 (2002).
[2] Benn Lawson & Danny Samson, Developing Innovation Capability in Organizations: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach, Int'l j. innovation mgmt. 377, 382 (2001).
[3] Mario Calderini et al. Corporate governance, market structure and innovation 3 eds., 2003.
[4] Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd Edition, (OECD/Eurostat, 2005).
[5] Enkhtuvshin B.(2009), “National Innovation System of Mongolia”, on http://www.icsti.su/uploaded/200906/praha2009/mong_rpt.pdf
[6] David, P., B. Hall and A. Toole. 2000. Is public R&D a complement or sustitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29(4/5): 497 - 529.
[7] OECD Principles of corporate governance, 2004 ed., Preamble.
[8] About Corporate Governance.Available from http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/Topics_Ext_Content/IFC_External_Corporate_Site/Corporate+Governance (Accessed January 12th, 2016).
[9] http://www.tradingeconomics.com/mongolia/gdp-growth-annual (Accessed January 10th, 2016).
[10] http://www.theglobalEconomy.com.(Accessed December, 2015)
[11] http://www.theglobalEconomy.com (Accessed May 18, 2015).
[12] Dharwadkar, R., George, G., and Brandes, P. (2000). “Privatization inEmerging Economies: An Agency Theory Perspective,” Academy of Management Review, 25(3): 650–69.
[13] Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., and Jiang, Y. (2008). “Corporate Governance in Emerging Economies: A Review of the Principal–Principal Perspective,” Journal of Management Studies, 45(1): 196–220.
[14] Michael C. Jensen “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow: Corporate Finance, and Takeovers”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the Ninety- Eighth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association (May, 1986), pp. 323-329.