The “Ecological Approach” to GIS Implementation in Low Income Countries’ and the Role of Universities: Union of Municipalities of Joumeh Case Study

Authors: A. Iaaly, O. Jadayel, R. Jadayel

Abstract:

This paper explores the effectiveness of approaches used for the implementation of technology within central governments specifically Geographic Information Systems (GIS). It examines the extent to which various strategies to GIS implementation and its roll out to users within an organization is crucial for its long term assimilation. Depending on the contextual requirements, various implementation strategies exist spanning from the most revolutionary to the most evolutionary, which have an influence on the success of GIS projects and the realization of resulting business benefits within the central governments. This research compares between two strategies of GIS implementation within the Lebanese Municipalities. The first strategy is the “Technological Approach” which is focused on technology acquisition, overlaid on existing governmental frameworks. This approach gives minimal attention to capability building and the long term sustainability of the implemented program. The second strategy, referred to as the “Ecological Approach”, is naturally oriented to the function of the organization. This approach stresses on fostering the evolution of the program and on building the human capabilities. The Union of the Joumeh Municipalities will be presented as a case study under the “Ecological Approach” and the role of the GIS Center at the University of Balamand will be highlighted. Thus, this research contributes to the development of knowledge on technology implementation and the vital role of academia in the specific context of the Lebanese public sector so that this experience may pave the way for further applications.

Keywords: Ecological Approach, GIS, low income countries, technological approach.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1111857

References:

[1] E. Harison and A. Boonstra, “Essential competencies for technochange management: Towards an assessment model,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 29, pp. 283–294, 2009.
[2] J. Benamati and A. L. Lederer, “Rapid information technology change , and the emerging coping mechanisms , technologies group,” J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 183–202, 2001.
[3] C. Cegielski, B. Reithel, and C. Rebman, “Emerging information technologies : Developing a timely IT strategy,” J. ACM, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 113–117, 2005.
[4] S. Jackson and G. Philip, “A techno-cultural emergence perspective on the management of techno-change,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 445–456, Oct. 2010.
[5] S. F. Jooste, “Anew public sector in developing countries,” 2008.
[6] A. Schick, “Why Most Developing Countries Should Not Try New Zealand Reforms,” vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 123–131, 1998.
[7] G. Vonk, S. Geertman, and P. Schot, “New technologies stuck in old hierarchies : The diffusion of geo-information technologies in dutch public organization,” Public Adm. Rev., vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 745–756, 2007.
[8] X. Zhang, “The use of geographic information system in local government’s modernisation: A case study from the northwest of England,” Transform. Gov. People, Process Policy, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 206–222, 2012.
[9] R. Heeks, “Most e-government for development projects fail how can risks be reduced ?,” Manchester, UK, 2003.
[10] G. Al-waraqi and A. Zahary, “Critical factors of GIS projects failure in Yemeni governmental agencies,” in The 13th International Arab Conference on Information Technology ACIT, 2012, pp. 53–65.
[11] M. Batlouni, “Lebanon Relief and Redevelopment Project Government Institutions Strengthening Component Local Government and Parliament Project,” Lebanon, 2005.
[12] J. R. Eastman and J. Toledano, GIS technology transfer : An ecological approach, no. January. USA: Clark University, 1996.
[13] N. Obermeyer and J. K. Pinto, Managing geograpic information systems. London: The Guilford Press, 1994.
[14] L. Ramasubramanian, “Review article GIS implementation in developing countries : Learning from organisational theory and reflective practice,” Trans. GIS, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 359–380, 1999.
[15] K. T. Lance, “SDI evaluation and budgeting processes: Linkages and lessons,” in A multi-view framework to assess SDIs, J. Crmpvoets, A. Rajabifrad, B. Loenen, and T. Fernandez, Eds. Melbourne: Melbourne University, 2008, pp. 69–91.
[16] J. Petch and D. E. Reeve, GIS, organisations and people: A socio-technical approach. London: Taylor & Francis, 1999.
[17] K. Eason, Information technology of organizational change. London: Taylor and Francis, 1988.
[18] H. J. Campbell, “Institutional consequences of the use of GIS,” in Geographical Information Systems In Abridged, 2nd ed., R. P, Longley, M, Goodchild, D, Maguire, D, Ed. Wiley, 2005, pp. 621–632.
[19] R. Somers, “Developing GIS management strategies for an organization,” J. Hous. Res., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 157–178, 1998.
[20] R. Ferrari and H. Onsrud, “Understanding guidance on GIS implementation : A comprehensive literature review,” Maine, 1995.
[21] G. Camara, H. Onsrud, and A. Monterio, “Efficacious sustainability of GIS development within a low income country:The Brazilian experience.” Image Processing, Brazil, 2004.
[22] O. Jadayel and R. Ibrahim, “GIS: A Well Needed Technology for Development in Lebanon,” in Proceedings of the 25th Annual ESRI International User Conference, 2005.
[23] B. E. Mennecke and L. West, “Geographic information systems in Developing countries : Issues in data collection , implementation and management,” J. Glob. Inf. Manag., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 45–55, 2001.
[24] M. R. . Hussain, “Institutionalization aspects in the use of geographic information system ( GIS ),” J. Surv. Constr. Prop., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 67–81, 2011.
[25] P. L. Croswell, “Facing reality in GIS implementation: Lessons learned and obstacles overcome.,” Proc. URISA, vol. 4, pp. 15–28, 1989.
[26] H. Onsrud and J. K. Pinto, “Evaluating correlates of GIS adoption success & the decision process of GIS acquisition,” URISA J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 18–39, 1993.