Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30006
Comparative Study of IC and Perturb and Observe Method of MPPT Algorithm for Grid Connected PV Module

Authors: Arvind Kumar, Manoj Kumar, Dattatraya H. Nagaraj, Amanpreet Singh, Jayanthi Prattapati


The purpose of this paper is to study and compare two maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithms in a photovoltaic simulation system and also show a simulation study of maximum power point tracking (MPPT) for photovoltaic systems using perturb and observe algorithm and Incremental conductance algorithm. Maximum power point tracking (MPPT) plays an important role in photovoltaic systems because it maximize the power output from a PV system for a given set of conditions, and therefore maximize the array efficiency and minimize the overall system cost. Since the maximum power point (MPP) varies, based on the irradiation and cell temperature, appropriate algorithms must be utilized to track the (MPP) and maintain the operation of the system in it. MATLAB/Simulink is used to establish a model of photovoltaic system with (MPPT) function. This system is developed by combining the models established of solar PV module and DC-DC Boost converter. The system is simulated under different climate conditions. Simulation results show that the photovoltaic simulation system can track the maximum power point accurately.

Keywords: Incremental conductance Algorithm, Perturb and Observe Algorithm, Photovoltaic System and Simulation Results.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF


[1] The European Union climate and energy package, (The “20 – 20 – 20” package),
[2] D. JC. MacKay, “Sustainable Energy - Without the Hot Air”, UIT Cambridge, 2009. (Online). Available:
[3] “Trends in photovoltaic applications. Survey report of selected IEA countries between 1992 and 2009”, International Energy Agency, Report IEA-PVPS Task 1 T1-19:2010, 2010. (Online). Available:
[4] P. A. Lynn, Electricity from Sunlight: An Introduction to Photovoltaics, John Wiley & Sons, 2010, p. 238.
[5] “Sunny Family 2010/2011 - The Future of Solar Technology”, SMA product catalogue, 2010. (Online). Available: smaprosa/dateien/2485/SOLARKATKUS103936W.pdf
[6] L. Piegari, R. Rizzo, "Adaptive perturb and observe algorithm for photovoltaic maximum power point tracking," Renewable Power Generation, IET, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 317-328, July 2010.
[7] N. Femia, G. Petrone, G. Spagnuolo, M. Vitelli, "Optimizing sampling rate of P&O MPPT technique," in Proc. IEEE PESC, 2004, pp. 1945- 1949.
[8] T. Esram, P.L. Chapman, "Comparison of Photovoltaic Array Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques," IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 439-449, June 2007.
[9] L. Piegari, R. Rizzo, "Adaptive perturb and observe algorithm for photovoltaic maximum power point tracking," Renewable Power Generation, IET, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 317-328, July 2010.
[10] Murtaza, A.F. ; Fac. of Eng., Univ. of Central Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan ; Sher, H.A. ; Chiaberge, M. ; Boero, D. Comparative analysis of maximum power point tracking techniques for PV applications. Multi Topic Conference (INMIC), 2013 16th International.
[11] Jin-Gook Lee ; Dept. of Electr. Control Eng., Sunchon Nat. Univ., Sunchon, South Korea ; Jae-Sub Ko ; Da-Eun Jeong ; Dong-Hwa Chung, MPPT control of photovoltaic system using the two-mode IC method, Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), 2012 12th International Conference.
[12] K.H. Hussein, I. Muta, T. Hoshino, M. Osakada, "Maximum photovoltaic power tracking:an algorithm for rapidly changing atmospheric conditions," IEE Proceedings on Generation, Transmission and Distribution, vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 59-64, Jan 1995.
[13] H. Patel and V. Agarwal : "Maximum Power Point Tracking Scheme for PV Systems Operating Under Partially Shaded Conditions" IEEE Transaction on Industrial Electronics, Vol.55, No. 4, pp.1689-1698, 2008.