50/50 Oil-Water Ratio Invert Emulsion Drilling Mud Using Vegetable Oil as Continuous Phase

Authors: P. C. Ihenacho, M. Burby, G. G. Nasr, G. C. Enyi

Abstract:

Formulation of a low oil-water ratio drilling mud with vegetable oil continuous phase without adversely affecting the mud rheology and stability has been a major challenge. A low oil-water ratio is beneficial in producing low fluid loss which is essential for wellbore stability. This study examined the possibility of 50/50 oil-water ratio invert emulsion drilling mud using a vegetable oil continuous phase. Jatropha oil was used as continuous phase. 12 ml of egg yolk which was separated from the albumen was added as the primary emulsifier additive. The rheological, stability and filtration properties were examined. The plastic viscosity and yield point were found to be 36cp and 17 Ib/100 ft² respectively. The electrical stability at 48.9ºC was 353v and the 30 minutes fluid loss was 6ml. The results compared favourably with a similar formulation using 70/30 oil - water ratio giving plastic viscosity of 31cp, yield point of 17 Ib/100 ft², electrical stability value of 480v and 12ml for the 30 minutes fluid loss. This study indicates that with a good mud composition using guided empiricism, 50/50 oil-water ratio invert emulsion drilling mud is feasible with a vegetable oil continuous phase. The choice of egg yolk as emulsifier additive is for compatibility with the vegetable oil and environmental concern. The high water content with no fluid loss additive will also minimise the cost of mud formulation.

Keywords: Environmental compatibility, low cost of mud formulation, low fluid loss, wellbore stability.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1111693

References:

[1] Amanullah Md. (2005). Physio-Chemical Characterisation of Vegetable Oils and Preliminary Test Results of Vegetable Oil-based Muds. SPE/IADC (97008) Paper presented at the SPE/IADC Middle East Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition in Dubai. U.A.E September 12th-14th.
[2] American Petroleum Institute (2014). Recommended Practice for Field Testing Oil-Based Drilling Fluids, API Recommended Practice 13B-2. Fifth Edition.
[3] Apaleke A. S., Al-Majed A. and Hossain M. E. (2012). Drilling Fluid: State of The Art and Future TrendSPE (149555) Paper presented at the North Africa Technical Conference and Exhibition Petroleum in Cairo Egypt, February 20th-22th.
[4] Apaleke A. S., Al-Majed A. and Hossain M. E. (2012a). State of the Art and Future Trend of Drilling Fluid: An Experimental Study. SPE (153676) Paper presented at the SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference in Mexixo City, Mexico April 16th -18th.
[5] Aston, M., Mihalik, P. and Tunbridge, J. (2002). Towards Zero Fluid Loss Oil Based Muds. SPE (77446) Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in San Antonio, Texas 29 September-2 October.
[6] Fadairo, A. A., Adeyemi, G. A., Ameloko, A., Ogidigbo, E. and Airende, O. (2012) Environmental Impact Evaluation of a Safe Drilling Mud. Society SPE. (152865). Paper presented at the SPE Middle East Health, Safety, Security and Environmental Conference and Exhibition held in Abu Dhabi UAE. 2-4 April.
[7] Jha P., Matho V. and Saxena V. (2014) Emulsified Based Drilling Fluids: An Overview. International Journal of ChemTech Research CODEN (USA): ISSN:0974-4290 Vol.6 No4, pp2306-2315.
[8] Lyons W. (1996) Standard Handbook of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering. Gulf Publishing Houston Texas USA Vol 1 pp678
[9] Wagle V., Kulkami D., and Maghrabi S. SPE (2012) (158346) A Great Way to Make Your Invert Emulsion Fluids Green. Paper Presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in Perth Australia October 22nd -24th.