Debt Reconstruction, Career Development and Famers Household Well-Being in Thailand
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33123
Debt Reconstruction, Career Development and Famers Household Well-Being in Thailand

Authors: Yothin Sawangdee, Piyawat Katewongsa, Chutima Yousomboon, Kornkanok Pongpradit, Sakapas Saengchai, Phusit Khantikul

Abstract:

Debts reconstruction under some of moratorium projects is one of important method that highly benefits to both the Banks and farmers. The method can reduce probabilities for nonprofits loan. This paper discuss about debts reconstruction and career development training for farmers in Thailand between 2011 and 2013. The research designed is mix-method between quantitative survey and qualitative survey. Sample size for quantitative method is 1003 cases. Data gathering procedure is between October and December 2013. Main results affirmed that debts reconstruction is needed. And there are numerous benefits from farmers’ career development training. Many of farmers who attend field school activities able to bring knowledge learned to apply for the farms’ work. They can reduce production costs. Framers’ quality of life and their household well-being also improve. This program should apply in any countries where farmers have highly debts and highly risks for not return the debts.

Keywords: Career development, debts reconstruction, farmers household well-being, Thailand.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1111578

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1028

References:


[1] Ah Sarris, T. Doucha and E Mathjis. 1999. Agricultural restructuring in central and eastern Europe: Implications for competitiveness and rural development. European review of agricultural economics. Vol. 26, No. 3.
[2] Akinwumi A. Adesina and JojoBaiduForson. 1995. Farmers’ perceptions and adoption of new agricultural technology: Evidence from analysis in Burkina Faso and Guinea, West Africa. Agricultural Economics. Vol. 13, No. 1.
[3] Ampaire A. and Rothschild M.F. 2010. Effects of Training and facilitation of farmers in Uganda on livestock development.(online) Available from http://www.lrrd.cipav.org/lrrd22/7/ampa23038.html. (Accessed 2014 January)
[4] Catherine Benjamin and EuanPhimister. 2002. Does capital market structure affect farm investment? A Comparison using French and British farm-level panel date. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. Vol. 84, No. 4.
[5] ChuanHsin Huang. 2008. How to Grant Credit to Farmers Effectively: A Managerial Perspective. International Journal of management, Vol. 25, No. 2.
[6] Crop Life International. 2003. Training Through local partnerships. (Online). Available from http://www.croplifeorg. (Accessed 2014 January 10).
[7] David J. Spielman, Javier Ekboir, Kristin Davis and Cormas M.O. Ochieng. 2008. An innovation systems perspective on strengthening agricultural education and training Sub-Saharan Africa. Agricultural systems. Vol. 98. No. 1.
[8] FiBL. 2001. African organic agriculture traing manual: A resource manual for trainers. Edited by Grilles Weidmann and Lukas Kilcher. Research institute of organic agriculture FiBL, frick.
[9] Matt Lobley and Clive Potter. 2004. Agriculture change and restructuring: Recent evidence from a survey of agricultural households in England. Vol.20, No. 4.