Threats and Preventive Methods to Avoid Bird Strikes at the Deblin Military Airfield, Poland

Authors: J. Cwiklak, M. Grzegorzewski, M. Adamski

Abstract:

The paper presents results of the project conducted in Poland devoted to study on bird strikes at military airfields. The main aim of this project was to develop methods of aircraft protection against threats from birds. The studies were carried out using two methods. One by transect and the other one by selected sector scanning. During the research, it was recorded, that 104 species of birds in the number about of 36000 were observed. The most frequent ones were starling Sturnus vulgaris (31.0%), jackdaw Corvus monedula (18.3%), rook Corvus frugilegus (15.9 %), lapwing Vanellus vanellus (6.2%). Moreover, it was found, that starlings constituted the most serious threat. It resulted from their relatively high attendance at the runway (about 300 individuals). Possible repellent techniques concerning of the Deblin military airfield were discussed. The analysis of the birds’ concentration depending on the altitude, part of the day, year, part of the airfield constituted a base to work out critical flight phase and appropriate procedures to prevent bird strikes.

Keywords: Airport, bird strikes, flight safety, preventive methods.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1339089

References:

[1] Altman, J., 1974. Observational study of behavior sampling methods. Animal Behavior 49, 227–267.
[2] Brought, T., Bridgman, C.J., 1980. An evaluation of long grass as bird deterrent on British Airfields. Journal of Applied Ecology 17, 243–253.
[3] Busse P. (Ed.). 1990. Mały słownik zoologiczny. Ptaki. Wiedza Powszechna, Warszawa
[4] CAP 772, 2008 Birdstrike Risk Management for Aerodromes Civil Aviation Authority UK 2008 pp: 27-38
[5] Ćwiklak J., 2010, Bird strike hazard and mitigation techniques at the airport in Deblin, ISBN 97883-60908-88-4, pp: 59-143.
[6] Dekker A. 2000. Poor long grass: low bird density ground cover for the runway environment. Proceedings of International Bird Strike Conference 25: 227-236.
[7] Doc 9137 - AN/901I CAO Airport Services Manual Part 3 Wildlife Control and Reduction Fourth Edition – 2011, p: 25-33
[8] Dolbeeer, R.A., 2006. Height distribution of birds recorded by collisions with civil aircraft. Journal of Wildlife Management 70, 1345–1350.
[9] Dolbeer RA Cleary EC.,. 2005. Wildlife Hazard Management at Airports. A Manual for Airport Personnel. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Airport Safety and Standards. . DC.USA U.S.Washington, DC.
[10] Dzik T. and A. Kiernicki 2005, Ptaki - uzytkownicy przestrzeni powietrznej (Birds as Users of the Air Space), The Air Force Review No 8:21-36
[11] Kitowski I., Grzywaczewski G., Ćwiklak J., Grzegorzewski M., Krop S., 2011 Falconer activities as a bird dispersal tool at Deblin Airfield (E Poland) Transportation Research Part D 16 (2011) 82–86
[12] Skonieczny, M.F., 1997. Hunting synchrony in White –tailed Kites. Journal of Raptor Research 31, 79–81.
[13] Soldatini, C., Albores-Barajas, Y.V., Torricelli, P., Mainardi, D., 2008. Testing the efficacy of deterring system in two gull species. Applied Animal Behavioral Science 110, 330–340.
[14] Soldatini, C., Georgalas, V., Torricelli, P., Albores-Barajas, Y.V., 2010. An ecological approach to bird strike analysis. European Journal of Wildlife Research, doi: 10.1007/s10344-09-0359-z.