Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 31239
In Search of Innovation: Exploring the Dynamics of Innovation

Authors: Michal Lysek, Mike Danilovic, Jasmine Lihua Liu

Abstract:

HMS Industrial Networks AB has been recognized as one of the most innovative companies in the industrial communication industry worldwide. The creation of their Anybus innovation during the 1990s contributed considerably to the company’s success. From inception, HMS’ employees were innovating for the purpose of creating new business (the creation phase). After the Anybus innovation, they began the process of internationalization (the commercialization phase), which in turn led them to concentrate on cost reduction, product quality, delivery precision, operational efficiency, and increasing growth (the growth phase). As a result of this transformation, performing new radical innovations have become more complicated. The purpose of our research was to explore the dynamics of innovation at HMS from the aspect of key actors, activities, and events, over the three phases, in order to understand what led to the creation of their Anybus innovation, and why it has become increasingly challenging for HMS to create new radical innovations for the future. Our research methodology was based on a longitudinal, retrospective study from the inception of HMS in 1988 to 2014, a single case study inspired by the grounded theory approach. We conducted 47 interviews and collected 1 024 historical documents for our research. Our analysis has revealed that HMS’ success in creating the Anybus, and developing a successful business around the innovation, was based on three main capabilities – cultivating customer relations on different managerial and organizational levels, inspiring business relations, and balancing complementary human assets for the purpose of business creation. The success of HMS has turned the management’s attention away from past activities of key actors, of their behavior, and how they influenced and stimulated the creation of radical innovations. Nowadays, they are rhetorically focusing on creativity and innovation. All the while, their real actions put emphasis on growth, cost reduction, product quality, delivery precision, operational efficiency, and moneymaking. In the process of becoming an international company, HMS gradually refocused. In so doing they became profitable and successful, but they also forgot what made them innovative in the first place. Fortunately, HMS’ management has come to realize that this is the case and they are now in search of recapturing innovation once again. Our analysis indicates that HMS’ management is facing several barriers to innovation related path dependency and other lock-in phenomena. HMS’ management has been captured, trapped in their mindset and actions, by the success of the past. But now their future has to be secured, and they have come to realize that moneymaking is not everything. In recent years, HMS’ management have begun to search for innovation once more, in order to recapture their past capabilities for creating radical innovations. In order to unlock their managerial perceptions of customer needs and their counter-innovation driven activities and events, to utilize the full potential of their employees and capture the innovation opportunity for the future.

Keywords: barriers to innovation, dynamics of innovation, radical innovation, in search of excellence and innovation

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1338820

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2783

References:


[1] Hassbjer, N. 2003. Sweden's fastest growing manufacturing company (Online). Halmstad: HMS Industrial Networks AB. Available: http://www.anybus.com/readnews.asp?NID=26 (Accessed December 7th 2015).
[2] Anon. 2013. Frost & Sullivan New Product Innovation Award Conferred on HMS Industrial Networks for Anybus® NP40 (Online). London: Frost & Sullivan Institute. Available: http://www.frost.com/prod/servlet/press-release.pag?docid=278456976 (Accessed December 7th 2015).
[3] Mintzberg, H. 2009. Structures in fives: Designing effective organizations, Harlow, Pearson Education Ltd.
[4] Holt, N., Bremner, A., Sutherland, E., Vliek, M., Passer, M. & SMITH, R. 2012. Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behaviour, Maidenhead, McGraw-Hill Education Ltd.
[5] Mccraw, T. K. 2009. Prophet of Innovation - Joseph Schumpeter and Creative Destruction, Harvard, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
[6] Peters, T. J. & Waterman JR., R. H. 2015. In Search of Excellence - Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies, London, Profile Books Ltd.
[7] Tidd, J. & BESSANT, J. 2013. Managing Innovation - Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, Chichester, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
[8] Denning, S. 2011. Why Did IBM Survive? (Online). Forbes. Available: http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2011/07/10/why-did-ibmsurvive/ (Accessed August 18th 2015).
[9] Morris, L. 2011. The Innovat!on Master Plan - The CEO's Guide to Innovation, City of Walnut Creek, Innovation Academy.
[10] Lowe, A. 1998. Managing the post-merger aftermath by default remodelling. Management Decision, 36, 102-110.
[11] Arango, T. 2011. Hot Social Networking Site Cools as Facebook Grows (Online). The New York Times. Available: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/12/technology/internet/12myspace.htm l (Accessed October 10th 2015).
[12] Mui, C. 2012. How Kodak Failed (Online). Forbes. Available: http://www.forbes.com/sites/chunkamui/2012/01/18/how-kodak-failed/ (Accessed August 18th 2015).
[13] Cheng, R. 2014. Farewell Nokia: The rise and fall of a mobile pioneer (Online). CNET. Available: http://www.cnet.com/news/farewell-nokiathe- rise-and-fall-of-a-mobile-pioneer/ (Accessed August 18th 2015).
[14] Cringely, R. X. 2012. The Downfall of IBM (Online). BetaNews. Available: http://betanews.com/2012/04/27/the-downfall-of-ibm/ (Accessed August 18th 2015).
[15] Anon. 2014. Eclipsed by Apple: Electronics companies in Japan are starting to turn themselves around, but they are a shadow of their former selves (Online). Tokyo: The Economist. Available: http://www.economist.com/news/business/21606845-electronicscompanies- japan-are-starting-turn-themselves-around-they-are-shadow (Accessed June 17th 2015).
[16] Dougherty, D. & Heller, T. 1994. The Illegitimacy of Successful Product Innovation in Established Firms. Organization Science, 5, 200-218.
[17] Dougherty, D. 1990. Understanding New Markets for New Products. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 59-78.
[18] Cooper, R. G. 1979. The Dimensions of Industrial New Product Success and Failure. Journal of Marketing, 43, 93-103.
[19] Laux, V. 2015. Executive Pay, Innovation, and Risk-Taking. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 24, 275–305.
[20] Isaacson, W. 2011. Steve Jobs, Simon & Schuster.
[21] Graham, M. B. W. & Shuldiner, A. T. 2001. Corning and the Craft of Innovation, Oxford University Press.
[22] Gundling, E. 2000. The 3m Way to Innovation: Balancing People and Profit, Kodansha International Ltd.
[23] Gilbert, J. 1980. The World's Worst Aircraft, Coronet Books.
[24] Balasa, V. 2013. Failure Is Feedback: How 5 Billionaires had To Fail To Succeed (Online). Hongkiat. Available: http://www.hongkiat.com/blog/fail-to-succeed-billionaires/ (Accessed October 10th 2015).
[25] Miller, D. & Friesen, P. H. 1982. Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3, 1-25.
[26] Jones, M. V. & Dimitratos, P. 2004. Emerging Paradigms In International Entrepreneurship, Edward Elgar Publishing.
[27] Kumar, N., Scheer, L. & Kotler, P. 2000. From market driven to market driving. European Management Journal, 18, 129–142.
[28] Wohlsen, M. 2014. Larry Page Lays Out His Plan for Your Future (Online). Boone: Wired. Available: http://www.wired.com/2014/03/larry-page-using-google-build-futurewell- living/ (Accessed August 17th 2015).
[29] Cordeiro, A. S. & Vieira, F. D. 2012. Barriers to Innovation in SMEs: An International Comparison. II Conferência Internacional de Integração do Design, Engenharia e Gestão para a inovação - IDEMi 2012. Florianópolis, Brasil.
[30] Porter, M. E. 1979. How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57, 137-145.
[31] Lukjanska, R. 2011. Knowledge innovation hindering factors at Latvian enterprises. Library Review, 60, 68-79.
[32] Conner, K. R. & Prahalad, C. K. 1996. A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge versus Opportunism. Organization Science, 7, 477- 501.
[33] Dibrov, A. 2015. Innovation resistance: the main factors and ways to overcome them. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 92–96.
[34] Petersen, T. 2010. How to Overcome Barriers to Innovation: An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Personal Power Bases and Behavior in Different Barrier Situations. Druid-Dime Academy Winter 2010 PhD Conference. Aalborg, Denmark.
[35] Koberg , C. S., Uhlenbruck, N. & Sarason, Y. 1996. Facilitators of Organizational Innovation: The Role of Life-Cycle Stage. Journal of Business Venturing, 11, 133-149.
[36] Sundbo, J. n.d. Blocking mechanisms in user and employee based service innovation. Roskilde University.
[37] Madrid-Guijarro, A., Garcia, D. & Van Auken, H. 2009. Barriers to Innovation among Spanish Manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 47, 465-488.
[38] Mohnen, P. & Röller, L.-H. 2005. Complementarities in innovation policy. European Economic Review, 49, 1431–1450.
[39] Piatier, A. 1984. Barriers to innovation, London, Frances Pinter (Publishers) Ltd.
[40] Morgan, G. 2006. Images of Organization, Thousand Oaks, SAGE Publications Inc.
[41] Miller, D., Droge, C. & Toulouse, J.-M. 1988. Strategic Process and Content as Mediators between Organizational Context and Structure. The Academy of Management Journal, 31, 544-569.
[42] Spreitzer, G. M. & Mishra, A. K. 1999. Giving Up Control Without Losing Control: Trust and its substitutes' effects on manager's involving employees in decision making. Group & Organization Management, 24, 155-187.
[43] Allen, M. R., Adomdza, G. K. & Meyer, M. H. 2015. Managing for innovation: Managerial control and employee level outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 68, 371–379.
[44] Krueger, N. F. 1997. Organizational Inhibitions: Perceptual Barriers To Opportunity Emergence. Bozeman.
[45] Arthur, W. B. 1989. Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events. The Economic Journal, 99, 116-131.
[46] David, P. A. 1985. Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review, 75, 332-337.
[47] Janssen, M. & Jager, W. 1999. An integrated approach to simulating behavioural processes: A case study of the lock-in of consumption patterns. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2.
[48] Liebowitz, S. J. & Margolis, S. E. 2012. The Troubled Path of the Lock- In Movement. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 9, 125–152.
[49] Zeppini, P. & Van Den Bergh, J. C. J. M. 2011. Competing Recombinant Technologies for Environmental Innovation: Extending Arthur’s Model of Lock-In. Industry and Innovation, 18, 317–334.
[50] Aylward, D. 2006. Innovation lock-in: unlocking research and development path dependency in the Australian wine industry. Strategic Change, 15, 361–372.
[51] Kogut, B. & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology. Organization Science, 3, 383-397.
[52] Edwards, T. 2007. Organizational politics and the "process of knowing": Understanding crisis events duringproject-based innovation projects. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10, 391-406.
[53] Markard, J. & Truffer, B. 2008. Actor-oriented analysis of innovation systems: exploring micro-meso level linkages in the case of stationary fuel cells. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20, 443-464.
[54] Caiazza, R., Volpe, T. & Audretsch, D. 2014. Innovation in agro-food chain: Policies, actors and activities. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 8, 180-187.
[55] Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. & Saldana, J. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis - A Methods Sourcebook, Thousand Oaks, SAGE Publications, Inc.
[56] Silverman, D. 2013. Interpreting Qualitative Data, London, SAGE Publications Ltd.
[57] Christiansen, Ó. 2006. Opportunizing: A classic grounded theory study on business and management. Grounded Theory Review, 6.
[58] Glaser, B. G. 2005. The Grounded Theory Perspective III: Theoretical Coding, Mill Valley, The Sociology Press.
[59] Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R. & Lowe, A. 2002. Management Research: An Introduction, London, Thousand Oaks, and New Delhi, SAGE Publications Ltd.
[60] Hartman, J. 2001. Grundad teori - Teorigenerering på empirisk grund, Lund, Studentlitteratur.
[61] Glaser, B. G. 1998. Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions, Mill Valley, Sociology Press.
[62] Glaser, B. G. 1978. Theoretical Sensitivity - Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory, Mill Valley, San Francisco, The Sociology Press.
[63] Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: strategies for qualitative research, New Brunswick and London, AldineTransaction.
[64] Anon. 1993. Equipment for Machine Tools, SINUMERIK 805SM-TW Software Version 3, Interface Description, Part 2: Connection Conditions (Online). Siemens AG. Available: http://cncdubai.com/Manuals_Operation,Maintenance,Repair- CNC,PLC,Servo- Motors,Drives,Encoders,for_Dubai_Abudhabi_Arab_Kuwait_Oman_Qa tar_Saudi_Arab_Bahrain/sinumerik805/542_805SMTW% 20Interface%20Part%202%20Connection%20Conditions.pdf (Accessed April 15th 2015).
[65] Djiev, S. 2013. Industrial Networks for Communication and Control (Online). Available: http://anp.tusofia. bg/djiev/PDF%20files/Industrial%20Networks.pdf (Accessed April 14th 2015).
[66] Klasen, F., Oestreich, V. & Volz, M. 2011. Industrial Communication with Fieldbus and Ethernet, Berlin, Vde Verlag Gmbh.
[67] Lindell, M. 2012. Do Major Innovation Models Consider Unintended Consequences? Challenging the Innovation Paradigm. New York and London: Routledge.
[68] Godin, B. 2006. The Linear Model of Innovation. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 31, 639-667.
[69] Hobday, M. 2005. Firm-level Innovation Models: Perspectives on Research in Developed and Developing Countries. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17, 121–146.
[70] Marinova, D. & Phillimore, J. 2003. Models of Innovation. In: Shavinina, L. V. (ed.) The International Handbook on Innovation. 1 ed. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
[71] Rothwell, R. 1994. Towards the Fifth-generation Innovation Process. International Marketing Review, 11.
[72] Kline, S. J. & Rosenberg, N. 1986. An Overview of Innovation. The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
[73] Danilovic, M. 1997. Tvärdrag - Integrerad utvecklings- och produktionsverksamhet genom tvärfunktionellt arbetssätt. Linköping studies in science and technology. Linköping: Ekonomiska institutionen.
[74] Tripsas, M. 1997. Unraveling the Process of Creative Destruction: Complementary Assets and Incumbent Survival in the Typesetter Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 119–142.
[75] Popova, M. 2014. How to Master the Art of “Effective Surprise” and the 6 Essential Conditions for Creativity (Online). Brain Pickings. Available: https://www.brainpickings.org/2014/04/21/jerome-bruner-onknowing- left-hand-creativity/ (Accessed December 10th 2015).