A Linguistic Analysis of the Inconsistencies in the Meaning of Some -er Suffix Morphemes

Authors: Amina Abubakar

Abstract:

English like any other language is rich by means of arbitrary, conventional, symbols which lend it to lot of inconsistencies in spelling, phonology, syntax, and morphology. The research examines the irregularities prevalent in the structure and meaning of some ‘er’ lexical items in English and its implication to vocabulary acquisition. It centers its investigation on the derivational suffix ‘er’, which changes the grammatical category of word. English language poses many challenges to Second Language Learners because of its irregularities, exceptions, and rules. One of the meaning of –er derivational suffix is someone or somebody who does something. This rule often confuses the learners when they meet with the exceptions in normal discourse. The need to investigate instances of such inconsistencies in the formation of –er words and the meanings given to such words by the students motivated this study. For this purpose, some senior secondary two (SS2) students in six randomly selected schools in the metropolis were provided a large number of alphabetically selected ‘er’ suffix ending words, The researcher opts for a test technique, which requires them to provide the meaning of the selected words with- er. The marking of the test was scored on the scale of 1-0, where correct formation of –er word and meaning is scored one while wrong formation and meaning is scored zero. The number of wrong and correct formations of –er words meaning were calculated using percentage. The result of this research shows that a large number of students made wrong generalization of the meaning of the selected -er ending words. This shows how enormous the inconsistencies are in English language and how are affect the learning of English. Findings from the study revealed that though students mastered the basic morphological rules but the errors are generally committed on those vocabulary items that are not frequently in use. The study arrives at this conclusion from the survey of their textbook and their spoken activities. Therefore, the researcher recommends that there should be effective reappraisal of language teaching through implementation of the designed curriculum to reflect on modern strategies of teaching language, identification, and incorporation of the exceptions in rigorous communicative activities in language teaching, language course books and tutorials, training and retraining of teachers on the strategies that conform to the new pedagogy.

Keywords: ESL, derivational morpheme, inflectional morpheme, suffixes.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1338580

References:

[1] Akande, A. T (2003)Acquisition Of The inflectionalMorphemes By Nigeria Learners Of English Language Nordic Journal Of African Studies 12(3): 310–326
[2] Akande A. T. (2001). This grately improves Learners' Competence versus Morphological Appropriateness in the Acquisition of English Language. Ife studies in EnglishLanguage, vol. 5:38-48.
[3] Babalola, E. T., and Akande, A. T. 2002. Some linguistic problems of Yoruba learners of English in Nigeria. E S: Revista de Filologia Inglesa, No. 24: 245–257.
[4] Dulay, H. and Burt, M. 1974. Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language learning, 24: 37–53.
[5] Forster K. Chambers & I S. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627-635.
[6] Hammond, A. (2011) why is English spelling so irregular? Retrieved athttp://blog.esl-languages.spelling-complicated-irregular/
[7] Jarmilowicz, L. (2002). English Derivational Suffix Frequency and Children’s Stress Judgment. article in Brain and Language ·81,192–204 (2002)
[8] McNeill, A. (1996).Vocabulary Knowledge Profiles: Evidence from Chinese-speaking ESL teachers. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics 1: 39-63.
[9] Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and word frequency effect. Memory and Cognition, 7, 263-272
[10] Taft, M. & Forster, K. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 14, 638-647.
[11] Tardif, T., Shatz, M., &Naigles, L. (1997). Care giver speech and children’s usage of nouns versus verbs: A comparison of English, Italian, and Mandarin. Journal of Child Language, 24, 535–565.
[12] Tyler, A. Nagy, W. (1987). The Acquisition of English Derivational Morphology: In Center for the Study of Reading Technical Report No. 407; University Of Illinois, 2007.
[13] Wegryn, (2002)retrieved at WWW.Gradinggirl.com/achieves/365 April 13 2009