Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30379
Comparative Performance Analysis of Fiber Delay Line Based Buffer Architectures for Contention Resolution in Optical WDM Networks

Authors: Manoj Kumar Dutta


Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) technology is the most promising technology for the proper utilization of huge raw bandwidth provided by an optical fiber. One of the key problems in implementing the all-optical WDM network is the packet contention. This problem can be solved by several different techniques. In time domain approach the packet contention can be reduced by incorporating Fiber Delay Lines (FDLs) as optical buffer in the switch architecture. Different types of buffering architectures are reported in literatures. In the present paper a comparative performance analysis of three most popular FDL architectures are presented in order to obtain the best contention resolution performance. The analysis is further extended to consider the effect of different fiber non-linearities on the network performance.

Keywords: throughput, Non-Linearity, WDM network, contention resolution, optical buffering

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1312


[1] L. Xu, H.G. Perros, and G. Rouskas, “Techniques for Optical Packet Switching and Optical Burst Switching,” IEEE Comm. Magazine, pp. 136-142, 2001.
[2] S.L. Danielsen et al., “Analysis of a WDM Packet Switch with Improved Performance Under Bursty Traffic Conditions Due to Tunable Wavelength Converters,” J. Lightwave Technology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 729-735, 1998.
[3] G. Shen et al., “Performance Study on a WDM Packet Switch with Limited-Range Wavelength Converters,” IEEE Comm. Letters, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 432-434, 2001.
[4] Y. Yang, J. Wang, and C. Qiao, “Nonblocking WDM Multicast Switching Networks,” IEEE Trans. Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1274-1287, Dec. 2000.
[5] D.K. Hunter and I. Andronovic, “Approaches to Optical Internet Packet Switching,” IEEE Comm. Magazine, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 116- 122, 2000.
[6] C. Develder, M. Pickavet, and P. Demeester, “Assessment of Packet Loss for an Optical Packet Router with Recirculating Buffer,” Proc. Conf. Optical Network Design and Modeling, pp. 247- 261, 2002.
[7] W. Lin, R. S. Wolff and B.Mumey, “A Markov-Based Reservation Algorithm for Wavelength Assignment in All-Optical Networks,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol.25, No.7 ,pp. 1676-1683, July 2007.
[8] V. K. Chaubey, K. Divakar, “Modeling and simulation of WDM optical networks under traffic control protocols,” Optical Fiber Technology (Elsevier), Vol.15, pp. 95-99, Jan.2009.
[9] J. Li, C. Qiao, j. Xu and D. Xu, “Maximizing throughput for optical burst switching networks,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol.15, Issue 5, pp. 1163-1176, October 2007.
[10] M. K. Dutta, V. K.Chaubey, "Contention Resolution in Optical Burst Switching (OBS) Network: A Time Domain Approach", presented International Conference on Fiber Optics and Photonics 2012, December 09-12, 2012 in IIT Madras, Chennai, India.
[11] D. K. Hunter, M. C. Chia and I. Andonovic, “Buffering in optical packet switches, IEEE J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 16, pp. 2081-2094, Dec. 1998.
[12] M. G. Hluchyj and M. J. Karol, “Queueing in high-performance packet switching,” IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 6, pp. 1587-1597, Dec. 1988.