Performance Comparison between Conventional and Flexible Box Erecting Machines Using Dispatching Rules
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32799
Performance Comparison between Conventional and Flexible Box Erecting Machines Using Dispatching Rules

Authors: Min Kyu Kim, Eun Young Lee, Dong Woo Son, Yoon Seok Chang

Abstract:

In this paper, we introduce a flexible box erecting machine (BEM) that swiftly and automatically transforms cardboard into a three dimensional box. Recently, the parcel service and home-shopping industries have grown rapidly, and there is an increasing need for various box types to ship various products. However, workers cannot fold thousands of boxes manually in a day. As such, automatic BEMs are garnering greater attention. This study takes equipment operation into consideration as well as mechanical improvements in order to design a BEM that is able to outperform its conventional counterparts. We analyzed six dispatching rules – First In First Out (FIFO), Shortest Processing Time (SPT), Earliest Due Date (EDD), Setup Avoidance, EDD + SPT, and EDD + Setup Avoidance – to determine which one was most suitable for BEM operation. Consequently, SPT and Setup Avoidance were found to be the most critical rules, followed by EDD + Setup Avoidance, EDD + SPT, EDD, and FIFO. This hierarchy was valid for both our conventional BEM and our new flexible BEM from the viewpoint of processing time. We believe that this research can contribute to flexible BEM management, which has the potential to increase productivity and convenience.

Keywords: Automation, box erecting machine, dispatching rule, setup time.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1110618

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1455

References:


[1] Jae-Pack. (n.d.). Home page. Retrieved November 17, 2015, from http://www.jaepack.com
[2] Zhang, L., Mei, J., Zhao, X., Wang, P., & Wang, Y. (2007, August). Reformation of the transfusion bags' secondary packaging line using parallel robot. In Mechatronics and Automation, 2007. ICMA 2007. International Conference on (pp. 2043-2048). IEEE.
[3] Sun, X. F., Cheng, G., & Li, W. (2009, October). Study on work improvement in a packaging machine manufacturing company. In Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2009. IE&EM'09. 16th International Conference on (pp. 1155-1159). IEEE.
[4] Wang, Z., Zhang, Z. Y., Mei, J. P., Wang, L., Yu, D. X., & Zhang, L. A. (2011, April). Control system design of a case packing robot based on Simotion. In Electric Information and Control Engineering (ICEICE), 2011 International Conference on (pp. 240-244). IEEE.
[5] Ishii, N., & Talavage, J. J. (1994). A mixed dispatching rule approach in FMS scheduling. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 6(1), 69-87.
[6] Baykasoğlu, A., & Özbakır, L. (2010). Analyzing the effect of dispatching rules on the scheduling performance through grammar based flexible scheduling system. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(2), 369-381.
[7] Hicks, C., & Pongcharoen, P. (2006). Dispatching rules for production scheduling in the capital goods industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 104(1), 154-163.
[8] Christopher, J., M.E. Kuhl, and K. Hirschman, (2005) Simulation Analysis of Dispatching Rules for Automated Material Handling Systems and Processing Tools in Semiconductor Fabs, In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 84-87. IEEE (PDF File).