Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 31435
Using Analytic Hierarchy Process as a Decision-Making Tool in Project Portfolio Management

Authors: D. Danesh, M. J. Ryan, A. Abbasi


Project Portfolio Management (PPM) is an essential component of an organisation’s strategic procedures, which requires attention of several factors to envisage a range of long-term outcomes to support strategic project portfolio decisions. To evaluate overall efficiency at the portfolio level, it is essential to identify the functionality of specific projects as well as to aggregate those findings in a mathematically meaningful manner that indicates the strategic significance of the associated projects at a number of levels of abstraction. PPM success is directly associated with the quality of decisions made and poor judgment increases portfolio costs. Hence, various Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques have been designed and employed to support the decision-making functions. This paper reviews possible options to enhance the decision-making outcomes in organisational portfolio management processes using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) both from academic and practical perspectives and will examine the usability, certainty and quality of the technique. The results of the study will also provide insight into the technical risk associated with current decision-making model to underpin initiative tracking and strategic portfolio management.

Keywords: Analytic hierarchy process, decision support systems, multi-criteria decision-making, project portfolio management.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 3634


[1] K.A. Artto, P.H. Dietrich, M.I. Nurminen, Strategy implementation by projects, in: D.P. In: Slevin, Cleland, D.I., Pinto, J.K. (Ed.) Innovations: Project Management Research 2004, Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA, 2004, pp. 103–122.
[2] P. Dietrich, P. Lehtonen, Successful management of strategic intentions through multiple projects–Reflections from empirical study, International Journal of Project Management, 23 (2005) 386-391.
[3] P. Dietrich, J. Poskela, K.A. Artto, Organizing for managing multiple projects–a strategic perspective, The 17th Conference on Business Studies, Reykjavik, 2003, pp. 1–22.
[4] S. Meskendahl, The influence of business strategy on project portfolio management and its success—a conceptual framework, International Journal of Project Management, 28 (2010) 807-817.
[5] J.R. Turner, The handbook of project-based management: improving the processes for achieving strategic objectives, McGraw-Hill1993.
[6] D.I. Cleland, The strategic context of projects, Project Portfolio Management. Selecting and Prioritizing Projects forCompetitive Advantage. West Chester, PA: Center for Business Practices, DOI (1999).
[7] A. Webb, Managing innovative projects, Chapman & Hall1994.
[8] R. Cooper, S. Edgett, E.J. Kleinschmidt, J. Elko, Portfolio management for new product development: results of an industry practices study, Perseus Books, NY, 1998.
[9] M. Thiry, M. Deguire, Recent developments in project-based organisations, International journal of project management, 25 (2007) 649-658.
[10] S. Cicmil, T. Williams, J. Thomas, D. Hodgson, Rethinking project management: researching the actuality of projects, International Journal of Project Management, 24 (2006) 675-686.
[11] D. Jonas, Empowering project portfolio managers: How management involvement impacts project portfolio management performance, International Journal of Project Management, 28 (2010) 818-831.
[12] H.A. Levine, Project portfolio management: a practical guide to selecting projects, managing portfolios, and maximizing benefits, Chichester: Jossey- Bass; John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco, CA, 2005.
[13] L. Kester, A. Griffin, E.J. Hultink, K. Lauche, Exploring Portfolio Decision –Making Processes*, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28 (2001) 641-661.
[14] R.G. Cooper, S.J. Edgett, E.J. Kleinschmidt, Portfolio management for new product development: results of an industry practices study., R&D Management, 31 (2001) 361-380.
[15] N.P. Archer, F. Ghasemzadeh, An integrated framework for project portfolio selection, International Journal of Project Management, 17 (1999) 207-216.
[16] L. Crawford, Developing organizational project management capability: theory and practice, Project Management Journal, 37 (2006) 74-97.
[17] H. Maylor, T. Brady, T. Cooke-Davies, D. Hodgson, From projectification to programmification, International Journal of Project Management, 24 (2006) 663-674.
[18] C.P. Killen, R.A. Hunt, Dynamic capability through project portfolio management in service and manufacturing industries, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 3 (2010) 157-169.
[19] M. Martinsuo, P. Lehtonen, Role of single-project management in achieving portfolio management efficiency, International Journal of Project Management, 25 (2007) 56-65.
[20] C. Loch, Tailoring product development to strategy: case of a European technology manufacturer, European Management Journal, 18 (2000) 246-258.
[21] K.B. Kahn, G. Barczak, R. Moss, Perspective: establishing an NPD best practices framework, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23 (2006) 106-116.
[22] P. O'Connor, Spiral-up implementation of NPD portfolio and pipeline management, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2004, pp. 461-492.
[23] J.S. Pennypacker, Project portfolio management maturity model, Center for Business Practices, Havertown, DOI (2005).
[24] Project Management Institute, Organizational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3): Knowledge Foundation, Project Management Institute, 2008.
[25] D.N. Bridges, Project portfolio management: ideas and practices, Project portfolio management–selecting and prioritizing projects for competitive advantage. West Chester, PA, USA: Center for Business Practices, DOI (1999) 45-54.
[26] T. Cooke-Davies, P.C. Dinsmore, The right projects done right: from business strategy to successful project implementation, San Francisco: Josseybass, DOI (2006).
[27] B. Nelson, B. Gill, S. Spring, Project Portfolio Management: Selecting and Prioritizing Projects for Competitive Advantage, in: L.D. Dye, J.S. Pennypacker (Eds.), Center for Business Practices, Havertown, PA, 1999, pp. 87–94.
[28] R.A. Burgelman, Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research, Organization science, 2 (1991) 239-262.
[29] D. Miloševic, S. Srivannaboon, A theoretical framework for aligning project management with business strategy, 37 (2006) 98–110.
[30] T. Noda, J.L. Bower, Strategy making as iterated processes of resource allocation, Strategic Management Journal, 17 (1996) 159-192.
[31] S. Floricel, M. Ibanescu, Using R&D portfolio management to deal with dynamic risk, R&d Management, 38 (2008) 452-467.
[32] Y. Petit, Project portfolios in dynamic environments: Organizing for uncertainty, International Journal of Project Management, 30 (2012) 539-553.
[33] B. De Reyck, Y. Grushka-Cockayne, M. Lockett, S.R. Calderini, M. Moura, A. Sloper, The impact of project portfolio management on information technology projects, International Journal of Project Management, 23 (2005) 524-537.
[34] H.R. Kerzner, Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling, John Wiley & Sons2006.
[35] K.M. Eisenhardt, S.L. Brown, Time pacing: competing in markets that won't stand still, Harvard business review, 76 (1997) 59-69.
[36] K.M. Elsenhardt, J.A. Martin, Dynamic capabilities: What are they, Strategic management journal, 21 (2000) 1105-1121.
[37] J.E. Matheson, M.M. Menke, Using decision quality principles to balance your R&D portfolio, Research-Technology Management, 37 (1994) 38.
[38] R.G. Cooper, S.J. Edgett, E.J. Kleinschmidt, New product portfolio management: practices and performance, Journal of product innovation management, 16 (1999) 333-351.
[39] I.A. Ronkainen, Criteria changes across product development stages, Industrial Marketing Management, 14 (1985) 171-178.
[40] B. Aritua, N.J. Smith, D. Bower, Construction client multi-projects–A complex adaptive systems perspective, International Journal of Project Management, 27 (2009) 72-79.
[41] S. Collyer, C.M. Warren, Project management approaches for dynamic environments, International Journal of Project Management, 27 (2009) 355-364.
[42] O. Perminova, M. Gustafsson, K. Wikström, Defining uncertainty in projects–a new perspective, International Journal of Project Management, 26 (2008) 73-79.
[43] S. Elonen, K.A. Artto, Problems in managing internal development projects in multi-project environments, International Journal of Project Management, 21 (2003) 395-402.
[44] O. Dawidson, Project Portfolio Management-an organising perspective, Chalmers University of Technology2006.
[45] M.W. Dickinson, A.C. Thornton, S. Graves, Technology portfolio management: optimizing interdependent projects over multiple time periods, Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 48 (2001) 518-527.
[46] L. Kester, E.J. Hultink, K. Lauche, Portfolio decision-making genres: A case study, Journal of engineering and technology management, 26 (2009) 327-341.
[47] C.M. Christensen, Making strategy: Learning by doing, Harvard business review, 75 (1997) 141-156.
[48] A. De Maio, R. Verganti, M. Corso, A multi-project management framework for new product development, European Journal of Operational Research, 78 (1994) 178-191.
[49] C.P. Killen, R.A. Hunt, E.J. Kleinschmidt, Project portfolio management for product innovation, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 25 (2008) 24-38.
[50] J.H. Mikkola, Portfolio management of R&D projects: implications for innovation management, Technovation, 21 (2001) 423-435.
[51] R. Phaal, C.J. Farrukh, D.R. Probert, Technology management tools: concept, development and application, Technovation, 26 (2006) 336- 344.
[52] M. Rungi, Visual representation of interdependencies between projects, Proceedings of 37th International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering, Alexandria, Egypt, 2007, pp. 1061-1072.
[53] G.E. Blau, J.F. Pekny, V.A. Varma, P.R. Bunch, Managing a portfolio of interdependent new product candidates in the pharmaceutical industry, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21 (2004) 227-245.
[54] D. Verma, K.K. Sinha, Toward a theory of project interdependencies in high tech R&D environments, Journal of Operations Management, 20 (2002) 451-468.
[55] M. Danilovic, T.R. Browning, Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices, International Journal of Project Management, 25 (2007) 300-314.
[56] P. Nijkamp, P. Rietveld, H. Voogd, Multicriteria evaluation in physical planning, Elsevier2013.
[57] M. Zeleney, MCDM: Past Decade and Future Trends, A Source Book of Multiple Criteria Decision-Making., JAI Press Inc., Greenwich, 1984.
[58] A.F. Howard, A critical look at multiple criteria decision making techniques with reference to forestry applications, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 21 (1991) 1649-1659.
[59] R.L. Keeney, R.L. Keeney, Value-focused thinking: A path to creative decision-making, Harvard University Press2009.
[60] S. Hajkowicz, T. Prato, Multiple objective decision analysis of farming systems in Goodwater Creek watershed, Missouri, Center for Agricultural, Resource and Environmental Systems, College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources, University of Missouri- Columbia, USA. Research Report, 24 (1998).
[61] B.H. Massam, Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques in planning, Progress in planning, 30 (1988) 1-84.
[62] Y.Y. Haimes, W.A. Hall, Multiobjectives in water resource systems analysis: the surrogate worth trade off method, Water Resources Research, 10 (1974) 615-624.
[63] R.L. Keeney, Energy policy and value tradeoffs, IIASA1975.
[64] P. Haettenschwiler, Decision support systems applied to Swiss federal security policy and food supply., International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis Workshop, Laxenburg, Austria, 1994.
[65] R.L. Keeney, T.L. McDaniels, C. Swoveland, Evaluating improvements in electric utility reliability at British Columbia Hydro, Operations Research, 43 (1995) 933-947.
[66] F. Xu, T. Prato, J.C. Ma, A farm-level case study of sustainable agricultural production, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 50 (1995) 39-44.
[67] T. Prato, C. Fulcher, S. Wu, J. Ma, Multiple-objective decision making for agroecosystem management, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 25 (1996) 200-212.
[68] K. Hayashi, Multicriteria analysis for agricultural resource management: a critical survey and future perspectives, European Journal of Operational Research, 122 (2000) 486-500.
[69] R. Subbu, G. Russo, K. Chalermkraivuth, J. Celaya, Multi-criteria set partitioning for portfolio management: a visual interactive method, Computational Intelligence in Multicriteria Decision Making, IEEE Symposium on, IEEE, 2007, pp. 166-171.
[70] A. Kaboli, M.-B. Aryanezhad, K. Shahanaghi, I. Niroomand, A new method for plant location selection problem: a fuzzy-AHP approach, Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2007. ISIC. IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, 2007, pp. 582-586.
[71] W. Li, W. Cui, Y. Chen, Y. Fu, A group decision-making model for multi-criteria supplier selection in the presence of ordinal data, Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics, 2008. IEEE/SOLI 2008. IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, 2008, pp. 1686-1690.
[72] J. Ananda, G. Herath, Multi-attribute preference modelling and regional land-use planning, Ecological economics, 65 (2008) 325-335.
[73] P. Tan, S. Lee, A. Goh, An evaluation framework to identify suitable MCDM techniques for B2B collaboration, Service Operations and Logistics and Informatics (SOLI), 2010 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, 2010, pp. 446-451.
[74] S. Daichman, D. Greenberg, O. Pikovsky, J. Pliskin, How to make a right decision in health care: Multi criteria decision analysis in the healthcare system, Digital Technologies (DT), 2013 International Conference on, IEEE, 2013, pp. 75-80.
[75] G. Kou, Y. Peng, G. Wang, Evaluation of clustering algorithms for financial risk analysis using MCDM methods, Information Sciences, 275 (2014) 1-12.
[76] M. Kabak, M. Dağdeviren, Prioritization of renewable energy sources for Turkey by using a hybrid MCDM methodology, Energy Conversion and Management, 79 (2014) 25-33.
[77] S.A. Jozi, M.T. Shoshtary, A.R.K. Zadeh, Environmental risk assessment of dams in construction phase using a multi-criteria decisionmaking (MCDM) method, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 21 (2015) 1-16.
[78] L.L. Whyte, Hierarchical structures, The Research Methods Knowledge Base, Elsevier Scientific Publishing, New York, NY (USA), 1969.
[79] T.L. Saaty, The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resources allocation, New York: McGraw, DOI (1980).
[80] O.S. Vaidya, S. Kumar, Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications, European Journal of operational research, 169 (2006) 1-29.
[81] A. Arora, A.S. Arora, S. Palvia, Social Media Index Valuation: Impact of Technological, Social, Economic, and Ethical Dimensions, Journal of Promotion Management, 20 (2014) 328-344.
[82] N. Dedeke, Estimating the Weights of a Composite Index Using AHP: Case of the Environmental Performance Index, British Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 11 (2013) 199-221.
[83] R.K. Singh, H. Murty, S. Gupta, A. Dikshit, Development of composite sustainability performance index for steel industry, Ecological Indicators, 7 (2007) 565-588.
[84] M.M. Fouladgar, A. Yazdani-Chamzini, E.K. Zavadskas, S.H. Haji Moini, A new hybrid model for evaluating the working strategies: case study of construction company, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18 (2012) 164-188.
[85] T.L. Saaty, The analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes for the measurement of intangible criteria and for decision-making, Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys, Springer2005, pp. 345- 405.
[86] J.R. Miller III, The assessment of worth: a systematic procedure and its experimental validation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1966.
[87] J.R. Miller, Assessing alternative transportation systems, Rand Corporation1969.
[88] J.R. Miller, Professional Decision-Making: a procedure for evaluating complex alternatives, Praeger Publishers1970.
[89] G. Fechner, Elemente der Psychophysik (Vol. 2), Breitkopf und Härtel, DOI (1860).
[90] S.S. Stevens, On the psychophysical law, Psychological review, 64 (1957) 153.
[91] G.A. Miller, The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information, Psychological review, 63 (1956) 81.
[92] R.J. Calantone, C.A. Benedetto, J.B. Schmidt, Using the analytic hierarchy process in new product screening, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16 (1999) 65-76.
[93] Y. Hadad, M.Z. Hanani, Combining the AHP and DEA methodologies for selecting the best alternative, International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 9 (2011) 251-267.
[94] G. Hegde, P.R. Tadikamalla, Site selection for a ‘sure service terminal’, European Journal of Operational Research, 48 (1990) 77-80.
[95] M.J. Liberatore, An extension of the analytic hierarchy process for industrial R&D project selection and resource allocation, Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, DOI (1987) 12-18.
[96] J. Wallenius, J.S. Dyer, P.C. Fishburn, R.E. Steuer, S. Zionts, K. Deb, Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: Recent accomplishments and what lies ahead, Management Science, 54 (2008) 1336-1349.
[97] K. Wang, C.K. Wang, C. Hu, Analytic hierarchy process with fuzzy scoring in evaluating multidisciplinary R&D projects in China, Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 52 (2005) 119-129.
[98] J. Yang, H. Lee, An AHP decision model for facility location selection, Facilities, 15 (1997) 241-254.
[99] F. Zahedi, The analytic hierarchy process-a survey of the method and its applications, interfaces, 16 (1986) 96-108.
[100] N. Ahmad, D. Berg, G.R. Simons, The integration of analytical hierarchy process and data envelopment analysis in a multi-criteria decision-making problem, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 5 (2006) 263-276.
[101] E.H. Forman, M.A. Selly, Decision by objectives, World Scientific, London, 2001.
[102] E.H. Forman, S.I. Gass, The analytic hierarchy process-an exposition, Operations research, 49 (2001) 469-486.
[103] T.L. Saaty, A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, Journal of mathematical psychology, 15 (1977) 234-281.
[104] E. Loken, Use of multi-criteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems., Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11 (2007) 1584-1595.
[105] R.D. Kamenetzky, The Relationship between the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Additive Value Function*, Decision Sciences, 13 (1982) 702-713.
[106] J.O. Chang, A generalized decision model for naval weapon procurement: Multi-attribute decision making, University of South Florida, 2005.
[107] J.S. Shang, Multicriteria facility layout problem: An integrated approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 66 (1993) 291- 304.
[108] A. Zakarian, A. Kusiak, Forming teams: an analytical approach, IIE transactions, 31 (1999) 85-97.
[109] M.S. Ozdemir, R.N. Gasimov, The analytic hierarchy process and multiobjective 0–1 faculty course assignment, European Journal of Operational Research, 157 (2004) 398-408.
[110] K.M.A.-S. Al-Harbi, Application of the AHP in project management, International journal of project management, 19 (2001) 19-27.
[111] P. Leung, J. Muraoka, S.T. Nakamoto, S. Pooley, Evaluating fisheries management options in Hawaii using analytic hierarchy process (AHP), Fisheries Research, 36 (1998) 171-183.
[112] L.-A. Vidal, E. Sahin, N. Martelli, M. Berhoune, B. Bonan, Applying AHP to select drugs to be produced by anticipation in a chemotherapy compounding unit, Expert Systems with Applications, 37 (2010) 1528- 1534.
[113] E.H. Forman, Facts and fictions about the analytic hierarchy process, Mathematical and computer modelling, 17 (1993) 19-26.
[114] J. Pérez, J.L. Jimeno, E. Mokotoff, Another potential shortcoming of AHP, Top, 14 (2006) 99-111.
[115] E. Triantaphyllou, Two new cases of rank reversals when the AHP and some of its additive variants are used that do not occur with the multiplicative AHP, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 10 (2001) 11-25.
[116] C. Boender, J. De Graan, F. Lootsma, Multi-criteria decision analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparisons, Fuzzy sets and Systems, 29 (1989) 133-143.
[117] S.-J.J. Chen, C.-L. Hwang, M.J. Beckmann, W. Krelle, Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.1992.
[118] K. Sugihara, H. Tanaka, Interval evaluations in the analytic hierarchy process by possibility analysis, Computational intelligence, 17 (2001) 567-579.
[119] I. Millet, P.T. Harker, Globally effective questioning in the analytic hierarchy process, European Journal of Operational Research, 48 (1990) 88-97.
[120] D.J. Closs, M.A. Jacobs, M. Swink, G.S. Webb, Toward a theory of competencies for the management of product complexity: six case studies, Journal of Operations Management, 26 (2008) 590-610.
[121] C.H. Yeh, A Problem-based Selection of Multi-attribute Decisionmaking Methods, International Transactions in Operational Research, 9 (2002) 169-181.