Cooperative Learning: A Case Study on Teamwork through Community Service Project

Authors: Priyadharshini Ahrumugam

Abstract:

Cooperative groups through much research have been recognized to churn remarkable achievements instead of solitary or individualistic efforts. Based on Johnson and Johnson’s model of cooperative learning, the five key components of cooperation are positive interdependence, face-to-face promotive interaction, individual accountability, social skills, and group processing. In 2011, the Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) introduced the Holistic Student Development policy with the aim to develop morally sound individuals equipped with lifelong learning skills. The Community Service project was included in the improvement initiative. The purpose of this study is to assess the relationship of team-based learning in facilitating particularly students’ positive interdependence and face-to-face promotive interaction. The research methods involve in-depth interviews with the team leaders and selected team members, and a content analysis of the undergraduate students’ reflective journals. A significant positive relationship was found between students’ progressive outlook towards teamwork and the highlighted two components. The key findings show that students have gained in their individual learning and work results through teamwork and interaction with other students. The inclusion of Community Service as a MOHE subject resonates with cooperative learning methods that enhances supportive relationships and develops students’ social skills together with their professional skills.

Keywords: Community service, cooperative learning, positive interdependence, teamwork.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1110161

References:

[1] R.M. Felder, and Brent, R. “Cooperative Learning. In P.A. Mabrouk. (Ed.) “Active Learning: Models from the Analytical Sciences, Chapter 4, pp.35-53,Washington, DC : American Chemical Society, 2007.
[2] M .Tsay, and M. Brady, “A Case Study of Cooperative Learning and Communication Pedagogy: Does Working in Teams Make a Difference?” in Journal Of The Scholarship Of Teaching And Learning, 10(2), 2010, pp.78-89.
[3] D.W. Johnson, and R.T. Johnson, “Making cooperative learning work.” Theory into Practice, vol.38, no.2, 1999, pp.67-73 .
[4] R. E. Slavin, “Cooperative Learning and Academic Achievement: Why Does Groupwork Work?.” in Anales De Psicología, vol.3, no.3, 2014. 785.
[5] Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia, “Blueprint on Enculturation of Lifelong Learning for Malaysia 2011-2020”, 2011.
[6] N. Yusof, R. Hashim, J. Badusah, M.Konting, and C. Kian, “Communicating Change: The Five Sentiments of Change Perspective (Komunikasi Perubahan: Perspektif Lima Sentimen Perubahan”, in Jurnal Pengurusan (UKM Journal of Management), 35, 2012.
[7] S.K. W. Chu, N. Fong, and S.Y. Tan, “Applying outcomes-based teaching and learning framework in the BSc Information Management program in the Faculty of Education (Published Conference Proceedings style)” in Enhancing Learning Experiences in Higher Education: International Conference, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 2010,
[8] K. Tait, “Understanding Tertiary Student Learning: Are They Independent Thinkers or Simply Consumers and Reactors?” in International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, vol.2, no.1, 2009. pp.97-107.
[9] P. Ramsden, “Chapter 4: Approaches to learning.” in Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). RoutledgeFalmer, 2003.
[10] M. B. Baxter Magolda, “The Activity of Meaning Making: A Holistic Perspective on College Student Development (Periodical style),” in Journal Of College Student Development, vol. 50, no.6, November/December 2009, pp. 621–639.
[11] S. Habeshaw, G.Gibbs, and T. Habeshaw, 53 interesting things to do in your seminars and tutorials. Bristol: Technical and Educational Services, 1992.
[12] Y. Su, and L. Feng, “Commmunity service as a lifelong practice: Themes and hypotheses.” in International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, vol. 4, no. 4 ,Special Issue – February 2014, pp. 219- 226.
[13] E. Zhu, and D. Baylen, “From learning community to community learning: pedagogy, technology and interactivity.” in Educational Media International, vol.42, no.3, 2005, pp.251-268.
[14] J. Gillespie, “Enhancing social work education through team-based learning.” in Journal Of Social Work Education, no.2, 2012, 377.
[15] R. Huckman, and B.Staats, “The hidden benefits of keeping teams intact.” in Harvard Business Review, 2013, pp.27-29.
[16] The Foundation Coalition. “Positive interdependence, individual accountability, promotive interaction: Three pillars of cooperative learning”, 2006.