Experimental Investigation and Optimization of Nanoparticle Mass Concentration and Heat Input of Loop Heat Pipe

Authors: P. Gunnasegaran, M. Z. Abdullah, M. Z. Yusoff, Nur Irmawati

Abstract:

This study presents experimental and optimization of nanoparticle mass concentration and heat input based on the total thermal resistance (Rth) of loop heat pipe (LHP), employed for PCCPU cooling. In this study, silica nanoparticles (SiO2) in water with particle mass concentration ranged from 0% (pure water) to 1% is considered as the working fluid within the LHP. The experimental design and optimization is accomplished by the design of experimental tool, Response Surface Methodology (RSM). The results show that the nanoparticle mass concentration and the heat input have significant effect on the Rth of LHP. For a given heat input, the Rth is found to decrease with the increase of the nanoparticle mass concentration up to 0.5% and increased thereafter. It is also found that the Rth is decreased when the heat input is increased from 20W to 60W. The results are optimized with the objective of minimizing the Rth, using Design-Expert software, and the optimized nanoparticle mass concentration and heat input are 0.48% and 59.97W, respectively, the minimum thermal resistance being 2.66 (ºC/W).

Keywords: Loop heat pipe, nanofluid, optimization, thermal resistance.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1110009

References:

[1] D. X. Gai, Z. C. Liu, W. Liu, and J. G. Yang, “Operational characteristics of miniature loop heat pipe with flat evaporator,” Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 46, pp. 267-275, 2009.
[2] Yu. F. Maydanik, “Loop heat pipes,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 25, pp. 635-657, 2005.
[3] S. U. S. Choi, “Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles,” in Developments Applications of Non-Newtonian Flows, FED-vol. 231/MD-vol. 66, ASME: 99-105, edited by D. A. Siginer and H. P. Wang, New York, 1995.
[4] M. Shafahi, V. Bianco, K. Vafai, and O. Manca, “Thermal performance of flat-shaped heat pipes using nanofluids,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 53, pp. 1438–1445, 2010.
[5] M. Shafahi, V. Bianco, K. Vafai, and O. Manca, “An investigation of the thermal performance of cylindrical heat pipes using nanofluids,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 53, pp. 376–383, 2010.
[6] K. H. Do and S. P. Jang, “Effect of nanofluids on the thermal performance of a flat micro heat pipe with a rectangular grooved wick,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 53, pp. 2183–2192, 2010.
[7] P. Naphon, D. Thongkum, and P. Assadamongkol, “Heat pipe efficiency enhancement with refrigerant-nanoparticles mixtures,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 50, pp. 772-776, 2009.
[8] G. Franchi and X. Huang, “Development of Composite Wicks for Heat Pipe Performance Enhancement,” Heat Transfer Engineering, vol. 29 (10), pp. 873-884, 2008.
[9] D. Bas and I. H. Boyaci, “Modeling and optimization in usability of Response Surface Methodology (RSM),” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 78, pp. 836-845, 2007.
[10] M. J. K. Bashir, H. A. Aziz, M. S. Yusoff, and M. N. Adlan, “Application of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) for optimization of Ammoniacal Nitrogen removal from semi-aerobic landfill leachate using ion exchange resin,” Desalination, vol. 254, pp. 154-161, 2010.
[11] D. C. Montgomery, “Design and analysis of experiments,” 7th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2008.
[12] J. Qu and H. Wu, “Thermal performance comparison of oscillating heat pipes with SiO2/water and Al2 O3/water nanofluids,” International Journal of Thermal Sciences, vol. 50, pp. 1954-1962, 2011.
[13] Design-Expert Software Trial Version 6.0.7, User’s guide, 2008.