Development and Validation of Employee Trust Scale: Factor Structure, Reliability and Validity

Authors: Chua Bee Seok, Getrude Cosmas, Jasmine Adela Mutang, Shazia Iqbal Hashmi

Abstract:

The aim of this study was to determine the factor structure and psychometric properties (i.e., reliability and convergent validity) of the Employee Trust Scale, a newly created instrument by the researchers. The Employee Trust Scale initially contained 82 items to measure employees’ trust toward their supervisors. A sample of 818 (343 females, 449 males) employees were selected randomly from public and private organization sectors in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia. Their ages ranged from 19 to 67 years old with a mean of 34.55 years old. Their average tenure with their current employer was 11.2 years (s.d. = 7.5 years). The respondents were asked to complete the Employee Trust Scale, as well as a managerial trust questionnaire from Mishra. The exploratory factor analysis on employees’ trust toward their supervisor’s extracted three factors, labeled ‘trustworthiness’ (32 items), ‘position status’ (11 items) and ‘relationship’ (6 items) which accounted for 62.49% of the total variance. Trustworthiness factors were re-categorized into three sub factors: competency (11 items), benevolence (8 items) and integrity (13 items). All factors and sub factors of the scales demonstrated clear reliability with internal consistency of Cronbach’s Alpha above .85. The convergent validity of the Scale was supported by an expected pattern of correlations (positive and significant correlation) between the score of all factors and sub factors of the scale and the score on the managerial trust questionnaire, which measured the same construct. The convergent validity of Employee Trust Scale was further supported by the significant and positive inter-correlation between the factors and sub factors of the scale. The results suggest that the Employee Trust Scale is a reliable and valid measure. However, further studies need to be carried out in other groups of sample as to further validate the Scale.

Keywords: Employees trust scale, position status, psychometric properties, relationship, trustworthiness.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1109527

References:

[1] J.O. Whitney, The Trust Factor: Liberating Profits and Restoring Corporate Vitality, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
[2] R. Mayer, and Gavin, M. (2005), Trust in Management and Performance: Who Minds the Shop, in, R.C. Mayer and J.H., Davis The Effect of the Performance Appraisal System on Trust for Management: A Field Quasi Experiment, Journal of Applied Psychology, 1999, 84, pp. 123–136.
[3] K. T., Dirks and D. L., Ferrin, The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings. Organization Science, 2002, 12, pp. 450–467.
[4] R. Bies, and T., Tripp, ‘Beyond Distrust: “Getting Even” and the Need for Revenge,’ in Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, eds. R. Kramer and T. Tyler, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, pp. 246–260.
[5] S. L., Robinson, Trust and Breach of the Psychological Contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41, pp. 574–599.
[6] J. A., Colquitt, B. A., Scott, and J. A., LePine, Trust, Trustworthiness, and Trust Propensity: A Meta-Analytic Test of their Unique Relationships with Risk Taking and Job Performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 92, pp. 909–927.
[7] D. M., Rousseau, S. B. Sitkin, R. S., Burt, and E., Camerer, Not so Different after All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23, pp. 393–404.
[8] S., Aryee, P. S., Budhwar, and Z. X., Chen, Trust as a Mediator of the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Work Outcomes: Test of a Social Exchange Model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2002, 23, pp. 267–285.
[9] R., Mayer, J. H. Davis, and E. D., Schoorman, An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20 (3), pp. 709–734.
[10] A. C., Costa, Work Team Trust and Effectiveness. Personnel Review, 2003, 32, pp. 605-623.
[11] R., Bhattacharya, T. M., Devinney, and M. M., Pillutla, A Formal Model of Trust Based on Outcomes, Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23 (3), pp. 459-472.
[12] R., Hardin, Trust and Trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2002.
[13] R. J., Lewicki, D. J., McAllister, and R. J., Bies, Trust and Distrust: New Relationships and Realities. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23 (3), pp. 438-458.
[14] T., Yamagishi, The Structure of Trust (U. Kim, Y. Park, & S. Lee. Trans., Translated into Korean). Seoul Kyoyook Kwahaksa, 2000.
[15] T., Yamagishi, and M. Yamagishi, Trust and Commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 1994, 18, pp. 12916.
[16] U., Kim, and & Berry. Indigenous Psychology. (1993), Retrieved March 15, 2011, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_psychology.
[17] U., Kim, Indigenous, Cultural, and Cross-Cultural Psychology: Theoretical, Philosophical, and Epistemological Analysis. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2000, 3, pp. 265-287.
[18] Chua Bee Seok & Tan Cho Chiew. Trust, Trustworthiness and Justice Perception toward the Head of Department. Global Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences, 2013, 1, pp. 20-29.
[19] Chua Bee Seok, Shamsul Amri Baharuddin, Rosnah Ismail, Ferlis Bahari, Jasmine Adela Mutang, Lailawati Madlan, Asong Joseph. Malaysian Multi-Ethnic Discrimination Scale: Preliminary Factor and Psychometric Analysis. International Journal of Social, Education, Economics and Management Engineering, 2014. 8(12), 3830-3835.
[20] A. K., Mishra, Organizational Responses to Crisis: The Centrality of Trust. In R. Kramer and T. Tyler (eds.) Trust in Organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 1996, pp. 261-287.
[21] L. J., Cronbach, Essentials of Psychological Testing (5th Ed.). New York: Harper Collins Publishers. 1990.
[22] O., Chassany, P., Sagnier, P., Marquis, S., Fullerton, and N. Aaronson, European Issues Quality Life a: Patient-Reported Outcomes: The Example of Health-Related Quality of Life-A European Guidance Document for the Improved Integration of Health-Related Quality of Life Assessment in the Drug Regulatory Process. Drug Inf. Journal, 2002, 36, pp. 209–238.
[23] H. F., Kaiser. The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis. Psychometrika, 1958, 23, pp. 187–200.
[24] B., Thompson, Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Understanding Concepts and Applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2004.
[25] J. D., Hair, R. E., Anderson, R. L., Tatham, and W. C. Black, Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1998.
[26] G. Hofstede, Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. 1980.
[27] D. Robert, R. D. Costigan, R. C. Insinga, J. J. Berman, and S. S. Ilter, “The Effect of Employee Trust of the Supervisor on Enterprising Behavior: A Cross-Cultural Comparison,” Journal of Business and Psychology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 273-291, 2006.
[28] Y. T Wong, H. Ngo, and J. M. Wong, “Antecedents and Outcomes of Employees’ Trust in Chinese Joint Ventures,” Asia Pacific Journal of Management, vol. 20, pp. 481–499. 2003.
[29] Y. Han, Z. Peng, and Y. Zhu, “Supervisor–Subordinate Guanxi and Trust in Supervisor: A Qualitative Inquiry in the People’s Republic of China,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 108, pp. 313–324, 2012.
[30] Chua Bee Seok & Tan Cho Chiew. Trust, Trustworthiness and Justice Perception toward the Head of Department. Global Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences, 2013, 1, pp. 20-29.