University Students’ Perception on Public Transit in Dhaka City

Authors: Md. Mosabbir Pasha, Ijaj Mahmud Chowdhury, M. A. Afrahim Bhuiyan

Abstract:

With the increasing population and intensive land use, huge traffic demand is generating worldwide both in developing and developed countries. As a developing country, Bangladesh is also facing the same problem in recent years by producing huge numbers of daily trips. As a matter of fact, extensive traffic demand is increasing day by day. Also, transport system in Dhaka is heterogeneous, reflecting the heterogeneity in the socio-economic and land use patterns. Trips produced here are for different purposes such as work, business, educational etc. Due to the significant concentration of educational institutions a large share of the trips are generated by educational purpose. And one of the major percentages of educational trips is produced by university going students and most of them are travelled by car, bus, train, taxi, rickshaw etc. The aim of the study was to find out the university students’ perception on public transit ridership. A survey was conducted among 330 students from eight different universities. It was found out that 26% of the trips produced by university going students are travelled by public bus service and only 5% are by train. Percentage of car share is 16% and 12% of the trips are travelled by private taxi. It has been observed from the study, students those who prefer bus instead of other options, 42 percent of their family resides outside Dhaka. And those who prefer walking, of them, over 40 percent students’ family reside outside of Dhaka and of them over 85 percent students have a tendency to live in a mess. On the contrary, students travelling by car represents, most of their family reside in Dhaka. The study also revealed that the most important reason that restricts students not to use public transit is poor service. Negative attitudes such as discomfort, uneasiness in using public transit also reduces the usage of public transit. The poor waiting area is another major cause of not using public transit. Insufficient security also plays a significant role in not using public transit. On the contrary, the fare is not a problem for students those who use public transit as a mode of transportation. Students also think stations are not far away from their home or institution and they do not need to wait long for the buses or trains. It was also found accessibility to public transit is moderate.

Keywords: Traffic demand, fare, poor service, public transit ridership.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1109465

References:

[1] Bangladesh bureau of statistics. 2011. Bangladesh Population & Housing Census.
[2] Bangladesh Road Transport Authority, 2009. Number of registered vehicle, www.brta.gov.bd, accessed on 17 December, 2009.
[3] STP (2005), The Strategic Transport Plan for Dhaka, The Louis Berger Group Inc. and Bangladesh Consultants Ltd., Dhaka.
[4] Bachok, S., Osman, M. M., Ponrahono, Z., “Passenger’s Aspiration towards Sustainable Public Transportation System: Kerian District, Perak, Malaysia”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 153, pp.553 – 565, 2014.
[5] Sanchez, T. W., “The Connection between Public Transit and Employment: The Cases of Portland and Atlanta”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(3), 1999.
[6] Gong, H., Jin, W., “Analysis of Urban Public Transit Pricing Adjustment Program Evaluation Based on Trilateral Game” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 138, pp. 332-339, July 2014.
[7] Nasrudin, N., Rostam, K., Noor, H. M., “Barriers and Motivations for Sustainable Travel Behaviour: Shah Alam residents’ Perspectives”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, pp. 510-519, October 2014.
[8] Fu, X., Juan, Z., “Transit commuting market investigation using the latent segmentation Approach”, Travel Behaviour and Society, 2, pp. 102–108, 2015.
[9] Pronello, C., Camusso, C., “Travellers’ profiles definition using statistical multivariate analysis of attitudinal variables”, Journal of Transportation Geography, 19 (6), pp. 1294–1308, 2011.