Innovative Activity and Development: Analyzing Firm Data from Eurozone Country-Members

Authors: Ilias A. Makris

Abstract:

In this work, we attempt to associate firm characteristics with innovative activity. We collect microdata from listed firms of selected Eurozone Country-members, after the beginning of 2007 financial crisis. The following literature, several indicators of growth and performance were selected and tested for their ability to interpret innovative activity. The main scope is to examine the possible differences in performance and growth between innovative and non-innovative firms, during a severe recession. Additionally to that, a special focus will be held on whether macroeconomic performance and national innovation system, determines the extent of innovators' performance. Preliminary findings, through correlation matrices and non-parametric tests, strongly indicate the positive relation between innovative activity and most of the measures used (profitability, size, employment), confirming that even during a recessionary period, innovative firms not only survive but also seem to succeed better economic results in almost all indexes relative to non-innovative. However, even though innovators seem to perform better in all economies examined, the extent of that performance seems to be strongly affected by the supportive mechanisms (financial and structural) that their country provides. Thus, it is clear, that the technologically intensive 'gap' between European South and North, during the economic crisis, became chaotic, due to the harsh austerity measures and reduced budgets in those countries, even in sectors with high potentials in economic activity and employment, impairing the effects of crisis and enhancing the vicious circle of recession.

Keywords: Eurozone, innovative activity, development, firm performance, non-parametric tests.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1109249

References:

[1] OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013, OECD Publishing, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/sti_scoreboard-2013-en.
[2] I. A. Makris, “Innovative activity and firm performance: the case of euro zone periphery", World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Science Index 100, International Journal of Social, Education, Economics and Management Engineering, Vol.9, No.4, pp.1049-1052, 2015.
[3] R. Ferguson and C. Olofsson, “Science parks and the development of NTBFs: location, survival and growth,” Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 29, pp.5–17, 2004.
[4] G. Tselekidis, R. Rafailidis, I. Makris, and N. Vernardakis, “Globalization, technological flows and employment” (in Greek), Globalization and Modern Society, Special volume of National Centre for Social Research, Athens, pp. 199–218, 2003.
[5] I. A. Makris, “The factors affecting firms’ growth: investment in tangible versus intangible assets in the Greek pharmaceutical industry,” International Journal of Behavioural and Healthcare Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp.91–104, 2008.
[6] I. Hashi and N. Stojcicc, “The impact of innovation activities on firm performance using a multi-stage model: Evidence from the Community Innovation Survey 4,” Research Policy, vol. 42, pp. 353– 366, 2013.
[7] P. Koellinger, “The relationship between technology, innovation, and firm performance—Empirical evidence from e-business in Europe,” Research Policy, Vol.37, pp. 1317–1328, 2008.
[8] M. Kafouros, “R&D and productivity growth: evidence from the UK,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp.479– 497, 2005.
[9] E. Autio and A. Parhankangas, “Employment generation potential of new, technology-based firms during a recessionary period: the case of Finland,” Small Business Economics, vol. 11, pp.113–123, 1988.
[10] M. Bleaney, and K. Wakelin, “Efficiency, innovation and exports,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 64, No. 3, pp.3–15, 2002.
[11] I. Filatotchev, X. Liu, T. Buck, and M. Wright, “The export orientation and export performance of high-technology SMEs in emerging markets: the effects of knowledge transfer by returnee entrepreneurs,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 40, No. 6, pp.1005–1021, 2009.
[12] World data bank: databank.worldbank.org, accessed April 2015.
[13] Eurostat: ec.europa.eu/eurostat, accessed April 2015.
[14] European Commision, “Research and Innovation performance in EU Member States and Associated countries”, Innovation Union progress at country level, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, 2013, available at https://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/state-ofthe- union/2012/innovation_union_progress_at_country_level_2013.pdf, accessed January 2015.
[15] European Union, "Innovation Union Scoreboard 2014", available at http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/files/ius/ius- 2014_en.pdf, 2014 , accessed March 2015.
[16] S. K. Majumar, ‘The impact of size and age on firm-level performance: some evidence from India’, Review of Industrial Organization, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp.231–241, 1997.
[17] A. Coad, "Firm Growth: A Survey", papers in Economics and Evolution, Max Planck Institute of Economics, No.0703 (online), available at: https://papers.econ.mpg.de/evo/discussionpapers/2007-03.pdf, 2007.
[18] J. Wang, G. Meric, Z. Liu, and I. Meric, “Stock market crashes, firm characteristics and stock returns,” Journal of Banking and Finance, vol. 33, No. 9, pp.1563–1574, 2009.