The Effects of Placement and Cross-Section Shape of Shear Walls in Multi-Story RC Buildings with Plan Irregularity on Their Seismic Behavior by Using Nonlinear Time History Analyses

Authors: Mohammad Aminnia, Mahmood Hosseini

Abstract:

Environmental and functional conditions, sometimes, necessitate the architectural plan of the building to be asymmetric, and this result in an asymmetric structure. In such cases finding an optimal pattern for locating the components of lateral load bearing system, including shear walls, in the building’s plan is desired. In case of shear wall in addition to the location the shape of the wall cross-section is also an effective factor. Various types of shear walls and their proper layout might come effective in better stiffness distribution and more appropriate seismic response of the building. Several studies have been conducted in the context of analysis and design of shear walls; however, few studies have been performed on making decisions for the location and form of shear walls in multistory buildings, especially those with irregular plan. In this study, an attempt has been made to obtain the most reliable seismic behavior of multi-story reinforced concrete vertically chamfered buildings by using more appropriate shear walls form and arrangement in 7-, 10-, 12-, and 15-stoy buildings. The considered forms and arrangements include common rectangular walls and L-, T-, U- and Z-shaped plan, located as the core or in the outer frames of the building structure. Comparison of seismic behaviors of the buildings, including maximum roof displacement and particularly formation of plastic hinges and their distribution in the buildings’ structures, have been done based on the results of a series of nonlinear time history analyses, by using a set of selected earthquake records. Results show that shear walls with U-shaped cross-section, placed as the building central core, and also walls with Z-shaped cross-section, placed at the corners give the building more reliable seismic behavior.

Keywords: Vertically chamfered buildings, non-linear time history analyses, L-, T-, U- and Z-shaped plan walls.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1109203

References:

[1] A. M. Chandler and G. L. Hutchinson, “Torsional coupling effects in the earthquake response of asymmetric buildings”, Engineering Structures, 1986, 8(4), 222-236.
[2] M. Bosco, A. Ghersi, E. Marino, P. P. and Rossi, “Effects of in elevation irregularity on the elastic seismic response of in-plan asymmetric buildings”, Proceedings of the third European workshop on the seismic behaviour of irregular and complex structures, CD ROM, Florence, September 2002.
[3] S. H. Jeong, A. M. Mwafy and A. S. Elnashai, “Probabilistic seismic performance assessment of code-compliant multi-story RC buildings”, Engineering Structures, 2012, 34, 527-537.
[4] J. Wdowicki and E. Wdowicka, “Three-dimensional analysis of asymmetric shear wall structures with connecting and stiffening beams, Engineering Structures, 2012, 42, 362-370.
[5] A. Kaveh and P. Zakian, “Optimal seismic design of Reinforced Concrete shear wall-frame structures”, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2014, 18(7), 2181-2190.
[6] V. R. Harne, “Comparative Study of Strength of RC Shear Wall at Different Location on Multi-storied Residential Buildings, 2014.
[7] A. Kheyrodin and A. Mortezaie, "The analysis of linear and non-linear behaviors of shear walls", 2002.
[8] ASCE, “Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings (ASCE-41-06)”, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2007.
[9] M. Aminnia, “Optimizing shear walls in 7 to 15 stories RC building in High-seismic region on soil type III (in Persian), M.Sc. Thesis under supervision of Dr. Mahmood Hosseini, submitted to Tehran Central Branch of the Islamic Azad University (IAU), Tehran, Iran, 2014.