Judicial Institutions in a Post-Conflict Society: Gaining Legitimacy through a Holistic Reform

Authors: Abdul Salim Amin

Abstract:

This paper focuses on how judiciaries in post-conflict societies can gain legitimacy through reformation. Legitimacy plays a pivotal role in shaping people’s behavior to submit to the law and verifies the rightfulness of an organ for taking binding decisions. Among various dynamics, judicial independence, access to justice and behavioral changes of the judicial officials broadly contribute to legitimation of judiciary in general, and the courts in particular. Increasing independence of judiciary through reform limits, inter alia, government interference in judicial issues and protects basic rights of the citizens. Judicial independence does not only matter in institutional terms, individual independence also influences the impartiality and integrity of judges, which can be increased through education and better administration of justice. Finally, access to justice as an intertwined concept both at the legal and moral spectrum of judicial reform avails justice to the citizens and increases the level of public trust and confidence. Efficient legal decisions on fostering such elements through holistic reform create a rule of law atmosphere. Citizens neither accept an illegitimate judiciary nor do they trust its decisions. Lack of such tolerance and confidence deters the rule of law and thus, undermines the democratic development of a society.

Keywords: Legitimacy, judicial reform, judicial independence, access to justice, legal training, informal justice, rule of law.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1109135

References:

[1] Agreement on provisional arrangements in afghanistan pending the reestablishment of permanent government institutions ("Bonn Agreement", December 5, 2001) (s.n.), 2001.
[2] A. Hyde, The concept of legitimation in the sociology of law, Wisconsin law review Wisconsin law review, vol. 1983, 1983.
[3] Angeline Lewis, Judicial Reconstruction and the Rule of Law: Reassessing Military Intervention in Iraq, NIJHOFF Publishers, 2012, p. 83.
[4] Balakrishnan Rajagopal, Corruption, legitimacy and human rights : the dialectic of the relationship, Connecticut journal of international law Connecticut journal of international law, vol. 14, (1999).
[5] Caroline Sage and Michael Woolcock Leila Chirayath, Customary Law and Policy Reform: Engaging with the Plurality of Justice Systems, World Bank, 2005.
[6] D. Beetham, The legitimation of power, Humanities Press International, 1991, p. 6, 16.
[7] D. Shestowsky, The Psychology of Procedural preference: How Litigants Evaluate legal Procedures ex ante, Iowa Law Review, vol. 99, 2014, p. 7.
[8] E. Rasmusen, Judicial Legitimacy as a Repeated Game, Journals of Law. Economic & Organization, vol. 10, 1994.
[9] D. Freestone, A. C. Dakolias Maria, P. Kyle, Legal and judicial reform : strategic directions, The World Bank 2003, p. 732.
[10] G. W. Lindquist S. A. Bradbury M. D. Dougherty, Evaluating Performance in State Judicial Institutions: Trust and Confidence in the Georgia Judiciary, State & local government review, vol. 38, 2006, Pp. 179-181.
[11] G. Andrew, Legitimacy Matters: Managing the Democratization Paradox of Foreign State Building in Bosnia Herzegovina, Southeast Europe. Journal of Politics and Society,vol. n.a, 2012.
[12] R. Grafstein, The Legitimacy of Political Institutions, Polity, vol. 14, p. 51, 1981.
[13] International Crisis Group, Afghanistan: judicial reform and transitional justice, International Crisis Group, 2003, p. 12-14.
[14] B.Gulley, The Meaning and Measure of State legitimacy: Results for Countries, European Jouran lof Political Research, vol. 72, Pp. n.a, 2006.
[15] H. E. Chodosh, Reforming Judicial Reform Inspired by U.S. Models, 52 De Paul law review, vol. 52, 2002, p. 361.
[16] I. F.I. Shihata, Complementary Reform: Essays on Legal, Judicial and Other Institutional Reforms Supported by the World Bankc, Kluwer Law Interntional. 1997).
[17] I. R. Kaufman, Judicial Reform in the Next Century, 29 Stanlawrevi Stanford Law Review, vol. 1976, Pp. 2-17.
[18] J. O. N. Garthoff, Legitimacy Is Not Authority, Lawphilosophy Law and Philosophy, vol. 29 (2010).
[19] J.L.M. Gribnau, Legitimacy of the Judicary, 6 Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 6, 2002.
[20] J. L. Caldeira Gregory A. Baird Vanessa A. Gibson, On the Legitimacy of National High Courts, 92 The American political science review, vol. 92, 1998, p. 343.
[21] J. L. Caldeira Gregory A. Gibson, Judicial Impartiality, Campaign Contributions, and Recusals: Results from a National Survey, 10 JELS Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, vol. 10, 2013.
[22] J. L. Gibson, Challenges to the Impartiality of State Supreme Courts: Legitimacy Theory and "New-Style" Judicial Campaigns, 102 The American Political Science Review, vol. 102, 2008.
[23] J. L. Gibson, Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance, 23 Law and Society Review, vol 23, Pp. n.a, 1989.
[24] J. P. Vergne, Toward a New Measure of Organizational Legitimacy: Method, Validation, and Illustration, Organizational Research Methods, vol. 14, p. 484, 2011.
[25] J. Fagan, Legitimacy and Criminal Justice, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, vol. 6, p. 123, 2008-2009.
[26] J. M. Ngugi, Policing Neo-Liberal Reforms: The Rule of Law as an Enabling and Restrictive Discourse, 26 University of Pennsylvania journal of international economic law, vol. 26, 2005, Pp. 540-541.
[27] J. J. Mike Hough, B. Bradford, A. Myhill and Paul Quinton, Procedural Justice, Trust, and Institutional Legitimacy, Policing, vol. 4, 2010, p. 4.
[28] Jr. R. H. Fallon, Legitimacy and the Constitution, Harvard Law Review, vol. 118, 2005, Pp. 1794-1795.
[29] L. Grenfell, Promoting the rule of law in post-conflict states, 2013, Pp. 5-6, 20-21.
[30] L. B. Solum, Articles & Commentary - Procedural Justice, 78 Southern California law review, vol. 78, 2004.
[31] L. A. Hammergren, Envisioning reform improving judicial performance in Latin America, Pennsylvania State University Press (2007), available at http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nle bk&db=nlabk&AN=189854.
[32] M. E. Fellow J. Monnet, European University Institute Law Department Cain, Beyond informal justice, European University Institute, 1984.
[33] M. Nollkaemper, A. Peerenboom & R. P. Zürn, Rule of law dynamics: in an era of international and transnational governance, Cambridge University Press, 2012, p. 113, 243, 115, 116, 6.
[34] P. C. Magalhaes, The Politics of Judicial Reform in Eastern Europe, 32 Comparative Politics -New York, 1999, p. 46.
[35] Programme United Nations Development, National human development report, National human development report, 2007, p. 6.
[36] R. E. Messick, Judicial reform and economic development: a survey of the issues, World Bank research observer, vol. 14, 1999, p.118.
[37] R. Sannerholm, Legal, Judicial and Administrative Reforms in PostConflict Societies: Beyond the Rule of Law Template, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Vol. 12, 2007, Pp. 67-76.
[38] R. C. Laver, The World Bank and Judicial Reform: Overcoming Blind Spots in the Approach to Judicial Independence, Duke journal of comparative & international law, vol. 22, 2012, Pp. 192, 196.
[39] R. Wolfrum & R. Volker, Legitimacy in international law, ed., Springer, 2008, p. 23, papa. 4.
[40] Schaeffer W. G., Management in the Judiciary, American Society for Public Administration, vol. 13, 1953.
[41] S. O. Hogan, The Judicial Branch of the Government: People, Process, and Politics, ABC CLIO, 2006.
[42] Secretary-General United Nations Security Council United Nations, The rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies: report of the Secretary-General, 2004.
[43] S. I. Oseguera, Judicial Reform in Mexico: Political Insurance or the Search for Political Legitimacy?, Political Research Quarterly, vol. 62, 2009, p. 754.
[44] S. Robert S., Principles of Rule of Law, Notre Dame Law Review, vo. 74, 1999.
[45] T. R. Tyler, Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and the Effective Rule of Law, Crime and justice, vol. 30, 2003, Pp. 283-357.
[46] The Rule of Law at the National and International Level, 2009, retrieved on June 19, 2015, http://www.un.org/en/ga/sixth/68/RuleOfLaw.shtml.
[47] The UN General Assembly, 2005 World Summit Outcome, The United Nations, ed., 2005.
[48] T. Carothers, Rule-of-law Temptations, Global perspectives on the rule of law Global Perspectives on the Rule of Law / ed. by James J. Heckman, Robert L. Nelson, and Lee Cabatingan, ISBN 0415499550, 2010.
[49] T. R. Tyler, Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: The Benefits of SelfRegulation, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, vol. 7, 2009.
[50] T. R. Tyler, Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and the Effective Rule of Law, Crime and Justice, VOL. 30, p. 323, 2003.
[51] U. N. Secretary-General, The rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies: report of the Secretary-General (UN. 2011), p. 3.
[52] U. N. Secretary-General, The rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies: report of the Secretary-General, 2004, p. 4, 7.
[53] UKaid from the Department for International Development, Pro Poor Intergity Guidelines, The Kenyan Section of the International Commission of Jurists XIII ed. 2011, p. 11-19.
[54] United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and & the Treatment of Offenders, Basic principles on the independence of the judiciary, United Nations, Dept. of Public Information, 1985.
[55] United Nations General Assembly United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights United Nations, United Nations declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples: adopted by the General Assembly on 13 September 2007, OHCHR, 2008, art. 34.
[56] V. Popovski, International rule of law and professional ethics (2014), available at http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope= site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=656741.
[57] Z. Hanhua, Institutt for menneskerettigheter, Objectives of judicial system reform: establishing an independent, open, and dynamic judiciary, Norwegian Institute of Human Rights, 1999.