A Blueprint for an Educational Trajectory: The Power of Discourse in Constructing “Naughty” and “Adorable” Kindergarten Students

Authors: Fernanda T. Orsati, Julie Causton

Abstract:

Discursive practices enacted by educators in kindergarten create a blueprint for how the educational trajectories of students with disabilities are constructed. This two-year ethnographic case study critically examines educators’ relationships with students considered to present challenging behaviors in one kindergarten classroom located in a predominantly White middle class school district in the Northeast of the United States. Focusing on the language and practices used by one special education teacher and three teaching assistants, this paper analyzes how teacher responses to students’ behaviors constructs and positions students over one year of kindergarten education. Using a critical discourse analysis it shows that educators understand students’ behaviors as deficit and needing consequences. This study highlights how educators’ responses reflect students' individual characteristics including family background, socioeconomics and ability status. This paper offers in depth analysis of two students’ stories, which evidenced that the language used by educators amplifies the social positioning of students within the classroom and creates a foundation for who they are constructed to be. Through exploring routine language and practices, this paper demonstrates that educators outlined a blueprint of kindergartners, which positioned students as learners in ways that became the ground for either a limited or a promising educational pathway for them.

Keywords: Behavior, early education, special education, critical discourse analysis.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1108408

References:

[1] National Disability Rights Network. Schools are not Supposed to Hurt: Investigative Report on Abusive Restraint and Seclusion in Schools, 2009, Available at: http://www.ndrn.org/en/media/publications.html.
[2] United States Government Accountability Office. (2009). Seclusions and Restraints: Selected Cases of Death and Abuse at Public and Private Schools and Treatment Centers, 2009, Available at: http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-719T.
[3] S. Danforth, Compliance as Alienated Labor: A Critical Analysis of Public School Programs for Students Considered to Have Emotional/Behavioral Disorders, in Disability Studies in Education: Readings in Theory and Method, S. Gabel (Ed.), New York, NY: Peter Lang, 2009, pp. 85-102.
[4] N. Erevelles, Rewriting Critical Pedagogy from the Periphery: Materiality, Disability and the Politics of Schooling, in Disability Studies in Education: Readings in Theory and Method, S. Gabel (Ed), New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, 2005, (pp. 65-83).
[5] L. Darling-Hammond, Standards, Accountability, and School Reform. In Facing Accountability in Education: Democracy and Equity at Risk, C. Sleeter (Ed.), New York, NY: Teachers College Press, 2007, pp. 78-111.
[6] A. Kohn, Beyond Discipline: from Compliance to Community. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1996.
[7] B. Harry, & J. Klingner, Why are so many Minority Students in Special Education? Understanding Race & Disability in Schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, 2006.
[8] E. R. Meiners, Right to be Hostile: Schools, Prisons, and the Making of Public Enemies. New York, NY: Routledge, 2007.
[9] T. M. Skrtic, Disability and Democracy: Reconstructing (Special Education for Postmodernity). New York, NY: Teachers College Press, 1995.
[10] B. A. Ferri, & D. Connor, Reading Resistance: Discourse of Exclusion in Desegregation & Inclusion Debate. New York, NY: Peter Lang, 2006.
[11] D. J. Gallagher, The Natural Hierarchy Undone: Disability Studies’ Contributions to Contemporary Debates in Education, in (Eds.), Vital Questions Facing Disability Studies in Education, Danforth, S. & Gabel, S. New York, NY: Peter Lang, 2008, pp. 63-75.
[12] S. Taylor, before it had a name, in Vital Questions Facing Disability Studies in Education, S. Danforth, & S. Gabel. New York, NY: Peter Lang, 2008.
[13] L. Ware, Many Possible Futures, Many Different Directions: Merging Critical Special Education and Disability Studies, in Disability Studies in Education: Readings in Theory and Method, S. Gabel (Ed.), New York, NY: Peter Lang, 2009, pp. 103-124.
[14] B. Davies, & R. Harré, Positioning: The Discursive Production Selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, vol 20, no.1, pp. 43-63, 1990.
[15] S. Wortham, from Good Student to Outcast: The Emergence of a Classroom Identity. ETHOS, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 164-187, 2004.
[16] K. M. Collins, Ability Profiling and School Failure: One Child’s Struggle to be Seen as Competent. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 2003.
[17] B. Hatt, Smartness as a Cultural Practice in Schools. American Educational Research Journal, vol. 49, no., 3, pp. 438-460, 2012.
[18] R. C. Bogdan, & S. K. Biklen, S.K. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods. New York, NY: Pearson, 2007.
[19] T. A. Schwandt, the SAGE Dictionary of Qualitative Inquiry (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2007.
[20] L Philips, & M. Jorgensen, Discourse Analysis and Theory and Method. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2002.
[21] N, Fairclough, Language and Power. New York, NY: Pearson Education Limited, 2001.
[22] T. Van Dijk, Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse and Society, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 249-283, 1993.
[23] R. Wodak, & M. Meyer, Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology in Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Washington, DC: SAGE, pp. 1-33, 2009.
[24] J. P. Gee, An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. New York, NY: Routledge, 2011.
[25] J. P. Gee, Discourse Analysis: What Makes it Critical? in An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education, R. Rogers (Ed.), New York, NY: Routledge, 2011, pp. 23-45.
[26] F. T. Orsati, Against the Standards: Analyzing Expectations and Discourse of Educators Regarding Students with Disabilities in a Kindergarten Classroom. Education Research International, 2014, available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/325430.
[27] G. Sugai, Postmodernism and Emotional and Behavioral Disorders: Distraction or Advancement? Behavioral Disorders, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 171-177, 1998.
[28] D. Mitchell, What Really Works in Special and Inclusive Education: Using Evidence-Based Teaching Strategies. New York, NY: Routledge, 2008.
[29] R. Casella, Zero Tolerance Policy in Schools: Rationale, Consequences, and Alternatives. Teachers College Record, vol. 105, pp. 872–892, 2003.
[30] D. Youdell, Impossible Bodies, Impossible Selves: Exclusions and Student Subjectivities. London, UK: Springer, 1996.
[31] S. Gabel, Introduction: Disability Studies in Education, in Disability Studies in Education: Readings in Theory and Method, S. Gabel (Ed.), New York, NY: Peter Lang, 2009, pp. 1-20.
[32] M. Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1977.
[33] G, Kress, Discourse Analysis and Education: A Multimodal Social Semiotic Approach, in an Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education, R. Rogers (Ed.), New York, NY: Routledge, 2011, pp. 205- 226.
[34] S. Rowe, Discourse in Activity and Activity as Discourse. In An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education, R. Rogers (Ed.), New York, NY: Routledge, 2011, pp. 227-241.
[35] A. H. Ferguson, Bad Boys: Public Schools in the Making of Black Masculinity. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press, 2004.
[36] K. E. Wohwend, Mapping Modes in Children’s Played and Design: An Action-Oriented Approach to Critical Multimodal Social Semiotic Approach. In R. Rogers (Ed.), an Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education New York, NY: Routledge, 2011, pp. 242-266.
[37] M. Foucault, Power and Knowledge: Selected Interviews and other Writings 1972-1977. New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1980.
[38] P. Smith, Whatever Happened to Inclusion? The Place of Students with Intellectual Disabilities in Education. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing Inc, 2010.
[39] J-G, Kang, A teacher’s Deconstruction of Disability: A Discourse Analysis. Disability Studies Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 1, 2009. Available at: http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/173/173
[40] B. Harry, J. K. Klingner, K. M. Sturges, & R. F. Moore, of Rocks and Soft Places: Using Qualitative Methods to Investigate Disproportionality, in Racial Inequity in Special Education Cambridge, D. J. Losen & G. Orfield (Eds.), MA: Harvard Education Press, 2002, pp. 71-92.
[41] J. Causton-Theoharis, The Golden Rule of Providing Support in Inclusive Classrooms: Support Others as You would Wish to be Supported. Teaching Exceptional Children, vol., 42, no. 2, pp. 36-43, 2009.
[42] T. J. Smith, S. Danforth, & S. Nice, Creating a Participatory Class Community, in Engaging Troubling Students: A Constructivist Approach, S. Danforth & T.J. Smith. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 2005, pp. 57-91.
[43] H. Lovett, Learning to Listen: Positive Approaches and People with Difficult Behavior. Boston, MA: Paul Brooks Publishing Co, 1996.