Phenols and Manganese Removal from Landfill Leachate and Municipal Wastewater Using the Constructed Wetland

Authors: Amin Mojiri, Lou Ziyang

Abstract:

Constructed Wetland (CW) is a reasonable method to treat wastewater. Current study was carried out to co-treat landfill leachate and domestic wastewater using a CW system. Typha domingensis was transplanted to CW, which encloses two substrate layers of adsorbents named ZELIAC and zeolite. Response surface methodology and central composite design were employed to evaluate experimental data. Contact time (h) and leachate-towastewater mixing ratio (%; v/v) were selected as independent factors. Phenols and manganese removal were selected as dependent responses. At optimum contact time (48.7 h) and leachate-towastewater mixing ratio (20.0%), removal efficiencies of phenols and manganese removal efficiencies were 90.5%, and 89.4%, respectively.

Keywords: Constructed wetland, manganese, phenols, Thypha domingensis.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1108354

References:

[1] S. Q. Aziz, H. A. Aziz, and M. S. Yusoff, Optimum process parameters for the treatment of landfill leachate using powdered activated carbon augmented sequencing batch reactor (SBR) technology,” Sep. Sci. Technol., vol. 46, pp. 1-12, 2011a.
[2] A. A. Foul, H. A. Aziz, M. H. Isa, and Y. T. Hung, “Primary treatment of anaerobic landfill leachate using activated carbon and limestone: batch and column studies,” Inter. J. Environ. Waste Manage. 4, pp. 282- 290, 2009.
[3] A. Mojiri, Co-Treatment of Landfill Leachate and Settled Domestic Wastewater Using Composite Adsorbent in Sequencing Batch Reactor,” PhD Thesis, Univerisiti Sains Malaysia, 2014
[4] I. H. Dakhil, “Removal of Phenol from Industrial Wastewater Using Sawdust. Research Inventy,” International Journal of Engineering And Science, vol. 3 no. 1, pp. 25-31, 2013.
[5] S.Q. Aziz, H. A. Aziz, M. S. Yusoff, and M. J. K. Bashir, “Landfill leachate treatment using powdered activated carbon augmented sequencing batch reactor (SBR) process: optimization by response surface methodology,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 189,pp. 404-413, 2011b.
[6] A. Mojiri, “Phytoremediation of heavy metals from municipal wastewater by Typha domingensis, African Journal of Microbiology Research, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 643-647, 2012.
[7] M. Shehzadi, M. Afzal, M. U. Khan, E. Islam, A. Mobin, S. Anwar, and Q.M. Khan, “Enhanced degradation of textile effluent in constructed wetland system using Typha domingensis and textile effluent-degrading endophytic bacteria,” Water Res., vol. 58, pp. 152-159, 2014.
[8] B. S. Esteves, A. Enrich-Prast, M. S. Suzuki, “Allometric relations for Typha domingensis natural populations,” Acta Limnol. Bras., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 305-311, 2008.
[9] T. O. Khider, S. Omer, and O. Taha, “Alkaline Pulping of Typha domingensis stems from Sudan,” World Applied Sciences Journal, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 331- 336, 2012.
[10] T. Fakin, A. Ristić, A. Horvat and V. Kaučič, “Water Adsorption Study on the Zeolite Lta Granules,” Proceedings of the 5th Serbian-Croatian- Slovenian Symposium on Zeolites, May 30th - June 2nd 2013, Serbia.
[11] APHA, “Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater”, twenty first edition, American Public Health Association, Washington DC, p. 541, 2005.
[12] E. Benfenati, P. Pierucci, R. Fanelli, A. Preiss, M. Godejohann, and M. Astratov, Comparative studies of the leachates of an industrial landfill by gas chromatographyemass spectrometry, liquid chromatographyenuclear magnetic resonance and liquid chromatographyemass spectrometry,” J. Cromatogr., vol. 831, pp. 243- 256, 1999.
[13] G. Varank, A. Demir, K. Yetilmezsoy, M. S. Bilgili, S. Top, and E. Sekman, “Estimation of transport parameters of phenolic compounds and inorganic contaminants through composite landfill liners using onedimensional mass transport model,” Waste Manage., vol. 31, pp. 2263- 2274.
[14] Y. Kurata, Y. Ono, and Y. Ono, “Occurrence of phenols in leachates from municipal solid waste landfill sites in Japan,” J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag., Vol. 10, pp. 144-152.
[15] A. Yalcuk, “Removal of Phenol from Olive Mill Wastewater in Constructed Wetlands Using Different Bedding Media,” Ekoloji, vol. 20, no. 80, pp. 1-5, 2011.
[16] M. D. Bubba, L. Checckini, C. Pifferi, L. Zanieri, and L. Lepri, “Olive mill wastewater treatment by a pilot scale subsurface horizontal flow constructed wetland,” Annali di Chimica, vol. 94, no. 12, pp. 875-887, 2004.
[17] S.R. Taffarel, and S.R. Rubio, “On the removal of Mn2+ ions by adsorption onto natural and activated Chilean zeolites,” Miner. Eng., vol. 22, pp. 336–343, 2009.
[18] E. Wojciechowska, and S. Waara, “Distribution and removal efficiency of heavy metals in two constructed wetlands treating landfill leachate,” Water Sci. Technol., vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 1597-606, 2011.
[19] P. K. Padmavathiamma, and L. Y. Li, “Phytoremediation technology: hyper accumulation metals in plants,” Water Air Soil Pollut., vol. 184, pp. 105-126, 2007.
[20] W. A. Peer, I.R. Baxter, E.L. Richards, J.L. Freeman, and A.S. Murphy, “Phytoremediation and hyperaccumulator plants. The University of Chicago,” The Science behind Genetically Modified Organisms, pp: 43, 2005.
[21] B. V. Tangahu, S. R. S. Abdullah, H. Basri, M. Idris, N. Anuar, M. Mukhlisin M (2011). A Review on HeavyMetals (As, Pb, and Hg) Uptake by Plants through Phytoremediation. International Journal of Chemical Engineering, Article ID 939161, 31 pages, 2011.