Commenced in January 2007
Paper Count: 30067
Factors Underlying the Digital Divide for Disabled People: Focus on a Korean Case Study
Authors: Soungwan Kim
Abstract:This study identifies factors underlying the digital divide that is faced by the disabled. The results of its analysis showed that the digital divide in PC use is affected by age, number of years of education, employment status, and household income of more than KRW 3 million. The digital divide in smart device use is affected by sex, age, number of years of education, time when disability struck, and household income of more than KRW 3 million. Based on these results, this study proposes methods for bridging the digital divide faced by the disabled.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1108160Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF
 OECD. (2001). Understanding the Digital Divide. OECD.
 NTIA. (1999). Falling through the net: defining the digital divide: a report on the telecommunications and information technology gap in America. Washington, D. C.
 Monlar. (2002). Explanation frame of the digital divide Issue. Information Society, 4.
 Selwyn, N. (2002). Defining the digital divide: developing a theoretical understanding of inequalities in the information age. Cardiff university school of social sciences occasional paper.
 Haywood. (1998), Global networks and the myth of equality: trickle down and trickle away?, in Loader, B. D. (ed). Cyberspace Divide: Equality, Agency and Policy in the Information Society, London & New York: Routledge.
 Kim, M. & Kim, J. (2002). Theoretical and policy-related discussions on the digital divide. Korean Journal of Sociology, 36(4).
 National Computerization Agency (2001). Study into information technology accessibility guidelines for information access for the disabled.
 Na, W. (2002). The digital divide and information communication access for the disabled. 10 years of Asia-Pacific Disabled Persons (1993- 2002) Research Paper Compilation. Korean Society for Rehabilitation of Persons with Disabilities.
 Jo, J. (2003). The information accessibility for the disabled: Focusing on the type and intensity of disability. Korea Journal of Population Studies, 26(2): 147-173.
 Katz, J. & Aspden, P. (1997). Motivations for and Barriers to Internet Usage: Results of a National Public Opinion Survey, In Interconnection and the Internet, Gregory L. Rosston and David Wasterman (ed.), Lawrence Erlaum Association Publishers, Mahwah: New Jersey, pp79- 84.
 Moss, J. (2002). Power and the digital divide. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(2), 159-165.
 Choi, M. & Yoon, Y. (1998). The gender divide in information ability: A social issue? Journal of Cyber communication, 2: 68-98.
 Kim, Y. (2000). Female information orientation and policy assignment: Focusing on the female information orientation policy of the Ministry of Information and Communication. Journal of Women’s Studies, 10(1): 57-69.
 Hudson, H. E. (2000). Accesse to the Digital Economy: Issues in Rural age Developing Regions.
 Waddell, C. D. (1999). The growing Digital Divide In Access for People with disabilities: Overcoming Barriers to Participation.
 Baek, S. (2003). A study into factors that influence information inequality. Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies, 22: 81-107.
 Lee, J. & Kim, Y. (2011). A study into the influence of socioeconomic characteristic of the auditory disabled on the occurrence of digital divide: Focusing on the mediation effect of language skills. Korean Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 15(4): 159-182.
 Song, H. (2006). Study into factors influencing the reception of welfare information services to decrease digital divide for the disabled. Ph.D. graduate thesis for University of Seoul.
 Kang, D (2002). A comprehensive analysis of the digital divide factors for disabled persons with employment. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation. 12(2): 23-42.
 Kim, S. (2008). The influence of information access by the deaf and dumb persons on their self-reliance. Master’s degree thesis, Kyungnam University.
 Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions. Journal of Marketing, 6, 50-58.