Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33093
Intellectual Capital and Transparency in Universities: An Empirical Study
Authors: Yolanda Ramírez, Ángel Tejada, Agustín Baidez
Abstract:
This paper shows the general perceptions of Spanish university stakeholders in relation to the university’s annual reports and the adequacy and potential of intellectual capital reporting. To this end, a questionnaire was designed and sent to every member of the Social Councils of Spanish public universities. It was thought that these participants would provide a good example of the attitude of university stakeholders since they represent the different social groups connected with universities. From the results of this study we are in the position of confirming the need for universities to offer information on intellectual capital in their accounting information model.Keywords: Intellectual capital, disclosure, stakeholders, universities, annual report.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1107988
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2016References:
[1] Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), GASB 35: Basic Financial Statements –and Management’s Discussion and Analysis- for Public Colleges and Universities. Governmental Accounting Standards Board, 1999.
[2] Council of University Coordination, Documento sobre Financiación de las Universidades. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, 2010.
[3] E. Martín, and J.M. Moneva, Análisis de la Rendición de Cuentas de las Universidades Desde un Enfoque de Responsabilidad social. Workshop sobre Responsabilidad social, Gobierno Corporativo y Transparencia Informativa, Granada (Spain), 2009.
[4] M. Melle, “La Responsabilidad Social Dentro del Sector Público”, Ekonomiaz, vol. 65, pp. 84-107, 2007.
[5] Y. Ramírez, “The Intellectual Capital Models in Spanish Public Sector”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, vol. 11, pp. 248-264, 2010a.
[6] E. Martín, “La Rendición de Cuentas en Las Universidades Públicas Españolas: Un Análisis de la Información Revelada en Los Estados Financieros”, Presupuesto y Gasto Público, vol. 43, pp. 39-62, 2006.
[7] R.H. Gray, “Social, Environmental and Sustainability Reporting and Organizational Value Creation? Whose Value? Whose Creation?”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, vol. 19, pp. 793-819, 2006.
[8] D. Coy, G. Tower, and K. Dixon, “Public accountability: A new paradigm for college and university annual reports”, Critical Perspective on Accounting, vol. 12, pp. 1-31, 2001.
[9] European Commision, Ricardis, Reporting Intellectual Capital to Augment Research, Development and Innovation in SMEs. Brussels: EC, 2006.
[10] K. H. Leitner, “Intellectual Capital Reporting for Universities: Conceptual Background and Application for Austrian Universities”, Research Evaluation, Vol. 13, pp. 129-140, 2004.
[11] S. Elena, Governing the University of the 21st Century: Intellectual Capital as a Tool for Strategic Management. Lessons from the European Experience. PhD research, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain), 2007.
[12] Y. Ramírez, C. Lorduy, and J. A. Rojas, “Intellectual Capital Management in Spanish Universities”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, vol. 8, pp. 732-748, 2007.
[13] L. Cañibano, and P. Sánchez, “Intellectual Capital Management and Reporting in Universities and Research Institutions”, Estudios de Economía Aplicada, Vol. 26, pp. 7-26, 2008.
[14] P. Sánchez, S. Elena, and R. Castrillo, “Intellectual Capital Dynamics in Universities: A Reporting Model”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 10, pp. 307-324, 2009.
[15] I. Bezhani, “Intellectual Capital Reporting at UK Universities”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 11, pp. 179-207, 2010.
[16] V. Bodnár, T. Harangozó, T. Tirnitz, E. Révész, and G. Kováts, Managing Intellectual Capital in Hungarian Universities – The Case of Corvinus University of Budapest, 2nd European Conference on Intellectual Capital. ISCTE, 29-30 March, Lisbon (Portugal), 2010.
[17] C. Casanueva, and A. Gallego, “Social Capital and Individual Innovativeness in University Research Networks”, Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, Vol. 12, pp. 105-117, 2010.
[18] G. Secundo, A. Margheritam, G. Elia, and G. Passiante, “Intangible Assets in Higher Education and Research: Mission, Performance or Both?”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 11, pp. 140-157, 2010.
[19] C. Warden, “Managing and Reporting Intellectual Capital: New Strategic Challenges for HEROs”, IP Helpdesk Bulletin, Vol. 8, 2003.
[20] P. Sánchez, and S. Elena, “Intellectual Capital in Universities. Improving Transparency and Internal Management”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 7, pp.529-548, 2006.
[21] B. González, “Necesidades de Información Financiera de Los Sujetos Implicados en el Desarrollo de la Universidad”, Cuadernos de Estudios Empresariales, Vol. 13, pp. 401-412, 2003.
[22] L. Cañibano, A. Gisbert, E. García-Meca, and B. García-Osma, Los Intangibles en la Regulación Contable. Madrid: Documento AECA & Instituto Análisis Intangibles, 2008.
[23] Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), Disclosures about Intangible Assets, 2004.
[24] International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), Discussion Paper - Management Commentary. London, 2005.
[25] Y. Ramírez, “¿Es Posible un Reconocimiento Contable de los Intangibles?”, Revista de Contabilidad y Tributación, Vol. 328, pp. 125- 146, 2010b.
[26] Instituto de Contabilidad y Auditoría de Cuentas (ICAC), Informe Sobre la Situación Actual de la Contabilidad en España y Líneas Básicas Para Abordar su Reforma (Libro Blanco Para la Reforma de la Contabilidad en España), Madrid: ICAC, 2002.
[27] L. Cañibano, P. Sánchez, M. García-Ayuso, and C. Chaminade, (Eds) Directrices para la Gestión y Difusión de Información sobre Intangibles. Informe de Capital Intelectual. Madrid: Vodafone Fundación, 2002.
[28] K. Dixon, and D. Coy, “University Governance: Governing Bodies as Providers and Users of Annual Reports”, Higher Education, vol. 54, pp. 267-291, 2007.