Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 31532
Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth: The Case of Mexico

Authors: Mario Gómez, José Carlos Rodríguez

Abstract:

The causality between energy consumption and economic growth has been an important issue in the economic literature. This paper studies the causal relationship between electricity consumption and economic growth in Mexico for the period of 1971-2011. In so doing, unit root and causality tests are applied. The results show that energy consumption and economic growth series are stationary and there is also a causality relationship running from economic growth to electricity consumption. Therefore, any energy conservation policy would have little or no impact at all on economic growth in México.

Keywords: Causality, economic growth, electricity consumption, Mexico.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1107974

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2404

References:


[1] I. Ozturk, “A literature survey on energy-growth nexus”, Energy Economics, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 340-49, 2010.
[2] L. Dagher and T. Yacoubian, “The causal relationship between energy consumption and economic growth in Lebanon”, Energy Policy, vol. 50, pp. 795-801, 2012.
[3] H.P. Chu and T. Chang, “Nuclear energy consumption, oil consumption and economic growth in G-6 countries: Bootstrap panel causality test”, Energy Policy, vol. 48, pp. 762-769, 2012.
[4] J. Payne, “A survey of the electricity consumption-growth literature”, Applied Energy, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 723-731, 2010.
[5] J.C. Eggoh, Ch. Bangake and Ch. Rault 2011, “Energy consumption and economic growth revisited in African countries”, Energy Policy, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 7408-7421, 2011.
[6] J. Squalli, “Electricity consumption and economic growth: Bounds and causality analyses of OPEC members”, Energy Economics, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1192-1205, 2007.
[7] A. Ciarreta and A. Zarraga, “Economic growth-electricity consumption causality in 12 European countries: A dynamic panel data approach”, Energy Policy, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 3790-376, 2010.
[8] G. S. Maddala and I-M. Kim, Unit Root, Cointegration and Structural Change. UK, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
[9] O.J. Ebohon, “Energy, economic growth and causality in developing countries”, Energy Policy, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 457-453, 1996.
[10] U. Soytas and R. Sari, “Energy consumption and GDO: causality relationship in G-7countries and emerging markets”, Energy Economics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 33-37, 2003.
[11] W. Oh and K. Lee, “Causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP revisited: the case of Korea 1970-1999”, Energy Economics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 51-59, 2004.
[12] Y. Wolde-Rufael (2005), “Energy demand and economic growth: The African experience”, Journal of Policy Modeling, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 891- 903, 2005.
[13] C.C. Lee and C.P. Chang, “Energy consumption and economic growth in Asian economies: A more comprehensive analysis using panel data”, Resource and Energy Economics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 50-65, 2008.
[14] H.H. Lean and R. Smyth, “Multivariate Granger causality between electricity generation, exports, prices and GDP in Malaysia”, Energy, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 3640-3648, 2010.
[15] S. Tsani, “Energy consumption and economic growth: A causality analysis for Greece”, Energy Economics, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 582-590, 2010.
[16] H.P. Chu and T. Chang (2012), “Nuclear energy consumption, oil consumption and economic growth in G-6 countries: Bootstrap panel causality test”, Energy Policy, vol. 48, pp. 762-769, 2012.
[17] L. Ozturk. and A. Acaravci, “The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial decolopment on carbon emissions in Turkey”, Energy Economics, vol. 36, pp. 262-267, 2013.
[18] W.N. Cowan, T. Chang, R. Inglesa-Lotz and R. Gupta, “The nexus of electricity consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in the BRICS countries”, Energy Policy, vol. 66, pp. 359-368, 2014.
[19] G. Altinay and E. Karagol, “Structural breaks, unit root, and the causality between energy consumption and GDP in Turkey”, Energy Economics, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 985-994, 2004.
[20] G. Altinay and E. Karagol, “Electricity consumption and economic growth: Evidence from Turkey”, Energy Economics, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 849-856, 2005.
[21] C.C. Lee and C.P. Chang, “Energy consumption and GDP revisited: A panel analysis of developed and developing countries”, Energy Economics, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1206-1223, 2007.
[22] P.K. Narayan and R. Smyth, “Energy consumption and real DP in G7 countries: New evidence from panel cointegration with structural breaks”, Energy Economics, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 2331-2341, 2009.
[23] C.F. Tang, M. Shahbaz and M. Arouri, “Re-investigating the electricity consumption and economic growth nexus in Portugal”, Energy Policy, vol. 62, pp. 1515-1521, 2013.
[24] M. Shahbaz, S. Khan and M. I. Tahir, “The dynamic links between energy consumption, economic growth, financial development and trade China: Fresh evidence from multivariate framework analysis”, Energy Economics, vol. 40, pp. 8-21, 2013.
[25] L.M. Galindo and L. Sánchez, “El consumo de energía y la economía Mexicana: un análisis empírico con VAR”, Economía Mexicana NUEVA ÉPOCA, vol 18, no, 1, pp. 271-298, 2005.
[26] B.S. Cheng, “Energy consumption and economic growth in Brasil, Mexico and Venezuela: a time series analysis”, Applied Economic Letters, vol. 4, pp. 671-674, 1997.
[27] J. Lee and M. Strazicich, “Minimum lagrange multiplier unit root test with two structural breaks”, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 1082-1089, 2003.
[28] D.G. Fernandez, “Breaking trends and the money-output correlation”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 674-79, 1997.
[29] M.Q. Islam, “Structural break, unit root, and the causality between government expenditures and revenues” Applied Economics Letters, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 565-567, 2001.
[30] E. Zivot and D. Andrews, “Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 251-270, 1992.
[31] P. Perron, “Further evidence on breaking trend functions in macroeconomic variables”, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 355-385, 1997.
[32] R. Lumsdaine and D. Papell, “Multiple trend breaks and the unit root hypothesis”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 212-218, 1997.
[33] J. Lee and M. Strazicich, “Break point estimation and spurious rejections with endogenous unit root tests”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 535-558, 2001.
[34] C.W. Granger, “Investigating causal relations by econometrics models and cross spectral methods”, Econometrica, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 424-438, 1969.
[35] C.A. Sims, “Money, income and causality”, American Economic Review, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 540-552, 1972.
[36] J. Geweke, R. Meese and W. Dent (1982), “Comparing alternatives tests of causality in temporal systems”, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 21, pp. 161-194, 1982.
[37] H.Y. Toda and T. Yamamoto, “Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes”, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 66, pp. 225-250, 1995.
[38] World Bank, http://www.worldbank.org/ Retrieved on July 27, 2014.
[39] International Financial Statistics of the International Monetary Fund http://elibrary-data.imf.org/. Retrieved on July 27, 2014.