Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30685
Gypsum Composites with CDW as Raw Material

Authors: R. Santos Jiménez, A. San-Antonio-González, M. Del Río Merino, M. González Cortina, C. Viñas Arrebola


In this study, the feasibility of incorporating ceramic waste from bricks (perforated brick and double hollow brick) and extruded polystyrene (XPS) waste, is analysed. Results show that it is possible to incorporate up to 25% of ceramic waste and 4% of XPS waste over the weight of gypsum in a gypsum matrix. Furthermore, with the addition of ceramic waste an 8% of surface hardness increase and a 25% of capillary water absorption reduction can be obtained. On the other hand, with the addition of XPS, a 26% reduction of density and a 37% improvement of thermal conductivity can be obtained. The obtained results are favorable to use these materials in order to produce prefabricated gypsum and also as material for interior cladding walls.

Keywords: Construction Materials, Waste Materials, gypsum, Ceramic Waste, XPS, CDW

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1579


[1] Almut R, et al. EU as a Recycling Society, Present recycling levels of Municipal Waste and Construction & Demolition Waste in the EU. European Topic Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production. Denmark, 2008.
[2] European Parliament. Directive 2009/28/EC, promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. European Union, 2009.
[3] Spanish Government. National Plan for Construction and Demolition Waste 2001-2006. BOE, July 2001, n. 166, p. 25305.
[4] Spanish Government. Real Decree 105/2008, on the production and management of construction and demolition waste. BOE, February 2008, n. 38, p. 7724.
[5] Spanish Government. Instruction for Structural Concrete (EHE 2008). Madrid, 2008.
[6] CEDEX. Catalogue of usable waste in construction. Madrid, 2001.
[7] Australian Government. Construction and demolition waste guide recycling and re-use across the supply chain. Australia, 2012.
[8] NYC Department of Design & Construction. “Construction & Demolition Waste Manual” New York, 2003.
[9] Klock, W; Aicher, S. Size effect in paper fiber-reinforced gypsum panels under in-plane bending. Wood and Fiber Science, 2005.
[10] Fujita, T; Komatsu, N; Kawai, SA. Manufacture and properties of gypsum-bonded particleboard IV. Properties of gypsum-bonded particleboard made with raw material from waste gypsum boards. Mokuzai gakkaishi; 2006:52(6):368-375.
[11] Jiménez Rivero, A; de Guzmán Báez, A; García Navarro, J. New composite gypsum – ground waste rubber coming from pipe foam insulation. Construction and Building Materials; 2014:55:146-152.
[12] Leiva Aguilera, MJ; Del Río Merino M “Additived gypsum with rice husk waste”. I International and III National Congress on Sustainable Construction and Ecoefficient Solutions. Universidad de Sevilla, 20-22 May 2013.
[13] García Hilario, A. Incorporation of loofah in plaster. Master's Degree Final Project, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 2011.
[14] Arvelo Reynoso, ED. Use of feathers to improve toughness in mortars. Master's Degree Final Project, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 2011.
[15] García Figuereo, JA. The addition of shell mussels in plaster, lime and cement composites. Master's Degree Final Project, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 2011.
[16] Marte Rosario, M. Use of Chandler nutshell in plaster composites. Master's Degree Final Project, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 2011.
[17] San-Antonio-González, A; Santos Jiménez, R; Del Río Merino, M; González Cortina, M; Viñas Arrebola, C. “Feasibility of Recycling CDW as Raw Material in Gypsum Composites”. 4th Annual International Conference on Architecture. Athens, 7-10 July 2014.
[18] González Cortina, M; Villanueva domínguez, L. “Recovery of roman mortars made with lime and ceramic waste in current applications”. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 2000.
[19] Puertas, F; Barba, A; Gazulla, MF; Gómez, MP; Palacio, M; Martínez- Ramírez, S. “Ceramic wastes as raw materials in portland cement clinker fabrication: Characterization and alcaline activation”. Materiales de Construcción; 2006:56(281):73-84.
[20] Chiara Bignozzi, M; Saccani, A. “Ceramic waste as aggregate and supplementary cementing material: A combined action to contrast alkali silica reaction (ASR)”. Cement & Concrete Composites; 2011:34:1141- 1148.
[21] Medina, C, et al. Characterization of concrete made with recycled aggregate from ceramic sanitary ware. Materiales de Construcción; 2011:61(304):533-546.
[22] Sánchez de Rojas, MI, et al. Viability of utilization of waste materials from ceramic products in precast concretes. Materiales de Construcción, 2001:51:263-264.
[23] Gutierrez-Gonzalez, S; Gadea, J; Rodriguez, A; Junco, C; Calderon, V. Lightweight gypsum materials with enhanced thermal properties made with polyurethane foam wastes. Construction and Building Materials; 2012.
[24] Abdulkadir, K., & Ramazan, D. A novel material for lightweight concrete production. Cement Concrete Comp; 2009:31:489–495.
[25] González Madariaga, FJ. Mixtures of waste expanded polystyrene (EPS) with gypsum or gypsum plaster for use in construction. Informes de la Construcción; 2008:60:35- 43.
[26] AENOR. EN 13279-1, Gypsum binders and gypsum plasters – Part 1: Definitions and requirements. Madrid, 2009.
[27] AENOR. EN 13279-2, Gypsum binders and gypsum plasters - Part 2: Test methods. Madrid, 2014.
[28] AENOR. UNE 102039, Gypsum binders and gypsum plasters. Shore C and Brinell hardness determination. Madrid, 1985.
[29] AENOR. UNE EN 459-2:2001, Determination of water retention. Madrid, 2001.
[30] AENOR. RP 35.00, Supplementary Regulations AENOR for gypsum binders and gypsum plasters, precast and other related products. Common requirements. Madrid, 2009