Evaluation of Minimization of Moment Ratio Method by Physical Modeling
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Evaluation of Minimization of Moment Ratio Method by Physical Modeling

Authors: Amin Eslami, Jafar Bolouri Bazaz

Abstract:

Under active stress conditions, a rigid cantilever retaining wall tends to rotate about a pivot point located within the embedded depth of the wall. For purely granular and cohesive soils, a methodology was previously reported called minimization of moment ratio to determine the location of the pivot point of rotation. The usage of this new methodology is to estimate the rotational stability safety factor. Moreover, the degree of improvement required in a backfill to get a desired safety factor can be estimated by the concept of the shear strength demand. In this article, the accuracy of this method for another type of cantilever walls called Contiguous Bored Pile (CBP) retaining wall is evaluated by using physical modeling technique. Based on observations, the results of moment ratio minimization method are in good agreement with the results of the carried out physical modeling.

Keywords: Cantilever Retaining Wall, Physical Modeling, Minimization of Moment Ratio Method, Pivot Point.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1107333

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1586

References:


[1] Madabhushi, S.P.G. and Chandrasekaran, V.S. (2005) “Rotation of Cantilever Sheet Pile Walls” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 131, 202-212.
[2] Wen, R. (1955). “Model Studies of Laterally Loaded Pile Foundations,” Proc. 34th Annual Meeting, Highway Research Board, pp. 140-152.
[3] Matlock, H. and Ripperger, E. (1957). “Theoretical Analysis and Laboratory Studies of Laterally Loaded Model Pile Segments,” Rpt. To Shell Oil Co., Engineering Science Consultants, July.
[4] Prakash, S. (1962). “Behavior of Pile Groups Subjected to Lateral Loads,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. of Illinois.
[5] Davisson, M. and Salley, J. (1970). “Model Study of Laterally Loaded Piles,” J. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Div., ASCE, 96(5), 1605- 1627.
[6] Park, R. (1987), “Seismic Performance of Steel-Encased Concrete Piles,” Rpt. 87/5, Dept. of Civil Eng., University of Canterbury.
[7] N. Kumar, A. Dey,(2013), Rotational Stability of Rigid Cantilever Sheet Pile Walls ,North East Students Geo-Congress on Advances in Geotechnical Engineering (NES Geo-Congress 2013), Guwahati
[8] Padfield, C. J., and Mair, R. J. (1984). Design of retaining walls embedded in stiff clays. CIRIA Report 104, London, Constr. Industry Res. and Information Assoc. (CIRIA), London, England.