Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Internal and External Validity in Experimental Economics
Authors: H. Chytilová, R. Maialeh
Abstract:
Experimental economics is subject to criticism with regards to frequently discussed the trade-off between internal and external validity requirements, which seems to be critically flawed. This paper evaluates incompatibility of trade-off condition and condition of internal validity as a prerequisite for external validity. In addition, it outlines the imprecise concept of artificiality, which is found to be rather improving the external validity and seems to strengthen the illusory status of external versus internal validity tension. Internal validity is further analyzed with regards to Duhem- Quine problem, where unpredictability argument is significantly weakened trough application of inductivism within the illustrative hypothetical-deductive model. Our discussion partially weakens critical arguments related to the robustness of results in experimental economics, if the perfectly controlled experimental environment is secured.Keywords: Duhem-Quine Problem, external validity, inductivism, internal validity.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1107311
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 3038References:
[1] K.Binmore, Playing Fair. MIT Press,1994.
[2] K. Binmore, A. Shaked, “Experimental Economics: Where Next?”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2010, 73 (1), 87-100.
[3] D.S.Brookshire, L. Coursey,D.W. Schulze, “The External Validity of Experimental Economics Techniques: Analysis of Demand Behaviour,”Economic Inquiry, 1987, 25 (2), 239-250.
[4] D.T. Campbell,“Factors Relevant to the Validity of Experiments in Social Settings, “Psychological Bulletin, 1957, 54(4), 297-312.
[5] N. Cartwright, “Hunting Causes and Using Them,” Cambridge:University of Cambridge Press, 2007.
[6] T.D. Cook, D.T. Campbell, “Quasi-experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings,” Boston, Houghton Mifflin Co., 1979.
[7] J. Cross, Some Comments on the Papers by KagelabdBattalio and by Smith. In Kmenta, J. And Ramsey, J., eds., “Evaluation of Econometric Models,” New York University Press, 1980.
[8] D. Davis, C. Holt,“Experimental Economics,” Princeton University Press, ISBN: 9780691043173, 1993.
[9] E. Fehr, A. Falk, “Why Labour Market Experiments?”Labour Economics, 2003,10 (4), 399-406.
[10] M. Friedman,“The Methodology of Positive Economics.” in Essays in Positive Economics, edited by Milton Friedman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.
[11] D. Friedman, D. S. Sunder,“Experimental Methods. A Primer for Economists,” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521- 45682-7, 1994.
[12] F. Guala,“The Methodology of Experimental Economics,” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-85340-0, 2005.
[13] F. Heukelom,“Origin and Interpretation of Internal and External Validity in Economics,” Nijmegen Centre for Economics, NiCE Working Paper 09-111, 2009.
[14] R.B. Hogarth,“The Challenge of Representativeness Design in Psychology and Economics,”Journal of Economic Methodology, 2005, 12 (2),253-263.
[15] J. Kessler, L. Vesterlund,“External Validity of Laboratory Experiments,“ In preparation for The Methods of Modern Experimental Economics, editors Guillaume Frechette and Andrew Schotter, Oxford University Press, 2010.
[16] R. Lipsey,“An Introduction to Positive Economics,” 5th ed., London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, ISBN 0297775979, 1979.
[17] J.W. Lucas,“Theory-Testing, Generalization, and the Problem of External Validity,” Sociological Theory, 2003, 21(3), 236-253.
[18] C. Plott, “Will Economics Become an Experimental Science,” Southern Economic Journal, 1991, 57 (4), 901-19.
[19] C.R.Plott, “Industrial Organization Theory and Experimental Economics,” Journal of Economic Literature, 1982, 20 (4), 1485-1527.
[20] K.R. Popper, “Conjectures and Refutations,” London: Routledge, 1963.
[21] P.A.Samuelson, W.D. Nordhaus,“Principles of Economics,” 12th ed. 1985.
[22] V.L.Smith,“Experimental Economics: Reply.”American Economic Review, 1985, 75 (1), 265-272.
[23] V.L. Smith,“Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science,”American Economic Review, 1982, 72 (5), pp. 923-955.
[24] Ch.Starmer, “Experiments in Economics: Should we trust the dismal scientists?” Journal of Economic Methodology, 1999, 6 (1), 1-30.
[25] W. Wallis, M. Friedman,“The Empirical Derivation of Indifference Functions,” In: Studie in Mathematical Economics and Econometrics in Memory of Henry Schults, O. Lange, F. McIntyre, T. Yntema (eds), Chicago Press, 1942.