Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32718
Creation of a Care Robot Impact Assessment

Authors: E. Fosch-Villaronga


This paper pioneers Care Robot Impact Assessment (CRIA), a methodology used to identify, analyze, mitigate and eliminate the risks posed by the insertion of non-medical personal care robots (PCR) in medical care facilities. Its precedent instruments [Privacy and Surveillance Impact Assessment (PIA and SIA)] fall behind in coping with robots. Indeed, personal care robots change dramatically how care is delivered. The paper presents a specific risk-sector methodology, identifies which robots are under its scope and presents some of the challenges introduced by these robots.

Keywords: Ethics, Impact Assessment, Law, Personal Care Robots.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2975


[1] K. Rommetveit, “Impact Assessments: Quality Issues in the Policy Making Process,” unpublished.
[2] J. B. Wiener, “The Regulation of Technology, and the Technology of Regulation,” Technology in Society vol. 26, 2004, pp. 483-500.
[3] M. A. Heldeweg and E. Kica, Regulating Technology Innovation. A Multidisciplinary Approach, Palgrave MacMillan, 2011.
[4] R. Brownsword and K. Yeung, Regulating Technologies: Legal Futures, Regulatory Frames and Technological Fixes, Hart Publishing, 2008.
[5] J. P., Holdren, C. R. Sunstein, I. A. Siddiqui, “Principles for Regulation and Oversight of Emerging Technologies”, White House Government Communication, 2011.
[6] L. Lessig, Code version 2.0. Basic Books, NY, 2006.
[7] EC Research, “Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously,” Report, Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy, and Society Directorate of the Directorate-General for Research, 2007.
[8] AGV were introduced to Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA) in Spain. The also called manolitos carry food and medicines from the kitchen or pharmacy to the rooms. Vid.:,- ropa-y-medicinas-en-el-HUCA_111402140212.html.
[9] Anonymous, “You, Robot?” The Economist, September 2012.
[10] E. Palmerini, “The interplay between law and technology, or the RoboLaw project in context,” in Law and Technology. The Challenge of Regulating Technological Development, E. Palmerini and E. Stradella Ed. Pisa: Pisa University Press, 2013, pp. 7-26.
[11] J. B. Wiener, “Global Environmental Regulation: Instrument Choice in Legal Context,” Yale Law Journal, Vol. 108, 1999, pp. 677-800.
[12] M. O. Vrielink, C. Montfort, M. Bokhorst, “Codes as Hybrid Regulation,” in Handbook on the Politics of Regulation, D. Levi-Faur, Ed. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011, pp. 978-1005.
[13] European Commission SEC (2009) 92 Impact Assessment Guidelines, 2009.
[14] D. Wright and K. Wadhwa, “Introducing a Privacy Impact Assessment Policy in the EU Member States,” International Data Privacy Law, Vol. 3. Num. 1, 2013, pp. 13-28.
[15] HIQA, “Health Technology Assessment for Robot-Assisted Surgery in Selected Surgery Procedures,” Health Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, 2012.
[16] Information and Privacy Commissioner, “Privacy Risk Management: Building a Privacy Protection into a Risk Management Framework to Ensure that Privacy Risks Are Managed, by Default,” Ontario, Canada, 2010.
[17] ISO 31000:2009, Risk Management – Principles and Guidelines.
[18] SGTF “Regulatory Recommendations for Privacy, Data Protection and Cyber-Security in the Smart Grid Environment. Data Protection Impact Assessment Template for Smart Grid and Smart Metering Systems,” Smart Grid Task Force 2012-14, Expert Group 2, 2014.
[19] D. Wright and C. D. Raab, “Constructing a Surveillance Impact Assessment,” Computer Law and Security Review vol. 28, 2012, pp. 613-626.
[20] CNIL, “Methodology for Privacy Risk Management. How to Implement the Data Protection Act,” Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés, CNIL, 2012.
[21] NIST, “Cloud Computing: A Review of Features, Benefits, and Risks, and Recommendations for Secure, Efficient Implementations,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST, 2012.
[22] D.Y.Y. Sim and C.K. Loo, “Extensive Assessment and Evaluation Methodologies on Assistive Social Robots for Modeling Human-Robot- Interaction – A Review,” Information Science vol. 301, 2015, pp. 305- 344.
[23] ISO 8373:2012 “Robots and Robotic Devices Vocabulary”, 2.10.
[24] ISO 13482:2014 “Robots and Robotics Devices – Safety Requirements for Personal Care Robots”, 3.13.
[25] COSO, “Internal Control – Integrated Framework, Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission”, 2011.
[26] ISO/IEC 27005:2008/:2011 Information Technology – Security Techniques – Information Security Risk Management.
[27] ISO/IEC 27001:2005 Information Technology. Security Techniques. Information Security Management System Implementation Guidance.
[28] 00678/13/EN, WP205, Opinion 04/2013 on the Data Protection Impact Assessment Template for Smart Grid and Smart Metering Systems (‘DPIA Template’) prepared by Expert Group 2 of the Commission’s Smart Grid Task Force, Article 29 Working Party, 2013.
[29] EC Recommendation 2012/148/EU on the preparation for the roll out of smart metering systems.
[30] Expert Group on the State of the Art in Responsible Research and Innovation in Europe, “Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation,” Report, Brussels, 2013, p. 13.
[31] ISO 27005:2011, “Information Technology – Security Techniques – Information Security Risk Management”.
[32] O. Blanke, et al. “Neurological and Robot-Controlled Induction of an Apparition,” Current Biology, vol. 24 Issue 22, 2014, pp. 2681-2686.