Optimization of a Four-Lobed Swirl Pipe for Clean-In-Place Procedures

Authors: Guozhen Li, Philip Hall, Nick Miles, Tao Wu

Abstract:

This paper presents a numerical investigation of two horizontally mounted four-lobed swirl pipes in terms of swirl induction effectiveness into flows passing through them. The swirl flows induced by the two swirl pipes have the potential to improve the efficiency of Clean-In-Place procedures in a closed processing system by local intensification of hydrodynamic impact on the internal pipe surface. Pressure losses, swirl development within the two swirl pipe, swirl induction effectiveness, swirl decay and wall shear stress variation downstream of two swirl pipes are analyzed and compared. It was found that a shorter length of swirl inducing pipe used in joint with transition pipes is more effective in swirl induction than when a longer one is used, in that it has a less constraint to the induced swirl and results in slightly higher swirl intensity just downstream of it with the expense of a smaller pressure loss. The wall shear stress downstream of the shorter swirl pipe is also slightly larger than that downstream of the longer swirl pipe due to the slightly higher swirl intensity induced by the shorter swirl pipe. The advantage of the shorter swirl pipe in terms of swirl induction is more significant in flows with a larger Reynolds Number.

Keywords: Swirl pipe, swirl effectiveness, CFD, wall shear stress, swirl intensity.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1106911

References:

[1] Leliévre, C., et al., Cleaning in place: effect of local wall shear stress variation on bacterial removal from stainless steel equipment. Chemical Engineering Science, 2002. 57: p. 1287-1297.
[2] Jensen, B. B. B., et al., Local Wall Shear Stress Variations Predicted by Computational Fluid Dynamics for Hygienic Design. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 2005. 83(1): p. 53-60.
[3] Gillham, C. R., et al., Cleaning-in-Place of Whey Protein Fouling Deposits. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 1999. 77(2): p. 127-136.
[4] Dev, S. R. S., et al., Optimization and modeling of an electrolyzed oxidizing water based Clean-In-Place technique for farm milking systems using a pilot-scale milking system. Journal of Food Engineering, 2014. 135(0): p. 1-10.
[5] Pathogen Combat, E.I.P., Factors affecting fouling and cleanability of closed food contact surface. 2011.
[6] Lelieveld, H. L. M., Mostert, M.A., Holah, J. and White, B., Hygiene in Food Processing. Vol. 1st edn. 2003, Woodhead, Cambridge, UK.
[7] Changani, S. D., M. T. Belmar-Beiny, and P. J. Fryer, Engineering and chemical factors associated with fouling and cleaning in milk processing. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 1997. 14: p. 392- 406.
[8] Sharma, M. M., et al., Factors Controlling the Hydrodynamic Detachment of Particles from Surfaces. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 1991. 149: p. 121-134.
[9] Hwang, Y. K. and N. S. Woo, Wall Shear Stress in the Helical Annular Flow with Rotating Inner Cylinder. Diffusion and Defect Data Part B Solid State Phenomena, 2007. 120: p. 261-266.
[10] Li, G., et al., Improving the efficiency of ‘Clean-In-Place’ procedures using a four-lobed swirl pipe: A numerical investigation. Computers & Fluids, 2015. 108(0): p. 116-128.
[11] Najafi, A. F., S. M. Mousavian, and K. Amini, Numerical investigations on swirl intensity decay rate for turbulent swirling flow in a fixed pipe. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2011. 53(10): p. 801-811.
[12] Ganeshalingam, J., Swirl Induction for Improved Solid-Liquid Flow in Pipes. 2002, University of Nottingham.
[13] Ariyaratne, C., Design and Optimisation of Swirl Pipes and Transition Geometries for Slurry Transport, in School of Chemical, Environmental and Mining Engineering. 2005, University of Nottingham.
[14] Kitoh, O., Experimental study of turbulent swirling flow in a straight pipe. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1991. 225: p. 445-479.
[15] Steenbergen, W. and J. Voskamp, The rate of decay of swirl in turbulent pipe flow. Flow measurement and instrumentation, 1998. 9: p. 67-78.
[16] ANSYS, I., ANSYS Fluent 14.0 User's Guide. 2011: Southpointe, Canonsburg, PA, USA.
[17] Bakker, A., Boundary Layers and separation, in Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics. 2002.
[18] Fokeer, S., I.S. Lowndes, and D.M. Hargreaves, Numerical modelling of swirl flow induced by a three-lobed helical pipe. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 2010. 49(5): p. 536-546.
[19] ANSYS, I., ANSYS Fluent 14.0 Theory Guide. 2011: Southpointe, Canonsburg, PA, USA.
[20] Speziale, C.G., S. Sarkar, and T. B. Gatski, Modelling the Pressure- Strain Correlation of Turbulence: An Invariant Dynamical Systems Approach. J. Fluid Mech, 1991. 227: p. 245-272.
[21] Jensen, B.B.B., M. Stenby, and D.F. Nielsen, Improving the cleaning effect by changing average velocity. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2007. 18: p. S58-S63.