Value Index, a Novel Decision Making Approach for Waste Load Allocation
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33104
Value Index, a Novel Decision Making Approach for Waste Load Allocation

Authors: E. Feizi Ashtiani, S. Jamshidi, M.H Niksokhan, A. Feizi Ashtiani

Abstract:

Waste load allocation (WLA) policies may use multiobjective optimization methods to find the most appropriate and sustainable solutions. These usually intend to simultaneously minimize two criteria, total abatement costs (TC) and environmental violations (EV). If other criteria, such as inequity, need for minimization as well, it requires introducing more binary optimizations through different scenarios. In order to reduce the calculation steps, this study presents value index as an innovative decision making approach. Since the value index contains both the environmental violation and treatment costs, it can be maximized simultaneously with the equity index. It implies that the definition of different scenarios for environmental violations is no longer required. Furthermore, the solution is not necessarily the point with minimized total costs or environmental violations. This idea is testified for Haraz River, in north of Iran. Here, the dissolved oxygen (DO) level of river is simulated by Streeter-Phelps equation in MATLAB software. The WLA is determined for fish farms using multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) in two scenarios. At first, the trade-off curves of TC-EV and TC-Inequity are plotted separately as the conventional approach. In the second, the Value-Equity curve is derived. The comparative results show that the solutions are in a similar range of inequity with lower total costs. This is due to the freedom of environmental violation attained in value index. As a result, the conventional approach can well be replaced by the value index particularly for problems optimizing these objectives. This reduces the process to achieve the best solutions and may find better classification for scenario definition. It is also concluded that decision makers are better to focus on value index and weighting its contents to find the most sustainable alternatives based on their requirements.

Keywords: Waste load allocation (WLA), Value index, Multi objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO), Haraz River, Equity.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1106817

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2027

References:


[1] E., Feizi Ashtiani, M. H. Niksokhan, M. Ardestani, “Multi-objective Waste Load Allocation in River System by MOPSO”, International Journal of Environmental Research, in press.
[2] D. H. Burn, B. J. Lence, “Comparison of optimization formulations for waste-load allocations", Journal of Environmental Engineering, 118(4), 1992, 597-612.
[3] S. A. Mostafavi, A. Afshar, “Waste load allocation using non-dominated archiving multi-colony ant algorithm”, Procedia Computer Science, 3, 2011, 64-69.
[4] N. Mahjouri, A. Ardestani, “game theoretic approach for interbasin water resources allocation considering the water quality issues”, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 167, 2010, 527–544
[5] S.R. Yandamuri, K. Srinivasan, S. Murty Bhallamudi, “Multiobjective optimal waste load allocation models for rivers using nondominated sorting genetic algorithm-II”, Journal of water resources planning and management, 132(3), 2006, 133-143.
[6] W. Kurek, A. Ostfeld, “Multi-objective optimization of water quality, pumps operation, and storage sizing of water distribution systems”, Journal of Environmental Management, 115, 2013, 189-197.
[7] B. Malekmohammadi, B. Zahraie, R. Kerachian, “Ranking solutions of multi-objective reservoir operation optimization models using multi criteria decision analysis”, Expert systems with applications, 38, 2011, 7851-7863.
[8] M.R. Nikoo, R. Kerachian, M.H. Niksokhan, “Equitable Waste Load Allocation in Rivers Using Fuzzy Bi-matrix Games”, Water Resources Management, 26(15), 2012, 4539-4552.
[9] E. Shirangi, R. Kerachian, M. Shafai Bajestan, “A simplified model for reservoir operation considering the water quality issues: Application of the Young conflict resolution theory”, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 146 (1-3), 2007, 77-89.
[10] M. Saadatpour, A. Afshar, “Waste load allocation modeling with fuzzy goals; simulation-optimization approach.” Water resources management, 21(7), 2007, 1207-1224.
[11] P. Kalbar, S. Karmakar, S. Asolekar, “Selection of an appropriate wastewater treatment technology: A scenario-based multiple-attribute decision-making approach”. Journal of Environmental Management, 113, 2012, 158-169.
[12] N. Sa-nguanduan, V. Nititvattananon, “Strategic decision making for urban water reuse application: A case from Thailand”. Desalination, 268, 2011, 141–149.
[13] D. Hidalgo, R. Irusta, L. Martinez, D. Fatta, A. Papadopoulos, “Development of a multi- function software decision support tool for the promotion of the safe reuse of treated urban wastewater”. Desalination, 215, 2007, 90–103.
[14] S. Jamshidi, S. Imani, “Wastewater Reuse, a Solution for Environmental Risks Reduction and Value Index Development for Wastewater Treatment Plants”, Value Engineering and Cost Management Conference, 2014, Tehran, Iran.
[15] S. Hajkowicz, K. Collins, “A Review of Multiple Criteria Analysis for Water Resource Planning and Management”, Water Resource Management, 21, 2007, 1553–1566.
[16] G. Axelrad, E. Feinerman, “Regional planning of wastewater reuse for irrigation and river rehabilitation”, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60(1), 2009, 105–131.
[17] A. Pejman, G. Nabi Bidhendi, A. Karbassi, N. Mehrdadi, M. Esmaeili Bidhendi, “Evaluation of spatial and seasonal variations in surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques”, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 6(3), 2009, 467-476.
[18] A.M. Baltar, D.G. Fontane, “Use of multi-objective particle swarm optimization in water resource management”, Journal of water resource planning and management, 134(3), 2008, 257-265.
[19] A. Azadnia, B. Zahraie, “Optimization of nonlinear Muskingum method with variable parameters using multi-objective particle swarm optimization”, World environmental and Water Resources Congress, ASCE, 2010, 2278-2284
[20] I., Rahimi, K. Qaderi, A.M. Abasiyan, “Optimal Reservoir Operation Using MOPSO with Time Variant Inertia and Acceleration Coefficients”, Universal Journal of Agricultural Research, 1(3), 2013, 74-80.
[21] S. Jamshidi, M.H. Niksokhan, M. Ardestani, “Surface Water Quality Management Using Integrated Discharge Permit and Reclaimed Water Market”, Water Science and Technology, 70(5), 2014, 917-924.
[22] D.H. Burn, J.S. Yulianti “Waste-load allocation using genetic algorithms”, Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management, 127(2), 2001, 121-129.