Triadic Relationship of Icon Design for Semi-Literate Communities

Authors: Peng-Hui Maffee Wan, Klarissa Ting Ting Chang, Rax Suen Chun Lung

Abstract:

Icons, or pictorial and graphical objects, are commonly used in human-computer interaction (HCI) fields as the mediator in order to communicate information to users. Yet there has been little studies focusing on a majority of the world’s population – semi-literate communities – in terms of the fundamental knowhow for designing icons for such population. In this study, two sets of icons belonging in different icon taxonomy – abstract and concrete – are designed for a mobile application for semi-literate agricultural communities. In this paper, we propose a triadic relationship of an icon, namely meaning, task and mental image, which inherits the triadic relationship of a sign. User testing with the application and a post-pilot questionnaire are conducted as the experimental approach in two rural villages in India. Icons belonging to concrete taxonomy perform better than abstract icons on the premise that the design of the icon fulfills the underlying rules of the proposed triadic relationship.

Keywords: Icon, GUI, mobile app, semi-literate.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1105599

References:

[1] ITU. Measuring the Information Society: The ICT Development Index. International Telecommunications Union, 2012.
[2] UNCTAD. Information economy report: science and technology for development - The new paradigm of ICT. United Nation Conference on Trade and Development, 2012.
[3] Half of India's homes have cellphones, but not toilets. http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2992061.ece, 2012.
[4] Garcia, M., Badre, A. N., and Stasko, J. T. Development and validation of icons varying in their abstractness. Interacting with Computers 6, (1994), 191-211.
[5] Schroder, S., and Ziefle, M. Effects of icon concreteness and complexity on semantic transparency: younger vs. older users. Presented at conference, ICCHP '08 Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs. 2008.
[6] Gittins, D. Icon-based human-computer interaction. International Journal of Man Machine Studies 24, (1986), 519-543.
[7] McDougall, S. J. P., Curry, M. B., and de Bruijn, O. Exploring the effects of icon characteristics on user performance: The role of icon concreteness, complexity and distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 6, 3 (2000), 291-306.
[8] Caplin, S. Icon design: Graphics Icons in Computer Interface Design. Cassell, 2001.
[9] Havelock, E. A. Prologue to Greek Literacy. University of Cincinnati Press, 1971.
[10] Grisedale, S., Graves, M., and Grunsteidel, A. Designing a graphical user interface for healthcare workers in rural India. Presented at conference, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) (1997).
[11] Parikh, T., Ghosh, K., and Chavan, A. Design considerations for a financial management system for rural, semi-literate users. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Computer Factors in Computer Systems (CHI) (2003).
[12] Medhi, I., Sagar, A., and Toyama, K. Text-Free user interfaces for illiterate and semiliterate users. Inf. Technol. Int. Devel 4, 1 (2007), 37-50.
[13] Arend, U., Muthig, K.-P., and Wandmacher, J. Evidence for global feature superiority in menu selection by icons. Behavior and Information Technology 6, (1987), 411-426.
[14] Rogers, Y., and Oborne, D. J. Pictorial communication of abstract verbs in related to human-computer interaction. British Journal of Pshychology 78, (1987), 99-112.
[15] Stammer, R. B., George, D. A., and Carey, M. S. An Evaluation of Abstract and Concrete Icons for A CAD Package. In E. D. Megaw, ed., Contemporary ergonomics. Taylor & Francis, 1989.
[16] Stammer, R. B., and Hoffman, J. Transfer between icon sets and ratings of icon concreteness and appropriatness. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, (1991).
[17] Stotts, D. B. The usefulness of icons on the computer interface: Effect of graphical abstraction and functional representation on experienced and novice users. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, (1998).
[18] Rogers, Y. Icons at the interface: their underfulness. Interacting with Computers 1, (1989), 105-117.
[19] Santa, M., Debasis, S., Satya, R. D., et al. Language independent icon-based interface for accessing internet. Advanced in Computing and Communications 191, 3 (2011), 172-182.
[20] Statistics, UNESCO Institue for. http://www.uis.unesco.org/literacy/Pages/adult-youth-literacy-data-viz.a spx.
[21] Cooper, A., and Reimann, R. About Face 2.0, The Essentials of Interaction Design. Wiley Publishing, 2003.
[22] Chipchase, J. Understanding Non-Literacy as A Barrier to Mobile Phone Communication, 2005.
[23] Indrani, M., Somani, P., Emma, B., et al. Designing mobile interfaces for novie and low-literacy users. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 18, 1 (2011), 2-28.
[24] Ivatury, G. Harnessing technology to transform financial services for the poor. Small Enterpr. Devel. 15, 4 (2004), 25-30.
[25] Thatcher, A., Shaik, F., and Zimmerman, C. Attitudes of semi-literate and literate bank account holders to the use of automatic teller machines (ATM). Int. J. Industrial Ergonomics 35, (2005), 15-30.
[26] Thatcher, A., Mahlangu, S., and Zimmerman, C. Accessibility of ATMs for the functionality illiterate through icon-based interfaces. Behav. Inf. Technol. 25, 1 (2006), 65-81.
[27] Sheetal, K. A., Arun, K., Amit, A. N., et al. User-generated content creation and dissemination in rural areas. USC Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism 6, 2 (2010), 21-37.
[28] Frohlich, D. M., Rachovides, D., Riga, K., et al. Storybank: mobile digital storytelling in a development context, Human Factors Computing Systems (CHI '09), (2009), 1761-1770.
[29] Andrew, M., Gary, M., and Richard, H. Making the link - providing mobile media for novice communities in the developing world. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 69, (2011), 647-657.
[30] Peierce, C. S. Collected Papers. Harvard University Press, 1931.
[31] Nadin, M. Interface design: a semiotic paradigm. Semiotica 69, 3/4 (1998), 269-302.
[32] Buchanan, R. Declaration by design: rhetoric, argument, and demonstration in design practice. Design Issues 2, 1 (1985), 4-22.
[33] Shneiderman, B. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Addision-Wesley, 1997.
[34] Siau, K. Human-computer interaction: the effect of application domain knowledge on icon visualization. J. of Computer Information Systems 45, 3 (2005), 53-62.
[35] Kosslyn, S. M. Scanning visual Images: some structural imagination, Perception and Psychophysics, 1979.
[36] Miller, A. Imagery in Scientific Thought. MIT Press, 1986.
[37] Anderson, J. R. Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications, 1990.
[38] Norman, D. Things That Make Us Smart. Addison-Wesley, 1993.
[39] Blankenbergers, S., and Hahn, K. Effects of icon design on human-computer interaction. International Journal of Man Machine Studies 35, (1991), 363-377.
[40] Isherwood, S. J., McDougall, S. J. P., and Curry, M. B. Icon identification in context: the changing role of icon characteristics with user experience. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49, 3 (2007), 465-478.
[41] Wang, H.-F., Hung, S.-H., and Liao, C.-C. A survey on of icon taxonomy used in the interface design. 14th European conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. London, 2007.
[42] Lodding, K. N. Iconic interfacing. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 3, 2 (1983), 11-20.
[43] Blattner, M. A., Sumikawa, D. A., and Greenberg, R. A. Earcons and icons: their structure and common design principles. Human-computer interactions 4, 1 (1989), 11-40.
[44] Purchase, H. Defining multimedia. IEEE Multimedia 5, 1 (1998), 8-15.
[45] Lidwell, W., Holden, K., and Butler, J. Universal Principles of Design. Rockport Publishers, 2003.
[46] Moyes, J., and Jordan, P. W. Icon design and its effect on guessability, learnability and experienced user performance. People and Computers VIII (1993), 49-59.
[47] Sarah, I. Graphics and semantics: the relationship between what is seen and what is meant in icon design. Engin. Psychol. and Cog. Ergonomics (2009), 197-205.
[48] Kim, J. H., and Lee, K. P. Cultural difference and mobile phone interface design: icon recognition according to level of abstraction, MobileHCI'05, 2005.
[49] Pappachan, P., and Ziefle, M. Cultural Influences on the comprehensibility of icons in mobile-computer interaction. Behavior and Information Technology 47, 4 (2008), 331-337.
[50] Satchell, C., and Ziefle, M. The smart phone as globalizing icon of the early 21st century. http://www.ucd.smartinternet.com.au/Documents/MobilePhone_Globali zing.pdf, 2010.
[51] Ferguson, A., and Brown, W. Standard symbols - using the iso test method. In P. T. McCabe, ed., Contemporary Ergonomics. Taylor & Francis, 2003.