Assuming the Decision of Having One (More) Child: The New Dimensions of the Post Communist Romanian Family

Authors: Raluca-Ioana Horea-Şerban, Marinela Istrate

Abstract:

The first part of the paper analyzes the dynamics of the total fertility rate both at the national and regional level, pointing out the regional disparities in the distribution of this indicator. At the same time, we also focus on the collapse of the number of live births, on the changes in the fertility rate by birth rank, as well as on the failure of acquiring the desired number of children. The second part of the study centres upon a survey applied to urban families with 3 and more than 3 offspring. The preliminary analysis highlights the fact that an increased fertility (more than 3rd rank) is triggered by the parents’ above the average material condition and superior education. The current situation of Romania, which is still passing through a period of relatively rapid demographic changes, marked by numerous convulsions, requires a new approach, in compliance with the recent interpretations appropriate to a new post-transitional demographic regime.

Keywords: Family size intention, fertility rate, regional disparities, third birth rank.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1100915

References:

[1] Köppen, Katja, Second births in western Germany and France, Demographic Research, volume 14, article 14, 2006, pp. 295-330.
[2] Samir, K.C., Barakat, B., Goujon, A., Skirbekk, V., Sanderson, W., and Lutz, W., Projection of populations by level of educational attainment, age, and sex for 120 countries for 2005‒2050. Demographic Research 22(15): 383‒472. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2010.22.15, 2010.
[3] Goode, W.J., World changes in divorce patterns. New York: Yale University Press, 1993.
[4] Salvini, S. and Vignoli, D., Times change: Women‘s and men‘s marital disruption dynamics in Italy during a time of social transformations, 1970‒2003. Demographic Research 24(5): 145‒174, 2011.
[5] Cigno, A., Economics of the family. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.
[6] Becker, G.S. (1993). A Treatise on the family. Enlarged edition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
[7] Hotz, V.J., Klerman, J.A., and Willis, R.J. (1997). The economics of fertility in developed countries. In: Rosenzweig. M.R. and Stark, O. (eds.). Handbook of population and family economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 275‒347.
[8] Gough, M. and Noonan, M., A review of the motherhood wage penalty in the United States. Sociology Compass 7(4): 328‒342. doi:10.1111/soc4.12031, 2013.
[9] Matysiak, A., Interdependencies between fertility and women's labour supply. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1284-3, 2011.
[10] Neyer, G., Welfare states, family policies, and fertility in Europe. In: Neyer, G., Andersson, G., Kulu, H., Bernardi, L., and Bühler, C. (eds.). The Demography of Europe. Dordrecht: Springer: 29‒53. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-8978-6_3, 2013.
[11] Oláh, L. and Bernhardt, E., Sweden: Combining childbearing and gender equality. Demographic Research 19(25): 1105‒1143. doi:10.4054/DemRes. 2008.19.28, 2008.
[12] Lappegård, T., Family policies and fertility in Norway. European Journal of Population 26(1): 99‒116. doi:10.1007/s10680-009-9190-1, 2010.
[13] Miettinen, A., Basten, S., Rotkirch, A., Gender equality and fertility intentions revisited: Evidence from Finland. Demographic Research, Volume 24, Article 20, Pages 469-496, http://www.demographicresearch. org/Volumes/Vol24/20/ DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2011.24.20, 2011.
[14] Myrskylä, M., Kohler, H.-P., and Billari, F., Advances in development reverse fertility declines. Nature 460: 741-743. doi:10.1038/nature08230, 2009.
[15] Miettinen, A. and Rotkirch, A., Milloin on lapsen aika. Lastenhankinnan aikeet ja esteet (When is the right time for children? Fertility intentions and barriers). E/34. Helsinki: Population Research Institute, Family Federation of Finland, 2008.
[16] Breton, D. and Prioux, F., Two children or three? Influence of family policy and socio-demographic factors. Population (English Edition) 60(4): 415–445, 2005.
[17] Toulemon, L., Pailhé, A., and Rossier, C., France: High and stable fertility. Demographic Research 19(16): 503‒556. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.16.s, 2008.
[18] Kreyenfeld, M., ‘Time-squeeze, partner effect or self-selection? An investigation into the positive effect of women’s education on second birth risks in West Germany’, Demographic Research 7 (2), 2002.
[19] Kantorová, V., Education and entry into motherhood: The Czech Republic during state socialism and the transition period (1970-1997). Demographic Research Special Collection 3(10): 245-274. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2004.S3.10, 2004.
[20] Thornton, A. and Philipov, D., Sweeping changes in marriage, cohabitation and childbearing in Central and Eastern Europe: New insights from the developmental idealism framework. European Journal of Population 25(2): 123-156. doi:10.1007/s10680-009-9181-2, 2009.
[21] Thévenon, O., Family policies in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review 37(1): 57‒87. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457. 2011.00390.x, 2011.
[22] Kohler, H.-P., F. C. Billari, and J. A. Ortega. , The emergence of lowestlow fertility in Europe during the 1990s, Population and Development Review 28(4): 641–680, 2002.
[23] Mishtal, J. Z., Understanding low fertility in Poland: Demographic consequences of gendered discrimination in employment and postsocialist neoliberal restructuring. Demographic Research Volume 21, Article 20, pages 599-626, http://www.demographic-research.org/ Volumes/Vol21/20/ DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2009.21.20, 2009.
[24] Stein, P., Willen, S., Pavetic, M., Couples’ fertility decision-making. Demographic Research, Volume 30, Article 63, pages 1697-1732, http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol30/63/ DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.63, 2014.
[25] Kohlmann, A. and Kopp, J., Verhandlungstheoretische Modellierung des Übergangs zu verschiedenen Kinderzahlen. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 6(4): 258−274, 1997.
[26] Ott, N., Familienbildung und familiale Entscheidungsfindung aus verhandlungstheoretischer Sicht. In: Wagner, G., Ott, N., and Hoffmann-Nowotny, H.-J. (eds.). Familienbildung und Erwerbstätigkeit im demographischen Wandel. Berlin: Springer: 97−116. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-83989-4_7, 1989.
[27] Caplescu, R., Using the theory of planned behaviour to study fertility intentions in Romania. Procedia Economics and Finance, 7th Internatioal Conference on Applied Statistics, 2014.
[28] Ajzen, I., The Theory of Planned Behaviour. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, pages 179-211, 1991.
[29] Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., Predicting and changing behaviour. Psychology (Vol. 3, page 79), 2010.
[30] Jaba, E., Robu, I-B. , “Explorarea statistica a pietei de audit în scopul aprecierii independentei auditorului”, Audit Financiar, 9(6), 28-36, 2011.
[31] Benzécri, J.P., Statistical analysis as a Tool to make Patterns Emerge from Data, in Methodologies of Pattern Recognition, ed. New York: Academic Press, pp. 35-74, 1969.
[32] Lebart, L., Piron, M., Morineau, A., Statistique exploratoire multidimensionnelle. Visualisation et inférences en fouille de données, 4e édition, Dunod, Paris, pp. 186-190, 2006.
[33] Sennett, R., The Corrosion of Character, The Personal Consequences Of Work In the New Capitalism, W. W. Norton, London, U.K., pp. 133-136, 1998.
[34] Putnam, R., Social Capital: Measurement and Consequences, Canadian Journal of Policy Research, vol.2, pp. 41-51, 2000.
[35] Caldwell, J. C., Caldwell, P., Mcdonald, P., Policy Responses To Low Fertility And Its Consequences: A Global Survey, Journal of Population Research, vol. 19, no. 1, 2002.
[36] McDonald, P., Low fertility and the state: the efficacy of policy. Population and Development Review 32, 3, 485–510, 2006.
[37] Coleman, D., The Road to Low Fertility, Ageing Horizons No. 7, pp. 7- 15, 2007.
[38] Gheţău, V., Declinul demografic şi viitorul populaţiei României, Ed. Alpha MDN, Buzău, 2007, pp. 44-54, 2007.
[39] Muresan, Cornelia , Shimbările comportamentului familial în Romania, Presa Universitară Clujeană, Cluj Napoca, pp. 155-162, 2012.
[40] Van de Kaa D. Postmodern fertility preferences: from changing value orientation to new behaviour, w: R. Bulatao, J. Casterline (eds.), Global Fertility Transition, A Supplement to Vol. 27, Population and Development Review, 2002.
[41] Rotariu, T., Mezei, E., Who is (still) Giving Birth in Romania?, Rev. Romanian Sociology, vol.2, pp. 97-112, 2012.
[42] Istrate M., Muntele, I., The Family Policies and their Impact on the Evolution of Fertility in Post-Communist Romania, ATINER Conference Paper Series no. DEM2014, pp.75-83, 2014.
[43] Van Peer, C., Desired and achieved fertility in E. Klijzing and M.Corijn (eds.) Dynamics of Fertility and Partnership in Europe: Insights and Lessons from Comparative Research, Vol. 2. New York and Geneva: United Nations, pp. 117-141, 2002.
[44] Traian Rotariu (coord.), Inertie si schimbare. Dimensiuni sociale ale tranzitie in Romania, Ed. Polirom, Iasi, pg. 138, 2012.
[45] Rotariu, T. Demografie si sociologia populatiei. Structuri si procese demografice, Ed. Polirom, Iasi, pp.280-286, 2009.
[46] Tudora, D., Muntele M., Coeziune teritorială şi disparităţi în Moldova, Ed. UAIC, Iaşi, pp. 275-277, 2012.
[47] Philipov, D., Jasilioniene, A., Union formation and fertility in Bulgaria and Russia: a life table description of recent trends, Demographic Research, 19 (62): 2057-2114, 2008.
[48] Hărăguş, Mihaela., Intenţia de a avea (încă) un copil, în volumul Populaţia României. Trecut, prezent, viitor, coodonatori Traian Rotariu, Sorina Paula Bolovan, Ioan Bolovan, Presa Universitară Clujeană, pp. 503 – 522, 2006.
[49] Mureşan, C., Hoem, J.M., The negative educational gradients in Romanian fertility, Demographic Research, vol. 22, pp. 95 – 114, 2010.
[50] Beckman, L.J., Couples’ decision-making process regarding fertility. In: Taeuber, K.E., Bumpass, L., and Sweet, J.A. (eds.). Social Demography. New York: Academic Press: 57−81, 1977.
[51] Mureşan, Cornelia, România, într-un stadiu atipic al celei de a doua tranziţii demografice, Sociologie Românească, vol. VIII, nr. 4, pp. 67 – 77, 2010.
[52] Gog, S., Herţeliu, C., Religia în societatea românească, capitol în volumul Inerţie şi Schimbare, coord. Rotariu, T., Voineagu, V, Polirom, pp. 335 – 360, 2012.
[53] *** National Institute of Statistics Romania, www.insse.ro.