Towards Innovation Performance among University Staff

Authors: C. S. Quah, S. P. L. Sim

Abstract:

This study examined how individuals in their respective teams contributed to innovation performance besides defining the term of innovation in their own respective views. This study also identified factors that motivated University staff to contribute to the innovation products. In addition, it examined whether there is a significant relationship between professional training level and the length of service among university staff towards innovation and to what extent do the two variables contributed towards innovative products. The significance of this study is that it revealed the strengths and weaknesses of the university staff when contributing to innovation performance. Stratified-random sampling was employed to determine the samples representing the population of lecturers in the study, involving 123 lecturers in one of the local universities in Malaysia. The method employed to analyze the data is through categorizing into themes for the open-ended questions besides using descriptive and inferential statistics for the quantitative data. This study revealed that two types of definition for the term “innovation” exist among the university staff, namely, creation of new product or new approach to do things as well as value-added creative way to upgrade or improve existing process and service to be more efficient. This study found that the most prominent factor that propels them towards innovation is to improve the product in order to benefit users, followed by selfsatisfaction and recognition. This implies that the staff in the organization viewed the creation of innovative products as a process of growth to fulfill the needs of others and also to realize their personal potential. This study also found that there was only a significant relationship between the professional training level and the length of service of 4 - 6 years among the university staff. The rest of the groups based on the length of service showed that there was no significant relationship with the professional training level towards innovation. Moreover, results of the study on directional measures depicted that the relationship for the length of service of 4- 6 years with professional training level among the university staff is quite weak. This implies that good organization management lies on the shoulders of the key leaders who enlighten the path to be followed by the staff.

Keywords: Innovation, length of service, performance, professional training level, motivation.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1100685

References:

[1] C. L. Wang, and P. K. Ahmed, “The development and validation of the organizational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis”, European Journal of Innovation Management, 7, 2004, pp. 303-313.
[2] C. Y., Lin, and T. H. Kuo, “The mediate effect of learning and knowledge on organizational performance”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(7), 2007, pp. 1066-1083.
[3] Southern Regional Education Board. Schools need Good Leaders now: State progress in creating a Learning-Centered School Leadership System. Atlanta, 2007. Retrieved from: 9211www.sreb.org 2007.
[4] Global Human Capital Trends 2014: Engaging the 21st-century workforce, A report by Deloitte Consulting LLP and Bersin, United Kingdom: Deloitte University Press, 2014.
[5] R., Bordia, E, Kronenbreg, and D. Neely, Innovation’s OrgDNA, U. S. A.: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc, 2005.
[6] A. H., Van de Ven, and H. L. Angle, An introduction to the Minnesota innovation, 1989.
[7] L. D. McLean, “Organizational Culture’s Influence on Creativity and Innovation: A Review of the Literature and Implications for Human Resource Development”, Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(2), May 2005, 226-246.
[8] P. E., Tesluk, J. L, Farr, and S. A. Klein, “Influences of organizational culture and climate on individual creativity”, Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(1), 1997, 27-41.
[9] A. H. Maslow, “A Theory of Human Motivation”, Psychological Review, 50(4), 1943, 370-96. Retrieved from http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Maslow/motivation.htm
[10] A. G. Robbinson, and S. Stern, Corporate creativity: How innovation and improvement actually happen, San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 1997.
[11] Seyed Ebrahim Jafari Kelarijani, Ali Reza Heidarian, Reza Jamshidi and Mohamad Khorshidi, “Length of Service and Commitment of Nurses in Hospitals of Social Security Organization (SSO) in Tehran”, Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine, 5(2), 2014, 94-98.
[12] S. O. Popoola, “Personal Factors Affecting Organizational Commitment of Records Management Personnel in Nigerian State Universities”, IFE Psychologia, 14, 2006, 183–97. In A. H. Van de Ven, H. L. Angle, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Research on the management of innovation (pp. 3-30). New York: Harper & Row.
[13] J. Y. Chang and J. N. Choi, “The Dynamic Relation between Organizational and Professional Commitment of Highly Educated Research and Development (R&D) Professionals”, Journal of Social Psychology, 147(3), 2007, 299–315.
[14] S. Bauld, and K. McGuiness, Exercising Leaderships, U. S. A.: Public Sector Purchasing, 2007.
[15] R. F. Elmore, “Leadership as the Practice of Improvement Preliminary Draft. OECD Activity on Improving School Leadership”, Paper presented at International Conference: International Perspectives on School Leadership for Systemic Improvement, June, 2006.
[16] I. Nonaka, “The Knowledge-Creating Company”, Harvard Business Review, 69, Nov-Dec 1991, 96-104.
[17] M., Basadur, G. B. Graen, and S. G. Scandura, “Training Effects on Attitudes toward Divergent Thinking among Manufacturing Engineers”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(4), 1986, 612-661.