Energetic and Exergetic Evaluation of Box-Type Solar Cookers Using Different Insulation Materials

Authors: Ademola K. Aremu, Joseph. C. Igbeka

Abstract:

The performance of box-type solar cookers has been reported by several researchers but little attention was paid to the effect of the type of insulation material on the energy and exergy efficiency of these cookers. This research aimed at evaluating the energy and exergy efficiencies of the box-type cookers containing different insulation materials. Energy and exergy efficiencies of five box-type solar cookers insulated with maize cob, air (control), maize husk, coconut coir and polyurethane foam respectively were obtained over a period of three years. The cookers were evaluated using water heating test procedures in determining the energy and exergy analysis. The results were subjected to statistical analysis using ANOVA. The result shows that the average energy input for the five solar cookers were: 245.5, 252.2, 248.7, 241.5 and 245.5J respectively while their respective average energy losses were: 201.2, 212.7, 208.4, 189.1 and 199.8J. The average exergy input for five cookers were: 228.2, 234.4, 231.1, 224.4 and 228.2J respectively while their respective average exergy losses were: 223.4, 230.6, 226.9, 218.9 and 223.0J. The energy and exergy efficiency was highest in the cooker with coconut coir (37.35 and 3.90% respectively) in the first year but was lowest for air (11 and 1.07% respectively) in the third year. Statistical analysis showed significant difference between the energy and exergy efficiencies over the years. These results reiterate the importance of a good insulating material for a box-type solar cooker.

Keywords: Efficiency, energy, exergy, heating, insolation.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1100677

References:

[1] E. Sorgüven and M. Özilgen (2012).Energy utilization, carbon dioxide emission, and exergy loss in flavored yogurt production process. Energy, Vol. 40, pp. 214-225.
[2] S. C. Kaushik and M. K. Gupta (2008).Energy and exergy efficiency comparison of community-size and domestic-size paraboloidal solar cooker performance.Energy for Sustainable Development, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 60- 64.
[3] R. Jayesh, V. Kumaresh, P. R. Saravana, L. G. Vivek and L. T. Yuvaraj (2013). Design of Cost Effective Parabolic Solar Cooker. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research Vol. 8, No. 15 pp. 1809-1816.
[4] I. Dincer and Y. Cengel (2001). Energy, Entropy and Exergy Concepts and Their Roles in Thermal Engineering.Entropy Vol. 3 pp. 116-149.
[5] V. Amir, N. Aminreza, G. Mohammad and V. Sadegh (2011). Exergy Concept and its Characteristic. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 47- 52.
[6] L. P. Ignacio, R. M. Javier, G. F. Celina, A. Jime´nez A. lvaro and N. C. Rafael (2013). A New Simple Method for Estimating Exergy Destruction in Heat Exchangers.Entropy, Vol. 15, pp. 474-489.
[7] P. G. Gang, X. Zhou, J. Ji and S. Yuehong (2012). Comparative Experimental Analysis of the Thermal Performance of Evacuated Tube Solar Water Heater Systems With and Without a Mini-Compound Parabolic Concentrating (CPC) Reflector(C < 1).Energies Vol. (5) pp. 911-924.
[8] A. K. Pandey (2014). Exergy Analysis and Exergoeconomic Evaluation of Renewable Energy Conversion Systems. PhD Thesis. Katra, India: SMVDU Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University.
[9] F. Margo, T. Sarah, S. Jordan, H. Hannah and G. Emily (2008).Solar Cooker Earth Analog and Comparison of Design efficacy. Global Climate Change available at: jvarekamp.web.wesleyan.edu/CO2/Solar%20Cooker%20Paper.pdf (Accessed: 28/07/2014).
[10] I. I. Rikoto and I. Garba (2013). Comparative Analysis on Solar Cooking Using Box Type Solar Cooker with Finned Cooking Pot. International Journal of Modern Engineering Research.Vol.3, No. 3, pp. 1290-1294.
[11] D. Buddhi. and L. K. Sahoo (1997). Solar cooker with latent heat storage: Design and experimental testing. Energy Conversion and Management. Vol. 38, No5, pp. 493–498.
[12] O. V. Ekechukwu and N. T. Ugwuoke (2003). Design and Measured Performance of a Plane Reflector Augmented Box-Type Solar Energy Cooker. Renewable Energy Vol. 28 pp. 1935- 1952.
[13] H. M. S. Hussein, H. H. El-Ghetany and S. A. Nada S.A. (2008).Experimental investigation of novel indirect solar cooker with indoor PCM thermal storage and cooking unit. Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 49, pp. 2237-2246.
[14] N. M. Nahar (2009). Design and development of a large size non-tracking solar cooker.Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 264-271.
[15] V. K. Pandya, N. C. Shailesh and T. P. Bakul (2011).Assessment of Thermal Performance of Box Type Solar Cookers under Gujarat Climate Condition in Mid-Summer. IJERA Vol. 1, No. 4, pp.1313-1316.
[16] E. Yousif, O. B. Omar and A. Anwar (2012). Thermal evaluation of a sun tracking solar cooker. International Journal of Energy and Environment, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 83-90.
[17] M. Hussain and M. D. Khan (1996). Fabrication and performance studies on a low cost solar cooker having an inclined aperture plane.Renewable Energy, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 762-765.
[18] C. C. Uhuegbu (2011) Design and Construction of a Wooden Solar Box Cooker with Performance and Efficiency Test. J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res., Vol.1, No.7, pp. 533-538.
[19] R. S. Mishra and S. P. Prakash (1984).“Evaluation of solar cooker thermal performance using different insulating materials”.International Journal of Energy Research, Vol. 8, No. 4, 393-396.
[20] A. K. Aremu and R. Akinoso (2013). Effect of Insulating Materials on Performance of a Solar Heater. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 64-68
[21] ASAE, 2003. Testing and Reporting Solar Cooker Performance. Standard S580. American Society of Agricultural Engineers.
[22] K. Saravanan and B. Janarthanan (2014). Energy and Exergy Analysis of Double Exposure Box-Type Solar Cooker.IJIRSET, 3(6), pp.13104-13.