Differences in Innovative Orientation of the Entrepreneurially Active Adults: The Case of Croatia
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32804
Differences in Innovative Orientation of the Entrepreneurially Active Adults: The Case of Croatia

Authors: Nataša Šarlija, Sanja Pfeifer

Abstract:

This study analyzes the innovative orientation of the Croatian entrepreneurs. Innovative orientation is represented by the perceived extent to which an entrepreneur’s product or service or technology is new, and no other businesses offer the same product. The sample is extracted from the GEM Croatia Adult Population Survey dataset for the years 2003-2013. We apply descriptive statistics, t-test, Chi-square test and logistic regression. Findings indicate that innovative orientations vary with personal, firm, meso and macro level variables, and between different stages in entrepreneurship process. Significant predictors are occupation of the entrepreneurs, size of the firm and export aspiration for both early stage and established entrepreneurs. In addition, fear of failure, expecting to start a new business and seeing an entrepreneurial career as a desirable choice are predictors of innovative orientation among early stage entrepreneurs.

Keywords: Multilevel determinants of the innovative orientation, Croatian early stage entrepreneurs, established businesses, GEM evidence.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1100476

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1905

References:


[1] F. Damanpour, “Organizational innovation: A meta analysis of effects of determinants and moderators,” Academy of Management Journal, vol.34, no.3, pp. 555-590. 1991.
[2] A. A. Wennekers, R. Thurik, P.D. Reynolds, and S. Wennekers, “Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development.”, Small Business Economics, vol.24, no.3, 2010, pp.293.
[3] D. Kelley, N. Bosma and J.E. Amorós, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, 2010 Global Report. Babson Park MA, Santiago, Chile: Babson College, Universidad del Desarrollo, 2011.
[4] S. Shane, “Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy”, Small Business Economics, Vol.33, 2009, pp. 141- 149.
[5] M. van Praag and A. van Stel, “The more business owners the merrier? The role of tertiary education”, Small Business Economics, 42, no.2, 2013, pp. 335-357.
[6] F. Delmar, P. Davidsson, and W.B. Gartner, “Arriving at the high growth firm”, Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 18, no.2, 2003, pp.189-216.
[7] J. E. Amoros and N. Bosma, “Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, 2013 Global Report: Fifteen years of Assessing Entrepreneurship across the Globe”, www.gemconsortium.org (access: 10.09.2014)
[8] P. K. Wong, Y. P. Ho and E Autio, “Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 24, no.3, 2005, pp. 335-350.
[9] S. Wennekers, A. Van Stel, M. Carree and A.R. Thurik, “The relationship between entrepreneurship and economic development: Is it U-shaped?” Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, Vol.6, no. 3, 2010, pp. 167-237.
[10] N. Bosma, “Entrepreneurship, Urbanization economies and productivity of European Regions” chapter in M.F. Fritsch (ed.). Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, Cheltenham (UK); Northampton, MA (USA): Edward Elgar, 2011, pp.107-132.
[11] E. Autio, Global Report on High-Expectation Entrepreneurship, London: Babson, Mazars, London Business School, 2005.
[12] S. Terjesen and L. Szerb, “Dice thrown from the beginning? An empirical investigation of determinants of firm level growth expectations”, Estudios de Economia, Vol.35, no.2, 2008, pp.153-178.
[13] I. Verheul and L. Van Mil, “What determines the growth ambition of Dutch early-stage entrepreneurs?” Scientific Analysis of Entrepreneurship and SME?s, 2008, H200811.
[14] E. Autio, Global Report on High-Growth Entrepreneurship, London: Babson, Mazars, London Business School, 2007.
[15] E. Karadeniz, and A. Őzcam, “The determinants of the growth expectations of the early-stage entrepreneurs (TEA) using the Ordinal Logistic Model (OLM): The Case of Turkey”, Economic and Business Review, Vol. 12, No.1, 2010, pp. 61-84.
[16] G.T.M. Hult, R.F. Hurley, and G.A. Knight, “Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance,” Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 33, 2004, pp. 429-438.
[17] Z. J. Acs, “How is entrepreneurship good for economic growth?”, Innovations, vol. 1, no.1, 2007, pp. 97-107.
[18] S. Tavassolli, “Innovation determinants over industry life cycle”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Early view online published 4 Feb. 2014.
[19] S. Radas and Lj. Božić, “The antecedents of SME innovativeness in an emerging transition economy”, Technovation, vol.29, 2009, pp. 438-450.
[20] I. Romero, and J.A. Martinez-Roman, “Self-employment and innovation. Exploring the determinants of innovative behavior in small businesses”, Research Policy, vol.41, 2012, pp. 178-189.
[21] D. J. Sheskin, “Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures”, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Washingon D.C., 2004.
[22] F. E. Jr. Harrel, “Regression modeling strategies with applications to linear models, logistic regression and survival analysis”, Springer: Berlin, 2001.